I'd suggest a good quality compact, possibly a bridge if you're interested in learning how to use manual featues. I have an LX3 and it's good for control and picture quality but the lack of zoom will frustrate you based on what you've said.





In this instance, it's probably a good thing: I'm not very techie at all I'm afraid so something user-friendly would be ideal.
Do I need to point out to you that your blurry pics are in low light and your non-blurry ones in good light?
Alrighty then. Pentax/Olympus DSLRs will be cheap, but you'll probably get on better with an entry level Canon or Nikon. I'm not sure about Nikon's, but a Canon 450D might be your thing, you might get a decent 2nd hand price on eBay from someone upgrading and getting rid of surplus lenses as well. If you can stretch your budget the G1 might be better for your tiny hands.
Or a handbag.![]()
O rly?
![]()
O rly?
![]()
![]()
What I was trying to point out is that just because a camera can go to a fast shutter speed doesn't mean much on it's own.
Possibly you did, but I'm not sure why you therefore decided to personalize it, especially since my comment was directed at Madusa's remark that she had difficulty capturing jumping dolphins with her compact.
Since shots like jumping dolphins are usually captured during the day at aquariums etc., the existence of shutter speeds up to 1/3200 is a relevant factor, since it won't be a low light situation.
Whether or not I take blurry low light photos, isn't relevant to whether or not Madusa might be able to adequately capture jumping dolphins during the day, with a compact.
You made a comment that was meaningless on it's own. A lot of your photos are blurry. I thought maybe there was a connection.
My digital compact has a fastest shutter speed of 1/3200. There aren't many dolphins you can't freeze frame with that.
I think I'm seriously considering the Nikon D60.![]()

I think I'm seriously considering the Nikon D60.![]()