Genghis Cohen
Minister For Scrabble
If the sentence was 'excessive' then why has it gone straight from three years to nothing ?
As far as the Uk is concerned I think only the Queen has the power to pardon ... though constitutionally it's done on the recommendation of the Home Sec / Prime Minister.david dissadent said:Do state govenors in America not have similar powers over some crimes and what about home secetaries and prime ministers here, and the queen for that matter?
Know who Mark Rich's lawyer was? That's right. Scooter.zoltan69 said:see also Marc Rich/ Bill Clinton
mears said:If you really want know a shady US presidential pardon look at Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich.
rhod said:And which shady character was Marc Rich's attorney at the time? I think it's pertinent to this thread..
Anyway, there's a big difference between Rich's tax evasion, and Libby's perjury, obstruction of justice and making false statements to FBI investigators.
Valerie Plame's cover was blown, endangering her life and that of her contacts, as well as screwing up the WMD monitoring she was involved in. Libby repeatedly lied to the investigators. Quite a big deal, especially for one of the most senior officials in the administration.
So, there's no real equivalence between what Bush has done, and what Clinton did.
But nice try.

Er, he won't if Bush pardons him when he leaves office.mears said:Please, an ex-wife is a major donor to the Democratic party and her former husband out of the blue gets a Presidential Pardon![]()
Libby can't practice law and is a convicted felon. Even without prison time, (which as I said I believe he deserves) he will pay a price.
mears said:Please, an ex-wife is a major donor to the Democratic party and her former husband out of the blue gets a Presidential Pardon![]()
Libby can't practice law and is a convicted felon. Even without prison time, (which as I said I believe he deserves) he will pay a price.
In what way was it overly harsh, considering it was a felony?mears said:I believe Libby's sentence was overly harsh, but I do believe he deserved some jail time. I would have liked to see Libby spend a couple months in jail, something to atone for his actions, as a Grand Jury, not only a political judge, was involved in this litigation.
You think perjury is comparable to tax evasion?mears said:I hope Bush doesn't grant a full pardon after the November elections in 2008.
If you really want know a shady US presidential pardon look at Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich.
It was towards the lesser end of the tariff guidelines, de facto it was lenient.mears said:I believe Libby's sentence was overly harsh, but I do believe he deserved some jail time.
WTF ?Genghis Cohen said:"At age ten the madam put the child in a cage with a bear trained to couple with young girls so the girls would be frigid and not fall in love with their patrons. They fed her through the bars and aroused the bear with a stick when it seemed to lose interest. Groups of men paid to watch." - Lewis Libby.

President Bush's commutation of the 30-month prison sentence for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, is neither wise nor just. It is clearly within the president's executive powers, but that is beside the point.
We also agree that the 30-month sentence ordered by U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton — a Reagan and Bush appointee — is harsh. It exceeds the 15-21 month guidelines for first-time offenders. A first-time offender who is no danger to the community with an admirable record of public service deserves the lower range, and for that reason the unusually long sentence was unjust.
But none of this exonerates the commutation. Perjury is a serious crime. This newspaper argued on behalf of its seriousness in the 1990s, during the Clinton perjury controversy, and today is no different. We'd have hoped that more conservatives would agree. The integrity of the judicial process depends on fact-finding and truth-telling. A jury found Libby guilty of not only perjury but also obstruction justice and lying to a grand jury. It handed down a very supportable verdict. This is true regardless of the trumped-up investigation and political witch hunt. It is true regardless of the unjustifiably harsh sentence.
Had Mr. Bush reduced Libby's sentence to 15 months, we might have been able to support the decision. Alas, he did not.
mears said:I believe Libby's sentence was overly harsh, but I do believe he deserved some jail time. I would have liked to see Libby spend a couple months in jail, something to atone for his actions, as a Grand Jury, not only a political judge, was involved in this litigation.
I hope Bush doesn't grant a full pardon after the November elections in 2008.
If you really want know a shady US presidential pardon look at Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich.
Johnny Canuck2 said:Clinton made some dodgy pardons and commutations, but that doesn't excuse Bush's inexcusable behaviour in commuting Libby's sentence.
rhod said:
Mr. Gore said the Libby pardon differed from the Clinton administration’s pardons “because in this case the person involved is charged with activities that involve knowledge of what his superiors in the White House did.”
mears said:Libby can't practice law and is a convicted felon. Even without prison time, (which as I said I believe he deserves) he will pay a price.