Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Buffy versus the Cheerleader from Heroes

buffyvchearleeder

  • Buffy

    Votes: 28 53.8%
  • The other Bird

    Votes: 24 46.2%

  • Total voters
    52
8ball said:
I never thought Buffy was so skinny till the later series.

Calling the lass from Heroes 'chubby' goes to show how far we've departed from sanity on these matters.

She probably doesn't have an ounce of fat on her but to look skinny on TV you have to be uber skinny (you'd think they could have solved that by now). If you are merely skinny you look normal. If you are normal you look a little chubby. Its a crying shame really, I wouldn't want to be an actress.
 
Marius said:
Eh? Buffy has that wierd nose, is unnaturally skinny* (makes her face look drawn if you ask me), a permanent scowl (not even an attractive pouty scowl) and has a huge whininess about her that make me want to punch her in the face (except she's 'arde than me and I'm scared).

so? she's a superhero warrior who killed her first lover, had a magical sister foisted upon her, her mum died, she died and then was resurrected, fell out with her friends and saved the world...again.

i think she's entitled to look a little moody ;)
 
baldrick said:
so? she's a superhero warrior who killed her first lover, had a magical sister foisted upon her, her mum died, she died and then was resurrected, fell out with her friends and saved the world...again.

i think she's entitled to look a little moody ;)

That just made her moodier. She was already moody to begin with.
I know teenagers like a bit of angst (I feel just like Buffy did when her mum died etc. Oh the hummanity! What because you mum has grounded you for a week? Yeah what of it?) but like Eastenders it get a bit tiresome after 4 series of it.
 
I get a little tired of the cheerleader's expression after a few hours too. Def went to the Roger Moore School of Botoxed Expressionismism.
 
I liked Buffy the series, but always found Buffy herself the to be the least interesting thing about it. Willow, Xander, Giles and the comedy relief of Cordelia and later Anya were all much more entertaining and were played by better actors.

Sarah Michelle Geller was an improvement over the actress who played Buffy in the film and adequate in the part, but my heart always sinks when she gets cast in a film that I might want to see. There is something so bland and generic about her.
 
Buffy for me. I can't picture Clare without seeing her as Ally McBeal's daughter.

Oh, and irl she's shagging her dad apparently.

e2a: by 'dad' I mean Mr Bennett.

Who I think is hot.

And reminds me of Sean Lock.

Who I also think is hot.
 
Reno said:
I liked Buffy the series, but always found Buffy herself the to be the least interesting thing about it. Willow, Xander, Giles and the comedy relief of Cordelia and later Anya were all much more entertaining and were played by better actors.

i agree with this, however.
 
Buffy would win any battle - she's got the skillz, and Clair can obviously be killed *spoiler in white* as in the 5 Years Gone Episode, when Sylar, disguised as Nathan (he has obviously killed the shapeshifter chick by this point) lures her in and does his 'see how it works' thing. Whether this means that all the heroes powers are in their heads is off course I reckon; basically she needs to be whole, with no forgien bodies in her (hur hur :D) in order to regenerate, so all Buffy would need to do is take some kind of magical Slayer weapon (like the one in S7) and dismember Claire.

Altho on general scales, Claire is WAY cuter, and not just cos of the cheerleader outfit. Altho Buffy's whole S&M thing would probably mean better sex...
 
Liveist said:
Turned 18 either yesterday or today apparently... no I haven't been counting down :o

Today according to IMDB.

Which means she wasn't during filming. I feel bad about fancying her now. TBH I've felt bad about it all along. Underage girls shouldn't be allowed to look hot :(
 
spanglechick said:
i was referring to the "battle of the babes", "Buffy is a minger", "chubby slag" comments which characterised he first few posts on the thread. (and, indeed - the OP) - it's now turned nto a death match - which is much better.:p


i find them both attractive, but that aint the point of the OP.
 
DotCommunist said:
sod of dude, it's a genuine inquiry. I'm always comparing whod win against who superhero-wise in my head.
Okay, in that case: Buffy would beat the cheerleader, but Sylar would fuck her shit up. And eat her brain. :D

SG
 
buffy vs claire, buffy wins easy, just overpower her for long enough to dismember her and stick her bits in boxes

all the scoobys vs all the heroes, the heroes win
 
Someone made a very good point earlier though that Clare is protected by many heroes.

So really it would be Clare and all her hero chums versus Buffy and all her sidekicks.

I'm thinking Hiro alone could take out all of Buffy's geeks with some grandfather elimination tactics.
 
Marius said:
I'm thinking Hiro alone could take out all of Buffy's geeks with some grandfather elimination tactics.

now thats just cheating, and then we'd be overrun with vampires and demons and armies of the undead, so it really wouldnt make much difference who won either way
 
Correction it ain't just Buffy no more she's now got an army of slayers at her disposal (see the last series of Angel). So Scoobies, plus Slayer with magic axe, plus army of other slayers, v Claire and the Heroes?

Pffft. They'll be mopping up bits of Hiro, Jessica and Claire for weeks.
 
Crispy said:
I think this will blow up into the standard u75 phwoar thread shitstorm within the next 15 minutes. Prove me wrong, I dare ya.

Buffy nude
buffyc.jpg


Clair nude
200px-Painting_realized_claire_autopsy.jpg


No fucking contest :D


GS(v)
 
May Kasahara said:
Buffy all the way, she's much hotter/sexier/cuter/non-objectifying adjective than Clare, and the regeneration thing would prove no problem for a human who can slay gods, demons and an intangible evil from before the dawn of time.

It's also jew vs shiksa.
 
selamlar said:
Clare can regnerate, but she can also be killed, see the date-rape incident with the branch. She is also not super-strong/fast etc like Buffy. I'm going Buffy, on the grounds that although she wouldn't be able to permanently kill Claire, she could put her in, say, the freezer and leave her there.

Clare could do like she did to that guy who raped and killed her: lure buffy into a car, then drive the car into a brick wall at 60mph.

Or buffy and clare fighting on a rooftop, clare grabs on, and jumps off with buffy in tow. Bye bye buffy.

I'm for clare, just because buffy's been around a long time, and is a little tired.
 
spanglechick said:
No fucking way - photoshopped, innit? Surgically enhanced boobs that SMG really doesn't have.

It was the head not fitting on the neck right that gave it away for me.
 
Back
Top Bottom