spanglechick said:oh bugger - is this repeated at all? curse my social life!
bingo! Thanks.PacificOcean said:BBC2 Christmas Eve at 11:40pm.


), but tactless woman does it for me. (aswell as gran and lauren)Does Jesus want you for a sunbeam?kyser_soze said:'Are you dissing the baby Jesus?' (from last years')
Damning with faint praise aren't you? It would be hard to be worse than LB.Maybe slightly more funny than Little Britain.
oh god yes, the one off elements are often excellent - the home for ginger people was brilliant, and i liked the drunk bride's speech, and the detective inspector plus baby sketches. I agree that there are characters that don't work for me at all - but lots of others which - while not being standout, i do really enjoy... for example, i really loved the "what am i like?" couple having kids in this episode. Twas funny and particularly sweet for some reason.stavros said:Damning with faint praise aren't you? It would be hard to be worse than LB.
Tate does obviously have some talent but she runs the risk of repetition by resorting to the recurring characters with catchphrases. The bald gay bloke isn't really funny at all and the granny seems like a Year 7 drama student's idea of being "controversial". However Lauren does have some mileage and I'd like to see her expanded into a mini series where we see her following actual stories. The funniest thing I saw on Tate was the one-off sketch of the seclusion home for ginger people. That was very well done but would fail horribly if it was reinacted in other skecthes with essentially the same joke.
Damning with faint praise aren't you? It would be hard to be worse than LB.

Only girlies like Paul Merton.
Catherine Tate is the comedy sensation of 2005 that somehow passed me by, so I watched The Catherine Tate Christmas Show (BBC2) in order to catch up. I quickly realised that, like Girls Aloud and Crazy Frog and Little Britain, Catherine Tate is a product marketed at children. It's the humour of grossness, embarrassment and cruelty - three ingredients that are essential for a good laugh. The characters are the types that you point at from the top of the school bus - old grans, swishy poofs, common tarts and the mentally ill - and the laughs come from swearing. A sketch about lesbian nurses got applause for the words "muff-munchers" and "fanny-bashers" - fine playground insults both - and its punchline was: "I like a bit of cock." As comedy writing goes, it's a long way from Ronnie Barker.
Quickfire sketch shows are a good example of the law of diminishing returns. What worked brilliantly for The Fast Show - bludgeon them into laughing by sheer repetition - has become the norm. Swearing and catchphrases are great, and Catherine Tate does them as well as anyone, but I can't help longing for something more. I know that "sophistication", "wit" and "intelligence" are dirty words in a TV culture that worships youth and stupidity, but some of us elitist old bastards don't 'alf miss 'em
jasoon said:thought id share an article which I agree whole heartedly with and to re affirm my other post![]()
Rupert Smith
Wednesday December 21, 2005
The Guardian
How is he pretentious?PacificOcean said:Pretentious twat! (the review not you!)
Yeah, but its the same gag and it just isn't that funny after its been told for the fiftieth time.kyser_soze said:In Bloom - it's worth noting that the 'Lauren' character was written before Vicky Pollard, and is and has always been a far better observed and nuanced character than VP.
I think perhaps their allure lies in viewer laziness. Neither requires sustained concentration because you pretty much know exactly what's going to happen and there's no element of thought needed to process the alleged jokes. The truly sad thing with LB is that the basic premise of it, spoofing the stereotypes of our fair isle, is quite a good idea but there's no substance or progression with any of it, and the sketches were hardly hilarious the first time you saw them, let alone the endless rehashes they've practiced.Better than Little Britain - but then again everything is. And like Little Britain, it vexes me why a lot of people seem to like it. Different strokes, eh?