yes. The funny thing is how ridiculously easy it would be as well, compared to writing something that has to be so fucking politically perfect - make it funny, don't just write about obviously 'class struggle' issues. And lets face it, only a few copies of CW were even that professional (issue 50 for instance) most of the time it was DIY as fuck. We can EASILY beat that now.
do i? How do i? You had an easily marketable product. You went to a demo where people hated thatcher and sold the a picture of thatcher being killed. Its like selling iron maiden t shirts outside of an iron maiden gig. My point about membership is manifold, but in particular, a) those sales meant nothing in terms of getting the people who bought it to get involved in CW and b) 'getting involved in CW' means as little as it ever has; there was nothing to report in the paper in terms of what 'involved' was. You must accept you,as a community activist have more of a plan than CW in its entirety, ever.
Now, the SWP has a plan - one i disagree with and one i think is not working, but it has a plan. So whether your paper was funnier of not, the people buying theirs could see what the plan was.
PS - i love CW paper, i hoarde it under me bed. Don't ever get that wrong, i think its mint. It has to be part of something else, something steady and thought out and targetted.