TheHoodedClaw
acknowledging ur soup leg
I hope I'm never on trial with some of you lot on the jury "Pffft, who needs evidence - supposition will do just fine!".
Good point. Case closed.![]()
A lot of silly conjecture about what might have happened three years ago proves nothing.
This thread is made of fail.
I don't have too, she's been passed as legal.
Prove she's on drugs.
![]()

I hope I'm never on trial with some of you lot on the jury "Pffft, who needs evidence - supposition will do just fine!".
No we can't; some drugs could have been expelled within that time. See the letter linked in the OP.
The drug mentioned in the letter that could clear the system in 3 days was EPO which is used by endurance athletes, not by sprinters.
It's already been proven that she is a doping violator.
Woof

I don't know if she's a drugs cheat, but she has bought the suspicion on herself by failing to submit to three drugs tests.
No doubt. And paid a heavy price for it too.
The drug mentioned in the letter that could clear the system in 3 days was EPO which is used by endurance athletes, not by sprinters.
Err... no. It says "In general terms, explosive strength athletes, such as sprinters, use anabolic steroids, growth hormone, insulin and EPO during the off season. They use these drugs in conjunction with an intense weight training program, which helps to develop a strength base that will serve them throughout the competitive season."
Violator!![]()

Ben Johnson didn't test positive until the olympics. A test only works if they know what they are looking for... i.e. Marion Jones and the designer steriods THG... undetectable until a coach handed in the syringe containing the drug! I'm Canadian... this has nothing to do with nationality... I'm still proud of the fact Ben Johnson is one of the fastest cdn/jamaican sprinters ever juice or no juice. You don't just fall out of bed take steriods and run sub tens.
Johnson made headlines when he ran a 9.79 but his urine test had traces of Stanozolol, an anabolic steroid. Johnson was disqualified and later admitted he was using steroids when he set other records. His coach, Charlie Francis, said Johnson had been using the performance enhancing drug since 1981. It was essentially the end of the Jamaican-born runner.
Undetected steriod use for seven years until the '88 Seoul Olympics... and this was twenty years ago. I'm sure performance enhancing steriods and steriod masking agents have advanced in twenty years to once again become undetectable to Olympic level testing. Usain's run merely points out that athletes can, and always will, maintain a few paces ahead of drug-testing efforts.
I want to believe Usain Bolt's 9.69 is legit, history tells me otherwise. In all the time's posted of Usain Bolt's 200m from 18 to 21 in 3 years he has improved .30 seconds. In a shorter distance 100m in less than 5 races he has improved .30 sec which is impossible if you know anything about sprinting... thanks for the info that proves Usain has more steriods in him then Ben Johnson and an entire Kentucky Derby horse race combined.
There are drugs being used that there are yet no tests for.
There are a wide range of very sophisticated strategies that are employed with aplomb in this "game"
Or, if she was using drugs, got off very lightly.
I have no evidence of doping by any of the winners of medals in Beijing, but when times begin falling like rain, questions arise, especially when the record-setters are from countries such as Jamaica and other Caribbean nations where there is no independent anti-doping federation.In the women's 100 meters, for instance, four of the eight finalists in the event were from such countries. Jamaican women swept all three Olympic medals: Shelly-Ann Frasier's winning time of 10.78 seconds is blazing fast, and reflects a drop from a best of 11.31 in 2007 to 10.78 in 2008, an improvement of more than five-tenths of a second in a single year and about five meters faster than before.
If the system is at fault fine, someone should look at changing it, perhaps to a "three strikes you're out" rule.
But Ohuruogu can't be blamed for a flawed system, some are assuming guilt on supposition and guesswork, which is a rocky road.
What's the big deal with the arbitrary "three tests" rule? If it is such a big deal to miss a test, why not ban people for one offence? Or two? And you accept that accidents happen, meaning that it can be OK to miss tests, why not allow somebody four strikes instead of three?
You talk as if three tests is some natural law of the universe -- miss two tests and you are hunky dory but *three*?! My goodness!
What's the big deal with the arbitrary "three tests" rule? If it is such a big deal to miss a test, why not ban people for one offence? Or two? And you accept that accidents happen, meaning that it can be OK to miss tests, why not allow somebody four strikes instead of three?
You talk as if three tests is some natural law of the universe -- miss two tests and you are hunky dory but *three*?! My goodness!
, I mean. 
It's already been proven that she is a doping violator.
Woof


Yes.
She was banned for her doping violation.
You certainly don't seem to that's of any relevance here though so......
*shrugs*
Woof

That is why I've been at pains to say that I don't know that she is guilty.

Jessie...stop this now!
She was proved to be a testing violator not a doping one.![]()
Failing a test, missing three tests or tampering with a sample means that you are proven to be a doping violator. Passing any number of tests does not, unfortunately, mean that you are clean. Some of the most famous drug cheats there are passed a huge number of tests, remember.

Please see post 137.
Woof

That is why I've been at pains to say that I don't know that she is guilty.

Jessie...stop this now!![]()
