Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Club v Country (Football)

Biffo

Well-Known Member
Apologies if there has been a similar therad on this recently - I had a look through the last week or so and couldn't find one though. If you support one of the big English Premier League clubs (and are English) does supporting England mean as much to you as your team does?

I've been told by Geordies in the past that they don't see themselves as English anyway. Now David Fairclough (ex-Liverpool and England player) has said the same thing goes for Liverpool. Any Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Everton, Newcastle, Spurs or Villa (& maybe Charlton & Bolton) fans out there who put country before club in the support-stakes? Or has the former super sub got it right?

Fairclough's article:-
"England's lame victory over Wales was crucial for World Cup qualification but for Liverpool fans it was greater relief seeing local lads Steven Gerrard and Jamie Carragher coming through the game fit and well.
I have noticed for some time now how uninterested Liverpool fans are in the England team. It seems to me that most Liverpool supporters, and I include myself in this group, are unwilling to share their football passion between the Reds and the national side.

I suppose it's not entirely surprising when you consider that that the city of Liverpool is basically a republic at the end of the M62. For as far back as I can remember, Liverpool people have always seen themselves as separate to the rest of the country. We've got our own identity, which has very little in common with the rest of the north never mind the rest of the country. In fact, you won't hear many Liverpool fans describing themselves as northerners because they see themselves as completely different to the people from Yorkshire or Newcastle.

Whether our independence is down to the fact that we're a port and we're so close to Ireland and Wales or whether it's because our city has produced the greatest ever football team and the greatest ever pop band, I'm not sure, but we've certainly never felt the need to buy into this whole English pride thing.

When it comes to football, we require our teams to be built in our own image, not a mixture of the average and the over-hyped. Our traditions are set deep and are quite unique, moulded as they have been in recent times by the likes of Bill Shankly and Bob Paisley.

The rivalries we have with our main adversaries are too strong to put away for 90 minutes of national success. When Frank Lampard scored for England against Northern Ireland back in March, I couldn't cheer because here was the same player who, however unintentionally, had robbed us of Xabi Alonso for almost three months with a broken ankle. It's the same with Wayne Rooney and the Neville brothers – how can you expect a Liverpool supporter to sing their name just because they're swapped their club shirt for that of their country?

I personally can't remember supporting England with any real enthusiasm since Roger Hunt's days. I tend to think this lack of interest stems back over the last 30 years, as the national team has been perceived as the team of the south. Whether it was the same when I went to Wembley to watch the World Cup final as a kid, I'm not sure, but certainly since then I've never been able to get as excited about England as I can Liverpool. In the 70s when Liverpool began to dominate football at home and abroad, the national press tried everything they could to keep a lid on our success through their canvassing of London-based players for the England team.

These days though, I think a lot of fans of clubs like Liverpool, Manchester United and Arsenal would be quite happy if their players were never selected for international duty. With the football calendar so full, international games are seen as a hindrance especially for teams with great ambitions of competing for the main trophies.

International football is not without its plus points, however as we all love the World Cup every four years. It's a festival of football for virtually a month and the chance to enjoy the world's best players but it doesn't seem to matter for us if England are there or not. More than simply cheering England on, it's about having a pint and watching the telly. England didn't make it to USA '94 and to be honest, I didn't really miss them.

But how do the players feel? Every footballer I've ever met aspires to play for their country. It's a benchmark of achievement and it is a great scene to be a part of. Personally I see my England caps as great souvenirs but they don't compare with my Liverpool medal collection.

Playing for your country is great but comes at a price as every performance is dissected and analysed by the entire country. You can leave for the game as the country's saviour and return questioning even your own ability. In the 1980s, John Barnes was the best player in the England team and yet he was subjected to so much criticism and abuse he did well to maintain his strength of character to perform to such a high level for us on his return.

I read recently how embarrassed he was to have every touch booed and jeered by the England supporters while he was playing for his country against San Marino. Really makes you proud to be an English fan, doesn't it?

More than the abuse dished out to the likes of Barnes and Steve McManaman, it is the thought of injuries that dominate fans fears when international week takes over proceedings. Jamie Redknapp, to name just one player, suffered two terrible injuries while with England and those injuries effectively robbed the player and us Liverpool fans of his best years in a Red shirt.

In recent years the choice of England managers has failed to inspire us (Ricky Tomlinson might have been a step in the right direction!) and add to that so many average players getting call ups and it's not hard to see why so many fans fail to get excited about the national team.

Obviously, Carragher and Gerrard are fully deserving of their international selections and when they play we will wish them well, but their safe return is the most important thing. England results are neither here or there compared to a win over Manchester United or Chelsea. Tomorrow night England take on Northern Ireland and Carragher and Gerrard will be a big part of Sven's selection. Win, lose or draw, as long as they both come back in one piece I'll be happy."
 
fuck.international.football.



