Sorruy to get angry about this, but it;s SIO
Do please explain!
I'm not dissing sparkling's approach. I'm sceptical about it, but I know she does excellent work, and also I'm not sure I read into her post (will reread in a min) that the target would be made to sit with the bully ...
But my poiint was different really. My consistent point is that in offering support and help to a target of bullying, that support and help, however well intended, will not have any successful practical impact for a bullied young person without a figure of authority (or any peers who try to help) acknowleding first that
1. The bullying is happening
2. That it's totally out of order on any level
3. That the target is 'not bringing it on himself' and that it is not 'his fault' for 'making it worse' or for 'not standing up for himself' through finding it difficult/impossible to 'just ignore' the bully. In other words you do not in any way blame the target (or appear to be doing so) ahead of offering help and advice to him.
It seems fucking elementary to me. If the person perceives himself as being bullied, then you start from the working assumption, pending bully-focussed investigation, that he is being, or at least feels as if he is. Assuming, that it is, that the roles are not being reversed by a manipulative and clever bully, who, as I keep saying, can be VERY adept at recasting the target as the 'bully' and themselves as the victim -- far too many people fall for this and may even end up accusing the target of being themselves a bully ... hence the necessity of taking bullying seriously and invetigating it properly, looking into EVERYTHING thats happened up til now. And not sweeping it under the carpet by 'just ignoring it' and/or by only reacting in isolation
against only the most recent anger/overreaction/counterproductive reaction from the target.
Any advice' you offer to the target will be meaningless, futile and itself counterproductive without starting from that point IMO.
Bit in bold : Not especially. I just want bullying to be dealt with at source - the source being the bully and only the bully.
I'd also like this constant culture of loading 'advice' onto the heads of targets of past and present bullying without even fucking acknowledging the actual bully's fucking existence (or wilfully treating his behaviour as irrelevant, conspicuously ignoring it, etc.), to STOP. Cos target blaming is shit, and that's what advice directed only at the target without acknowledging and dealing with the bully first, amounts to.
None of this means that genuine, helpful, supportive advice isn't appreciated by targets of bullying, but supportiveness means supportiveness and supotiveness means NOT ignoring the bully, however annoyed you might legitimately get by the target's stubbornness and counterproductive behaviour!
If people are unable to offer advice that doesn't recognise or acknowledge what the bully is up to (or, worse, wilfully refuses to) then that's counterproductive advice.
JTG said:tbh, what sparkling does is far more effective in getting actual results than the vengeance ridden nonsense proposed by lmhf and WoW.
Do please explain!
I'm not dissing sparkling's approach. I'm sceptical about it, but I know she does excellent work, and also I'm not sure I read into her post (will reread in a min) that the target would be made to sit with the bully ...
But my poiint was different really. My consistent point is that in offering support and help to a target of bullying, that support and help, however well intended, will not have any successful practical impact for a bullied young person without a figure of authority (or any peers who try to help) acknowleding first that
1. The bullying is happening
2. That it's totally out of order on any level
3. That the target is 'not bringing it on himself' and that it is not 'his fault' for 'making it worse' or for 'not standing up for himself' through finding it difficult/impossible to 'just ignore' the bully. In other words you do not in any way blame the target (or appear to be doing so) ahead of offering help and advice to him.
It seems fucking elementary to me. If the person perceives himself as being bullied, then you start from the working assumption, pending bully-focussed investigation, that he is being, or at least feels as if he is. Assuming, that it is, that the roles are not being reversed by a manipulative and clever bully, who, as I keep saying, can be VERY adept at recasting the target as the 'bully' and themselves as the victim -- far too many people fall for this and may even end up accusing the target of being themselves a bully ... hence the necessity of taking bullying seriously and invetigating it properly, looking into EVERYTHING thats happened up til now. And not sweeping it under the carpet by 'just ignoring it' and/or by only reacting in isolation
against only the most recent anger/overreaction/counterproductive reaction from the target.Any advice' you offer to the target will be meaningless, futile and itself counterproductive without starting from that point IMO.
I know you'd like to cast them into the pits of hades for what they've done but it doesn't actually produce a long term solution, which is the point here.
Bit in bold : Not especially. I just want bullying to be dealt with at source - the source being the bully and only the bully.
I'd also like this constant culture of loading 'advice' onto the heads of targets of past and present bullying without even fucking acknowledging the actual bully's fucking existence (or wilfully treating his behaviour as irrelevant, conspicuously ignoring it, etc.), to STOP. Cos target blaming is shit, and that's what advice directed only at the target without acknowledging and dealing with the bully first, amounts to.
None of this means that genuine, helpful, supportive advice isn't appreciated by targets of bullying, but supportiveness means supportiveness and supotiveness means NOT ignoring the bully, however annoyed you might legitimately get by the target's stubbornness and counterproductive behaviour!
If people are unable to offer advice that doesn't recognise or acknowledge what the bully is up to (or, worse, wilfully refuses to) then that's counterproductive advice.
IMO thats disgusting and abusive - esp if they are on the verge of eating disorders. The bully should be being placed as far away as possible from other children until she learns she cant behave like that towards people.
>
