...and the CPCG and the Lay Visitors panel. The latter view CCTV in Police Stations as a checks and balance sort of thing.Their offices are below....Victim Support is in the same building I believehendo said:I'd start talking to local solicitors if I were you L&S.

Didn't the misuse of the CCTV system led to coppers losing him in a crowd when they should have easily been able to track him and prevent the bomb going off in the first place?L&S said:Eg CCTV was vital to catch the Brixton nail bomber David Copeland and was a very positive use.
The cops were following him that very day and managed to lose him. Was on 't telly the other day but don't remember why they were following - don't know if it was for an unrelated issue.Mrs Magpie said:Eh? He didn't give prior warning...they didn't know he was coming in and planting a bomb.
newbie said:If you think this stuff is going to take years to appear you've missed the way technology is moving in the era of TWAT...
As are burkas![]()


jjf said:Amusing story tangential to this topic: 60 CCTV cameras nicked in Wakefield![]()
In fact, the only effect of the amplified deterrent was to convince an old lady next door that she had heard the voice of God "telling her, in a strong Lancashire accent, to leave the vicinity as soon as possible

Gramsci said:I think it would be better to do a three minute programme on peoples feelings about CCTV.Unfortunately I think people become blase about it.As well as arguments for or against.Rather than individual stories.
Also the Council (who control CCTV)use it to catch shopkeepers putting their rubbish out at the wrong time etc.It is not just used to catch real criminals.Its this low level social control/surveillance that concerns me.
L&S said:Hi
I'm doing some research into CCTV use, in Brixton, for a possible very short film documentary about Brixton.
I'm interested in any people's firsthand experience of positive and negative uses of CCTV, IN BRIXTON.
Eg CCTV was vital to catch the Brixton nail bomber David Copeland and was a very positive use. But recently a writer was misidentified by a witness from CCTV footage (story did not say which area of London was involved) and was subsequently subjected to an extended prosecution for theft despite plenty of evidence to absolutely prove she wasn't even in London at the time of the incident. Although eventually cleared her fingerprints, photos and arrest details remain on file.
Note: Incidences of CCTV being ineffectual eg being blurred, pointed in the wrong way, not recording etc, won't be useful for the documentary.
Thanks very much for any stories!