Hardly fair on the lions. They'd choke on the poisonous old hag.guinnessdrinker said:I can't wait to see maggie and rumsfeldt mauled and eaten by lions.
Hardly fair on the lions. They'd choke on the poisonous old hag.guinnessdrinker said:I can't wait to see maggie and rumsfeldt mauled and eaten by lions.
That does derserve correction. Us Lefties had Saddam's number in the 80s at a time when he was being given the freedom of Chicago for services to the US arms industry. Now that could be dumb luck as most slavishly follow the all America all of the time idea with a bigoted certainty that would make a Red Guard blush but allow us to be right occasionally.mears said:Or maybe you guys wanted to end the sanctions and go back to supporting Saddam like the 1980's?
You all never really say
KeyboardJockey said:Nice One! I remember the bitch from hell coming in and seeing my area die and be colonised by yuppies I need to celebrate her passing. Just a shame it wasn't in 1981.
Andy the Don said:So would approx 30,000 Iraqis, 2,500 US + UK troops as well as any respect the US & UK had in the gulf, let's not talk about the billions of dollars the whole adventure has cost the US>
rogue yam said:LOL! That is one of the funniest things I've yet seen on u75! "...(D)ie and be colonized by yuppies"! Too much. Ever hear of a guy named Yogi Berra? He was famous (in part) for saying things that were somewhat askew in a humorous way. He once (purportedly) said of a restaurant "Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded." Sort of sounds like your neighborhood, doesn't it. Of course what really happened was that Maggie routed the socialists, lifted some of the chains from the British economy, and as a result talented and hardworking people across the U.K. were better able to produce, prosper, and enjoy the fruits of their labor. Now, of course that meant that the lazy, the stupid, the asocial, and the inebriated in some cases had to move elsewhere to collect their dole and buy their hooch, but who cares? Besides them (you), I mean.
rogue yam said:LOL! That is one of the funniest things I've yet seen on u75! "...(D)ie and be colonized by yuppies"! Too much. Ever hear of a guy named Yogi Berra? He was famous (in part) for saying things that were somewhat askew in a humorous way. He once (purportedly) said of a restaurant "Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded." Sort of sounds like your neighborhood, doesn't it. Of course what really happened was that Maggie routed the socialists, lifted some of the chains from the British economy, and as a result talented and hardworking people across the U.K. were better able to produce, prosper, and enjoy the fruits of their labor. Now, of course that meant that the lazy, the stupid, the asocial, and the inebriated in some cases had to move elsewhere to collect their dole and buy their hooch, but who cares? Besides them (you), I mean.
rogue yam said:Well, 30,000 Iraqis (say) minus all the ones Saddam would have killed, of course. You lefties always leave that term out of the equation, for some reason.
oi2002 said:The Shah never managed to torture and hang as many of the Iranian comrades as Khomeni but we put that down to him being a lazy Imperialist.
KeyboardJockey said:There are many of us who want to retrain to help our society and our economy but we cannot afford to do so.
KeyboardJockey said:Add a zero on to that figure and that will be the result of Blairs mid east misadventure in about a year or so.
rogue yam said:This is the leftist fallacy in its essence. "Retrain"? Get a job, lad. "Help our society"? Help yourself, mate. "(C)annot afford to do so"? You can't afford not to. So get busy.
rogue yam said:This is the leftist fallacy in its essence. "Retrain"? Get a job, lad. "Help our society"? Help yourself, mate. "(C)annot afford to do so"? You can't afford not to. So get busy.


rogue yam said:What are you talking about?
rogue yam said:This is the leftist fallacy in its essence. "Retrain"? Get a job, lad. "Help our society"? Help yourself, mate. "(C)annot afford to do so"? You can't afford not to. So get busy.
TAE said:If Saddam had been able to prove that he had no WMD, what would have happened then?
Andy the Don said:So would approx 30,000 Iraqis, 2,500 US + UK troops as well as any respect the US & UK had in the gulf, let's not talk about the billions of dollars the whole adventure has cost the US>
oi2002 said:That does derserve correction. Us Lefties had Saddam's number in the 80s at a time when he was being given the freedom of Chicago for services to the US arms industry. Now that could be dumb luck as most slavishly follow the all America all of the time idea with a bigoted certainty that would make a Red Guard blush but allow us to be right occasionally.
In the early 80s some of us Leftie folk were just getting over the mass hangings in of our Iranian comrades (lots went to Uni in the UK) while complaining bitterly about this fascist bastard Saddam. He was DC's pet once the Shah had got his just deserts. The Shah never managed to torture and hang as many of the Iranian comrades as Khomeni but we put that down to him being a lazy Imperialist.
