Yep - would be different if it ran at high speed - though that isn't a sensible thing to try when it's music - unless it's very expensive kit ...Chorlton said:its £105 which is expensive if you already have a tape deck and no how to do it, it may be less expensive if you sleep on pillows of 20 pound notes.... i dunno!...
Almost the single most important aspect of getting a good recording - whether analogue or digital, is making maximum use of the available dynamic range.Chorlton said:download Audacity and play your music through it - if your not hearing anything come back here for further details - but its pretty straight forward... and hit the big red record button....
gentlegreen said:Almost the single most important aspect of getting a good recording - whether analogue or digital, is making maximum use of the available dynamic range.
When recording onto tape from whatever source you need to keep the level high to keep the music above the noise floor of the tape. (without slamming too hard into the red)
With tape to PC there is much less noise but you need to avoid clipping which can sound really nasty so aim to keep the peak indices at -3db.
That's what I find anyway ....
.
OK - you say 10db, with the material I handle (speech), 3 to 6db headroom seems to work. CoolEdit has peak indices.newbie said:Signal to noise ratio is a relatively minor factor in digital recordings, as the digital noise floor is around -80dB or lower.
You suggest 3dB headroom above peak but this depends on precisely determining transient peaks. A standard VU meter averages levels and doesn't display peaks, so how do you know exactly what the programme peak really is?
Most digital tape decks default to a reference level of -18dBFS (or -20). Allowing for programme peak at standard 8dB above reference that gives 10dB headroom for transients, and a dynamic range of around 60dB.
A greater dynamic range increases the possibility of digital clip, which sounds horrible, with no improvement in sound quality.



)

oryx said:I've got tapes from 1979 that still work okay! It's still the formula in which I have most of my music collection.
The thing about cassette tapes is that unless they are pretty new most cars have cassette, rather than CD players, and the car is one of the places where I've got to have music. I don't play cassette tapes much outside the car but they are great company on a long drive.

foo said:"Record to your computer.
Convert, save, and edit sounds from tape to your PC. Transfer to CD, DVD, or MP3 player. Build your audio collection."
this is just what i want - a friend who's ill has hundreds of tapes and i'd love to get them on cd for her.![]()
is it hugely expensive? is there another way of getting music from tapes on to cd?
newbie said:Signal to noise ratio is a relatively minor factor in digital recordings, as the digital noise floor is around -80dB or lower.