(in answer to your question i know that man united fans have been very vocal in the past about club before country - especially since the beckham death threats from west ham etc)
 
Mate, i've been an arsenal fan since 1974, and an england fan for the same time.

England is always far more important than arsenal. I've enjoyed some fabulous times with my club, but only england can provide me with football nirvana.

I'm sure anyone saying otherwise should be checking into the funny farm.

England over arsenal any day. Maybe easy to say, coz we've won a lot, but my heart is talking here...
 
"I suppose it's not entirely surprising when you consider that that the city of Liverpool is basically a republic at the end of the M62. For as far back as I can remember, Liverpool people have always seen themselves as separate to the rest of the country. We've got our own identity, which has very little in common with the rest of the north never mind the rest of the country. In fact, you won't hear many Liverpool fans describing themselves as northerners because they see themselves as completely different to the people from Yorkshire or Newcastle."

I'd be really shocked to hear anyone from liverpool confirm these sentiments of fairclough.

Has he got it wrong, or is he right?

I just cannot believe it, and i hereby consign the bloody idiot to the funny farm.
 
fela fan said:
I'd be really shocked to hear anyone from liverpool confirm these sentiments of fairclough.

Has he got it wrong, or is he right?

I just cannot believe it, and i hereby consign the bloody idiot to the funny farm.

as a 'foreigner' who used to live in liverpool and now lives in manchester i would say its spot on, merseyside and the rest of North Wales in general is very different to the North of England.
 
fela fan said:
"I suppose it's not entirely surprising when you consider that that the city of Liverpool is basically a republic at the end of the M62. For as far back as I can remember, Liverpool people have always seen themselves as separate to the rest of the country. We've got our own identity, which has very little in common with the rest of the north never mind the rest of the country. In fact, you won't hear many Liverpool fans describing themselves as northerners because they see themselves as completely different to the people from Yorkshire or Newcastle."

I'd be really shocked to hear anyone from liverpool confirm these sentiments of fairclough.

Has he got it wrong, or is he right?

I just cannot believe it, and i hereby consign the bloody idiot to the funny farm.


Like Boris Johnson said, they have their "own grief" as well.

<runs away and hides>
 
Chorlton said:
as a 'foreigner' who used to live in liverpool and now lives in manchester i would say its spot on, merseyside and the rest of North Wales in general is very different to the North of England.

Was that the case in the 70s when they had seven liverpool players in the england team, including hughes as skipper???
 
fela fan said:
Was that the case in the 70s when they had seven liverpool players in the england team, including hughes as skipper???

I think with Fairclough it comes down to success. Basically England haven't won anything for 39 years whereas Liverpool have won quite a lot of leagues and cups during that time. As he said, his medals mean more to him than his internatinal caps. If a Geordie chooses club over country though it would be for a different reason.
 
fela fan said:
Was that the case in the 70s when they had seven liverpool players in the england team, including hughes as skipper???

i've got no idea and couldn't care less - it was a weak troll... that said emlyn hughes is a *very* welsh name
 
I'm only an England fan once every two years for two weeks in the summer. And I do that reluctantly.

Much prefer domestic football.
 
west ham are more importent then england but i do want england to win and play well.

Its just england is only part time west ham is all season long.


dave
 
I'm not old enough to properly remember Villa winning the league and European Cup in the early 80's and certainly not old enough to remember 1966 but if they were both to be repeated then I think my excitement would be greater for the Villa.....I'll get back to you....when pigs fly!!!!
 
International football means very little to me. The decision to put the England team back in London put the final nail in the coffin.

Most people in Newcastle see it as a Southern thing to support England, and if it came to Newcastle getting 3 points over England winning Germany 06, I'd take the 3 points every single time.

Maybe its a regional thing, I dunno. As Mmm likes to say 'Chelsea supporting rule britannia home counties types'
 
Rocket Romano said:
As Mmm likes to say 'Chelsea supporting rule britannia home counties types'


until very recently he was claiming allegiance to both club and country - i think he only changed after he read on some websites that he was only supposed to support liwwypool
 
Chorlton said:
until very recently he was claiming allegiance to both club and country - i think he only changed after he read on some websites that he was only supposed to support liwwypool

:D

Does anybody else find watching international games incredibly dull, nothing seems to happen.
 
Another one here that favours club over country

I`d rather see Spurs win (lets face it though we have been slightly starved of success lately!) than England who i don`t really give two shits about..international football is mediocre enough without the press devoting pages and pages of analysis over the drabest 1-0 win i`ve ever seen.

Living in down here though there are your fair share of Chelsea/West Ham/Spurs/Arsenal etc supporting rule Britannia home counties or Lahdahn types. I even know of someone who claims to support England but no league team :confused:

I`m intrigued to hear more about areas of England where support for England would appear to be weaker. i`ve heard the same thing from others in the past and always wondered how true it was.
 