The minor US desk jockey that shook the Iraqi butcher's bloody mit we were certain would soon be forgotten. And when Saddam used Chemical weapons (no scarily vague WMD back then, we called a nuke a nuke) against Iran using US supplied equipment and we were all up arms about it for a couple of years as both the US and UK hotly denied that this had happened.
Memories were short of course, by the 90s for some useful idiots Saddam had transformed into an anti-Imperialist hero.
And I've no sympathy whatever for Cheney; that boy's going straight to Yankee hell. If there is one reason why DC rushed headlong towards Baghdad it's his dodgy ticker; a lot of better people have died because one old draft dodger was in hurry.
bfg said:So you've changed your tune slightly then to :"Yes, we're fighting a hypocritical fucking 'war' with the hope of manipulating Iraq for our own needs, and cocking up in the process, but hey, we're not as bad as those damn frenchies?"
![]()
![]()
mears said:Or maybe you guys wanted to end the sanctions and go back to supporting Saddam like the 1980's?
You all never really say
KeyboardJockey said:Only one word for that diatribe -- bullshit.
I grew up with people who lived through the hell of queuing up at the dock gate praying for work to feed their families and in many cases going away with no work an dno money for food. That scum Thatcher brought these hungry times back so don't you dare comeon here and waffle on about 'breaking the chains on the economy' the chains are still there and are now forged of a much harder material.
Talented and hardworking people are getting kicked in the teeth as adirect result of Thatcher's policies and those of her apprentice Blair. There are many of us who want to retrain to help our society and our economy but we cannot afford to do so.
You sir (I assume) need to read slightly more wider.
You're getting very repetitive, you knowmears said:This message is hidden because mears is on your ignore list.

rogue yam said:Well, 30,000 Iraqis (say) minus all the ones Saddam would have killed, of course. You lefties always leave that term out of the equation, for some reason.
mears said:If Mr Cheney is going to Yankee hell, is Mr. Chirac going to French hell?
mears said:UN sanctions were placed on Iraq from August 6, 1990 until June, 2003. Sanctions on Iraq were the most comprehensive in modern history, following the first gulf war, which directly targeted water treatment plants,and electrical infrastructure It is estimated that over 500,000 children died as a direct result of economic sanctions, primarily of water borne disease.
http://vitw.org/archives/380
What you clowns wanted. The status quo
Humanitarians, all of you
Johnny Canuck2 said:Things were pretty tough way back when.
http://members.aol.com/deafdude2/lyric/lyrics/patchesccc.htm
Isambard said:Oh pray do tell!![]()
On October 10, 1973, Agnew became the second Vice President to resign the office. Unlike John C. Calhoun, who resigned to take a seat in the Senate, Agnew resigned and then pled nolo contendere (no contest) to a criminal charge of tax evasion, part of a negotiated resolution to a scheme wherein he allegedly accepted $29,500 in bribes during his tenure as governor of Maryland. Agnew was fined $10,000 and put on three years' probation. He was later disbarred by the State of Maryland. His resignation triggered the first use of the 25th Amendment, as the vacancy prompted the appointment and confirmation of Gerald R. Ford as his successor. It remains one of only two times that the amendment has been employed to fill a Vice Presidential vacancy. The other time was when Ford chose Nelson Rockefeller to succeed him as Vice President. Ford hadn't been Nixon's first choice, however. Nixon's top three choices were the former Texas Governor John Connally, New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller and California Governor Ronald Reagan. Nixon thought Connally was too unpopular, and Rockefeller and Reagan unlikely to be confirmed by both Houses of Congress.
Agnew had been widely expected to succeed Nixon as the Republican Party's presidential nominee in the 1976 election before the Watergate scandal broke out. Agnew had always blamed Nixon for releasing the accusations of bribes and tax evasion in order to divert attention from the growing Watergate scandal that was engulfing Nixon's administration. As fate would have it, Nixon was forced from office but Agnew's earlier resignation and criminal charges ruined his hopes of becoming President. The two men never spoke to each other again, although Agnew did attend Nixon's funeral in 1994.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiro_Agnew
mears said:Who do you think supported Saddam more, the US or French? I say French. Funny how no one ever puts up a picture of Mr. Chirac and Saddam shaking hands.
If Mr Cheney is going to Yankee hell, is Mr. Chirac going to French hell?
nino_savatte said:He was charged with tax evasion (though who knows what other charges he was guilty of).
Crooks, every man jack of them!
mears said:snip.... Yankee hell, QUOTE]
Yankee Hell Oh yes that must be that place where everyone pays proportional and fair taxes has a health service that is not privatised decent public facilities and are not afflicted by squalor ignorance and want.
Sounds a nice place to me.