nino_savatte
No pasaran!
No one should be allowed to rule because of the cirmcustances of their birth.
paimei01 said:I don't have a problem with a ruler for life, I would like a king that would be above all this political struggle for more money and power.
fela fan said:Why does he offer the proposed changes to parliament and to the people via referenda then?
I'll be your king. You'll have to do as I say though. What sort of king lets the peasants get uppity.paimei01 said:I don't have a problem with a ruler for life, I would like a king that would be above all this political struggle for more money and power.
I have a problem if someone tells me what not to say or else I go to jail, and I have a problem with cameras following me everywhere and someone recording everything I do - soon all the western world will be there
paimei01 said:Look at the queen of England or the emperor of Japan.
The sentence for calling for the abolition of the monarchy is life imprisonment and you can get two years for making fun of the Spanish royal family. That what you mean?paimei01 said:Look at the queen of England or the emperor of Japan. That kind of king is what I am talking about. I said I do not like to see anybody telling me what to say or not say or where not to go. If that king can do that I have no problem with him ruling
philosopher-king perhaps?butchersapron said:I can do that without being king. Are you sure that you mean a king?
History is littered with rulers-for-life bringing about precisely the sort of state of affaris you mention in your 2nd paragraph.paimei01 said:I don't have a problem with a ruler for life, I would like a king that would be above all this political struggle for more money and power.
I have a problem if someone tells me what not to say or else I go to jail, and I have a problem with cameras following me everywhere and someone recording everything I do - soon all the western world will be there
And if they grow unhappy with him (or her), and that ruler is in place "for life", the poeple have no means of changing them.paimei01 said:One must rule. Be sure that not all the people in one country can. So they choose one , does not matter how as long as they are happy with him
paimei01 said:I don't have a problem with a ruler for life, I would like a king that would be above all this political struggle for more money and power.
What do you think a modern King would do?paimei01 said:I have a problem if someone tells me what not to say or else I go to jail, and I have a problem with cameras following me everywhere and someone recording everything I do - soon all the western world will be there
And if it were possible, people in a democracy could just vote for that person again and again - which funnily enough is what this thread is all about.nosos said:to be fair if it were possible for someone to transcend all self-interest and be ultimately wise it wouldn't be a bad idea - the problem is that this isn't possible so it's a fucking stupid idea....
nino_savatte said:No one should be allowed to rule because of the cirmcustances of their birth.
copliker said:The gang of cunts in opposition, your lot I assume, .
Who is he tyrannising exactly?Johnny Canuck2 said:I don't have anyone in Venezuela.
Who is he tyrannising exactly? And why does it bother you?Johnny Canuck2 said:I don't have anyone in Venezuela.
copliker said:Who is he tyrannising exactly? And why does it bother you?
copliker said:I'll take that as an 'I don't know.'
butchersapron said:Because he knows that they'll get passed due to his massive majority -and he only offers some of them, a very very small minority of the total. That doesn't effect any other rights to rule by decree that he might have.
nosos said:to be fair if it were possible for someone to transcend all self-interest and be ultimately wise it wouldn't be a bad idea - the problem is that this isn't possible so it's a fucking stupid idea....