The rather abstract but useful test is if you are given a choice between success for your club or for your country which would you choose? Personally i would sacrifice a 100 world cups for one FA cup...but then i do support plymouth argyle! Club first definitely.
 
Personally i always think that the greater attachment comes from having seen my club live so many times and never having seen england play live. That sense of really belonging to the club comes from supporting the club in person imho.
 
I can't say I have a preference because they're very different events. I don't want Robbo, Ledders, Carrick or Defoe to be injured playing for England, but no less than I want Stalteri, Lee, Davids, Reidy, Keano or Mido to be injured playing for their country. It does sometimes seem weird having to cheer on Ashley Cole and all those other Arsenal players who play for England ;) but that's just part of it. I support the teams and they're never going to play each other anyway.
 
fela fan said:
Mate, i've been an arsenal fan since 1974, and an england fan for the same time.

England is always far more important than arsenal. I've enjoyed some fabulous times with my club, but only england can provide me with football nirvana.

I'm sure anyone saying otherwise should be checking into the funny farm.

England over arsenal any day. Maybe easy to say, coz we've won a lot, but my heart is talking here...

But is that partly because you've lived abroad for so long, and rarely go to games? I'd say England doing well was about on a par with West Ham, but then I've been abroad for ages, and also when I'm back home only go to a few games a season - if I was a season ticket holder, I reckon West Ham would come first.

Since I came to China, because west ham were in the lower league I had no way of watching their games, so England became more important. Now they're back up and I can see them play again. Probably about equal.
 
Bollocks to England. Fuck the '40 years of hurt', the cliches, the 'England expects' bullshit, the jingoism, the queen-saving, middle-class tossers pretending to be 'lads', smashing up German cars every time they lose, crappy flags everywhere, tabloid over-reaction, middle-england/home counties pubs full of 'football experts' who support Man U/Chelsea but never venture to any games, corporate tie-ins everywhere, pissed-up braindead fans spending the night in police cages whilst fans of the opther home nations get invited to the local street party as guests of honour, bollocks tothelot of it.

I'm English born to an Irish family. Maybe its because I've always felt a bit distanced from both of the countries I'd be eligible to play for. Maybe its just because I don't want any part of any of that shite above.

I'm also a forest fan. Going to the City Ground has been a miserable cross to bear for a few years now, sitting amongst aseverly depressed crowd watching us excel at getting walked over by lower league sides, then spending the rest of the week being condescended to by fiercely rival supporters who make sure several times a fucking day that i've not forgotten that they support championship sides.

However, given the choice between the two, I'll happily take all of this for the next 10 seasons instead of watching England in me local :cool:
 
fela fan said:
"I suppose it's not entirely surprising when you consider that that the city of Liverpool is basically a republic at the end of the M62. For as far back as I can remember, Liverpool people have always seen themselves as separate to the rest of the country. We've got our own identity, which has very little in common with the rest of the north never mind the rest of the country. In fact, you won't hear many Liverpool fans describing themselves as northerners because they see themselves as completely different to the people from Yorkshire or Newcastle."

I'd be really shocked to hear anyone from liverpool confirm these sentiments of fairclough.

Has he got it wrong, or is he right?

I just cannot believe it, and i hereby consign the bloody idiot to the funny farm.

You always get the odd Londoner, Scouser, Manc, Geordie or Yorkie arguing over ' who is the most different to the rest of the country because we have them this that blah blah'.

Actually seen England play in all these areas and most of the crowd were the locals.
 
Rocket Romano said:
Most people in Newcastle see it as a Southern thing to support England,'

Didn't seem that way the times I was up there. Seemed the most grateful bunch of fans to have England play there along with the Mackems.
 
If club football is so massive in the North East, why is the Riverside perpetually half empty? And why have Sunderland also got so many empty seats in their return-to-the-premiership season?

:confused:
 
Club before country in most cases but if the choice was between midweek mid table affair in October and non life or death interantional I really wouldn't care either way.

What does get me are the people who try hard to get kudos by going one step further with the loyalty to their club with the 'Id swap a World Cup win for any old 3 points'.

Theres being loyal and theres being a moron. I'll happily swap a win I'll have forgotten about in 2 days with a buzzing country, bigger gates and income for my (and in most cases, your) club, a bit of gold and the chance to make every Welsh, Scot and Irishman I know bitter to the core about it.
 
Ticket prices, clubs pricing the fans out in favour of corporate business interests, TV saturation, lackof a competetive league (how many Toon, Boro or Mackem fans can actually see their team winning theleague?)

Usual footie afflictions, that are guaranteeing empty seats everywhere, I'm afraid
 
Back
Top Bottom