littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Nice line, but that's not true, is it? This website is proof of that. Editor would be in jail in Cuba for running this site - have no doubt of that.But enough about the UK today, what's it like in Cuba?
Nice line, but that's not true, is it? This website is proof of that. Editor would be in jail in Cuba for running this site - have no doubt of that.But enough about the UK today, what's it like in Cuba?
I agree they do more so than certain other countries in the EU, but I don't think that's 100% true (which I can prove with things like environmental policy). I also don't think it's particularly accurate to even describe Washington as "neoconservative" any more seeing as most of them got shipped out!Without wishing to speak for the other poster, you could at the very least say that all main political parties in the UK go along with the Washington Consensus view of the world.
Without wishing to speak for the other poster, you could at the very least say that all main political parties in the UK go along with the Washington Consensus view of the world.
Fair enough - it wasn't my line. The UK goes along with the US view of world affairs, though.I don't think so actually; they aren't neoconservatives (or at least only a tiny number are); the neocons are a specific ideological group who go beyond the usual capitalist consensus. For that matter there are quite a few Republicans who are not neocons, which doesn't make them _nice_ of course.
It is odd that the US, the land of the free, seeks to control where its citizens travel outside the US.Anyway, Bush has announced that the US is going to help the people of Cuba achieve democracy. All vacations for the CIA cancelled, then!
It is odd that the US, the land of the free, seeks to control where its citizens travel outside the US.

Stupidest post of the day so far.
A lease dating back about 100 years, well before Batista. The US sends a rent cheque each year, and the Cuban government does not cash it. There is a pile of uncashed cheques now going back 40 years.
Not so much a question of principle, more how do you make the biggest military power in the world remove a military base from your land when international law is not on your side?

While this is true, one big difference is that we can dissent in public, in print, in the media. Cubans cannot.
I think the freedom to dissent in thought and words makes a huge difference.Yeah, we can dissent, doesn't make any difference of course but it's nice to let off steam.
No, not really - there has been little prospect of US attack since the Bay of Pigs fiasco.We can dissent in public in peace time - but during wartime this right is limited. Isn't cuba in a situation very similar to wartime - under siege and permanent fear of US attack and infiltration?
No, not really - there has been little prospect of US attack since the Bay of Pigs fiasco.
I agree they do more so than certain other countries in the EU, but I don't think that's 100% true (which I can prove with things like environmental policy). I also don't think it's particularly accurate to even describe Washington as "neoconservative" any more seeing as most of them got shipped out!
I don't know what will happen for Cuba. As this thread proves, there are good points (social care etc) and bad points (a lack of democracy)
I hope they can find some happy median between the two without interferace from outside (but something tells me a lot of people in Miami right now have other plans...)

No, not really - there has been little prospect of US attack since the Bay of Pigs fiasco.
“Fidel has been the visionary, but hopelessly disorganised," said Brian Latell, a retired CIA officer and author of 'After Fidel', a biography of the Castro brothers. “Raúl has provided the organisational glue. That's why he has been the one truly indispensable man in the revolution, other than Fidel himself.”
Particularly in the early years, Raúl acted as his brother’s hard-line enforcer, eliminating opponents and earning himself the nickname “The Prussian” for his cold, efficient style.
Photographs from the late-1950s show him as a slight young man, directing summary executions of scores of Batista’s fighters. Throughout the years, he has sent even close friends to the firing squad, men like General Arnaldo Ochoa, a highly-decorated veteran of Cuba’s campaigns in Africa.
The partial occupation is a red herring - that's like saying that China was under threat from the UK because of Hong Kong.Maybe not as obvious from a Cuban point of view.
The infiltration still goes on and the surveillance, and the siege, and the partial occupation.
The king is dead long live the king.
Castro's successor 'probably a blood relative' as mentioned in a quote in a post above, is of course his brother Raul, who has been de facto ruler since Castro got seriously ill. The Times On Line has this to report about Raul:-
Plus ça change...
The Cold War dies, bit by bit.
Nurse! My sides!
You mean like Russian bombers buzzing US aircraft carriers? Or spies and poisonings and diplomatic expulsions in Russia and the UK?
That must be the only thing you've see me write then!That's the most sense I've read you write.![]()

Im sure the averga eincome will rise
Raúl is deeply unpopular.
To the level of Cuba's neighbours: Jamaica, Haiti, the Dominican Republic?

In an information-starved environment like Cuba, rumours are rife. I met several people who were convinced that Raul had engineered the death of Cienfuegos, who stood between him and advancement. While he certainly benefited from Cienfuegos's death, I have not seen any proof of a conspiracy.The Cubans I met said Raul was loco, as in overly radical and aggressive towards the USA. There was a rumour that he'd ordered the bombing of Guantanamo Bay while Fidel was out of the country. They were worried about him taking over because they thought he might provoke retaliation.
In an information-starved environment like Cuba, rumours are rife. I met several people who were convinced that Raul had engineered the death of Cienfuegos, who stood between him and advancement. While he certainly benefited from Cienfuegos's death, I have not seen any proof of a conspiracy.

I heard that rumour too.![]()