Louloubelle said:that's a derail I don't have time for
and yet one you instigated.
Louloubelle said:that's a derail I don't have time for
Dubversion said:and yet one you instigated.
Dubversion said:no harm in that. i don't like the books and have no desire to see the film, but that's just my subjective take on it - never claimed anything else.
all i'm saying is that a) these things DO have subtexts and b) to claim the predominant subtext in the Narnia books is Christianity is either dumb or wilfully revisionist. doesn't mean you can't still like them.

Cid said:in the above extract it basically just says that he doesn't approve of the objectification of women as sex objects in porn and that he doesn't like it because of that. A less offensive view you could not find...
Idris2002 said:Wrt Moorcock and porn - I think his stance comes from editing New Worlds Sci-fi magazine in an office where the neighbouring office was occupied by a porn mag. The neighbours used to show him some genuine reader's letters and they displayed a pretty disturbing level of misogyny.

Idris2002 said:Not if you're no longer a kid.
That really ticks me off, adults reading children's books. Bloody Harry Potter.
Go for it! They're great! I always find that I want to read them if in a bad/sad/depressed mood - escape from the world, or something..marty21 said:i never read these books as a kid, are they worth reading now? probably will see the film, looks great on the clips and that...
damn right. but why didn't you include the mighty Enid Blyton and Penny Coltman??Vixen said:Harry Potter and Narnia are for adults and children.
<nods decisively>
Idris2002 said:Not if you're no longer a kid.
That really ticks me off, adults reading children's books. Bloody Harry Potter.
resists... urge... to... post... many, many, many reggae album sleeves...Dubversion said:god bothering bollocks with talking animals. i'd rather eat my own puke than bother with this

not quite getting the dub/loulou spat here tho...
)
)See the film, the books are excellent, for a child, but it would appear they fall down badly under an adults eyemarty21 said:i never read these books as a kid, are they worth reading now? probably will see the film, looks great on the clips and that...

MarkMark said:I liked 'the magicians nephew', that would make a great film too!
(surely they should do *that one* first anyway, after all genesis is before the gospel.. right?)



RenegadeDog said:That's good. He looked like utter piss in the old BBC version. Even as a 13 year old that didn't impress me one bit. Damn cheap BBC budgets!![]()
this is in fact incorrect.silentNate said:no great film I'm afraid![]()