1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Central London mob attacks people in Hyde park

Discussion in 'London and the South East' started by The Black Hand, Aug 3, 2008.

  1. Crispy

    Crispy The following psytrance is baṉned: All

    I think I'll just put my arms out like a jesus then run around spinning with my eyes shut and shouting waaaaaaghhhh and hit anyone I happen to hit.
     
  2. ymu

    ymu Niall Ferguson's deep-cover sock-puppet

    I was responding to editor's post, directly above mine, you egocentric moron.

    If you won't back up your statement or back down, I'll just have to assume you're a testosterone-enslaved moron instead.
     
  3. cesare

    cesare don't mourn, organise!

    That sounds suspiciously like my dad's clip round the ear in passing 'oops, sorry sonny' :D
     
  4. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    So is this the Big Point you've been ready to unleash all this time? Bit of an anti-climax, I must say.
    Hey! Why not ignore all my previous posts on the matter and just paste in your own words and then claim that it represents my opinion? Way to go!

    Quite ridiculous.
     
  5. Melinda

    Melinda Kama roa, efshar livloa?

    *misses Attica*
     
  6. cesare

    cesare don't mourn, organise!

    :D
     
  7. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    Are, we're back to the fantastic fantasy scenarios again!

    Here. Try this: I can think of no likely scenario where I would ever hit a woman. Such a situation has never, ever arisen in all my years on this planet - despite being in quite a few provocative situations - and I can see absolutely no reason why that should change.

    However, if a drug-crazed woman wielding an axe on top of the Empire State building was about to cut the cable to which I - and all of my friends - were hanging on for dear life, I would almost certainly consider a violent response if it meant saving the day.

    Damn! See what you've done there? You've gone and caught me out now!
     
  8. teuchter

    teuchter je suis teuchter

    Sorry, but I missed the post where you stated that, in the situation where it was absolutely impossible to not hit a woman, you would nonetheless manage to not hit the woman. Which would be quite clever really.
     
  9. chico enrico

    chico enrico No hair shows you care.

    yes. that was clear from the progression of the thread. my point still remains valid. you utter clown.

    no. if you care to waste, oh...20 or so minutes of your life trying to find my response to your post you'll see i did answer it. i certainly wouldnt waste anything like that time on you, cos i dont give a fuck :)
     
  10. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    Maybe it would be easier if I just gave you my log in and took the day off, rather than you having to state my opinion through the medium of your own posts?

    I've absolutely no idea what you're on about with that bizarre gibberish above.
     
  11. chico enrico

    chico enrico No hair shows you care.

    haha, this has become analagous to that news story about that mountaineer who got his hand trapped under a falling boulder and would have starved to death had he not severed it:

    apologies for 'changing' quote, but this is simply to illustrate how fucking pathetic, infantile and moronic teuchter's posting was in the first place.
     
  12. teuchter

    teuchter je suis teuchter


    Sorry, but you screwed up. Here is what you should have done:


    That makes sense, doesn't it?

    What you seem to have failed to understand is that the point of that post was to illustrate that the editor's statement that he'd only hit a man if he "absolutely had to" is in effect fairly meaningless, because it fails to establish the criteria that determine what an "absolutely have to" situation is.

    Those criteria are what differentiates between the hitting man/hitting woman scenarios and also what differentiates between the chop off left hand / chop off right hand scenarios. It is the difference in these criteria that I am trying to establish and which no-one seems willing to define, let alone offer a rational explanation for the distinction.

    I'm sorry if that's all too metaphysical for you though.
     
  13. teuchter

    teuchter je suis teuchter

    That sounds like fun. Let's do it!

    I'm only trying to fill the void left by your declining to answer my question.
     
  14. chico enrico

    chico enrico No hair shows you care.

    teuchter. i was a bit charitable earlier on: you're just a dick. now fuck off son.
     
  15. teuchter

    teuchter je suis teuchter

    What you also fail to recognise is that my incompetently altering my quote, you inadvertently imply that hitting a man is exactly the same as hitting a woman, as you have replaced both with the same "analogy".
     
  16. untethered

    untethered For industry & decency

    If these young folk want to work off some steam, perhaps they'd be better off debating the finer points of violence towards women on here than irritating innocent park-goers.
     
  17. cesare

    cesare don't mourn, organise!

    I love it when a debate progresses to the coloured font stage :cool: Can we start a book on who's going to be the first to deploy comic sans?
     
  18. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    You're like those annoying twerps that bother vegetarians with ridiculous nonsense like:

    "Ah, yes, but if you were stuck on a desert island with no hope of rescue and the only food available was roast beef, would you eat it?
    Yes?!! Yes?!!!! Then ha ha!
    I've proved that you're not a real vegetarian! I've won the argument!!! LOLz!"
     
  19. cesare

    cesare don't mourn, organise!

    OMG pk's signed in under chico's log in :eek::D


    *Faynights*
     
  20. teuchter

    teuchter je suis teuchter

    Chico already is.

    By distracting him on here all afternoon we've probably prevented him from hitting at least three people in the park.
     
  21. ymu

    ymu Niall Ferguson's deep-cover sock-puppet

    Which brings me back to where I came in on this thread. Those who do feel a greater taboo against hitting women may not, in practice, have a different standard when it comes to hitting men. But if they observed a man hitting a woman, they'd nevertheless get a whole lot more riled up about it than if he'd been hitting a man.

    There are two straw men on this thread.
     
  22. teuchter

    teuchter je suis teuchter

    If I were a vegetarian presented with that argument I would simply say "yes you have, assuming that your definition of 'real vegetarian' is someone who would eat meat in no circumstances whatsoever". Depending on what my own definition of "real vegetarian" was, I would then continue the discussion accordingly.

    I don't think it's comparable with our discussion where you are refusing to provide the critical piece of imformation that would make it meaningful.
     
  23. chico enrico

    chico enrico No hair shows you care.

    hey, i kinda imagine you to be like a cross between Mr Logic in Viz and that creepy precocious kid with the curly blonde hair and blue velvet suit who was on That's Life in the late 1970s as an 'antiques expert'. :D

    ever find it strange that rooms seem to empty when you walk in?
     
  24. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    LOL. Incredibly, you don't even see how ridiculous you're being.

    If the only way you can 'win' an argument is by artificially constructing a scenario so utterly preposterous that it has no basis in reality, it's really not much of a victory at all.
     
  25. Melinda

    Melinda Kama roa, efshar livloa?

    "One more such victory will undo me!"
    © Pyrrhus of Epirus
     
  26. Chester Copperpot

    Chester Copperpot Triple stones

    I can't believe this thread is still going!
     
  27. Melinda

    Melinda Kama roa, efshar livloa?

    And not even a need for Attica's convoluted contortions! Or is that contorted convolutions? :)
     
  28. quimcunx

    quimcunx Too tall.



    You really, really find the idea that there exists women on earth of sufficient size, strength or state of anger that you couldn't restrain them, so preposterous?
     
  29. chico enrico

    chico enrico No hair shows you care.

    Behave!! there's websites for that sort of stuff - and this isn't one of them! :D
     
  30. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    This thread gets more surreal by the minute.

    Where do these ultra-angry "sufficiently sized" and totally unrestrainable women hang out, and how might I end up getting into a violent contretemps with them?

    Hang on, I think I know the answer: "in your head."
     

Share This Page