That's an anagram fo the history books
spooky shit.
That's an anagram fo the history books
But what do you do with somebody who is *almost* genetically a woman, but has some of the athletic advantages of a man?
Seriously -- I don't think that the IAAF even know what to do with the situation. Last night they were saying that even if the tests don't show definitively that she is conventionally a woman, they still might not actually stop her competing as a woman.
It's a tough call. All top athletes will have some physical advantage that allows them to win. In a way, an unusual configuration of sex chromosomes is just another version of this.
however if, as they say, she is a woman then why should they care about it arising?

True and those that gain:
TV companies
Corporate sponsors
Print media
I don't think the sport will gain as the public will just think the governing bodies are another bunch of wheeler-dealing, buck-passing freeloaders.
Great post samThat's pretty much where my thoughts have been going, too.
Even if her sex is a little complicated - such as her being XXY or having AIS - she still presents as a woman and was brought up as female. That's enough, IMO.
The whole point of having seperate male and female competitions is that men are, overall, at such a great natural advantage that women would hardly ever beat them in athletics. That would make it rather depressing for the women and boring for the spectators. Having seperate comps sorts that out. A straightforward 'was born with female genitals = goes into female competitions' rule is all that's needed.
Otherwise, what are they going to do, have special competitions for the tiny numbers of intersex athletes?
And, of course, she might just be a biologically uncomplicated woman who's ended up looking more masculine because of intense physical training and small boobs. Oh, and, shock!horror! having short hair. I think the SA authorities were most likely right when they said there are lots of other Limpopo women who look like her.
Because she'd be totally humiliiated by the publicity and the testing? Especially at the age of 18. She wasn't even allowed to do a lap of honour because she got hurried away from the press instead.![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/athletics/8219937.stmTests have revealed Caster Semenya's testosterone level to be three times higher than those normally expected in a female sample, BBC Sport understands.
Analysis prior to the World Athletics Championships and the 18-year-old's big improvement prompted calls for a gender test from the sport's governing body.
It was made public only hours before the South African, who has been backed by her nation, won the 800m in Berlin.
A high level of the hormone does not always equate to a failed drugs test.
Fwiw, Caster is far from the first. It's just, this time, there wasn't enough time between the athlete emerging and the IAAF doing what it has quietly done before behind the scenes. She improved by 7-8 seconds over the distance only 4 weeks before the championships.It's possible that people might learn a little about biological sex from all this, though. There are lots of people who still think that biological sex is just 'male' and 'female' and that's that.
It's possible that people might learn a little about biological sex from all this, though. There are lots of people who still think that biological sex is just 'male' and 'female' and that's that.
Fwiw, Caster is far from the first. It's just, this time, there wasn't enough time between the athlete emerging and the IAAF doing what it has quietly done before behind the scenes. She improved by 7-8 seconds over the distance only 4 weeks before the championships.
It doesn't. It just means she wasn't on the IAAF's radar until her times did improve.I really don't understand how improving her times means she might be a man. It's a very good reason to do extra drugs tests on her, though.
Yeah, I think that the whole palaver could end up being a positive from an educational pov. I've certainly learnt a lot.
However, thinking more about this, the jump between her times last year and this year is so great that doping looks like the more likely scenario.

It doesn't. It just means she wasn't on the IAAF's radar until her times did improve.
I must admit I was a bit taken aback when I hear her talk.

Media were clamouring, they handled it badly and apologised for that. It begins 45 seconds in:Why does that mean that the IAAF had to make the gender tests public knowledge?
I don't see how this helps.Having seperate comps sorts that out. A straightforward 'was born with female genitals = goes into female competitions' rule is all that's needed.
Otherwise, what are they going to do, have special competitions for the tiny numbers of intersex athletes?
I must admit I was a bit taken aback when I hear her talk.

SHE!
the poor lass has been treated shabbily
