He won't be - conference doesn't decide on that, it has nothing to with that it at all.
I know !
He won't be - conference doesn't decide on that, it has nothing to with that it at all.
I see the health scare stories as coming from within the Labour party itself with my logic being as follows.
Labour do not stab thier leaders, at least publicly, in the back. But they also know that with Brown in charge their chances at the next election are zero.
Their chances with anybody else in charge are also pretty poor but it would not be the total wipe out that its going to be and with the pressure on the Conservatives to do something to get rid of the current disparity of power that Scottish MP's have over English affaris then Labour could well find themselves losing a lot of potential power in Westminster over night. Throw in plans to cut the numbers of MP's and suddenly Labour, if they lose big, could be out of power for a long long time (took most of this bit from an article in yesterdays Observer).
There is also the fear of an internal civil war as those from the 'New' and 'Old' sides of the Labour divide go at it hammer and tongs.
Surely the best thing all round would be if Brown has to resign through ill health ? Even his biggest detractors cannot slate him for doing the right thing and stepping down. So it would make sense for those who consider themselves to be doing the best for the Labour Party in the long term to start putting the pressure on with regards to his health. It stinks of Mandleson.
Now I dont see Brown ever resigning. His whole life has been about getting to number 10 and I dont think that he will, after having to put up with Blair in the chair he considered rightfully his for so long, step down. Its just not him.
So we have a very interesting few months.
I think that at the conference he will look to shore up his support from the Unions by way of having them ready to step in and apply pressure should the PLP look to instigate a full blown coup.
But its all good fun and hopefully the last Labour conference with a Prime Minster leading it for generations.![]()

However I don't really buy into using Cameron's lack of experience as a particularly valid argument against him. I think you could've said much of the same about Blair in 97 versus Major as an elected PM, ex-chancellor, with many years of service in government.
Major was a far better PM than Blair was
how so?
How could you forget the Cones Hotline?
And didn't he pave the way for the Radio Times to carry commercial TV listings?
Need I go on?

how so?
i just saw Mandleson's speech on the tv. My skin crept off my body and crawled out of the door.
And didn't he pave the way for the Radio Times to carry commercial TV listings?
Well, he didnt embroil us in two wars that have killed hundreds of British soldiers and hundreds of thousands of other people for a start, nor did he break the economy by throwing billions and billions of pounds at private companies, irrespective of previous performance or their corrupt practices.
He also didnt stage repeated attacks on civil liberties, nor did he pack the Lords with cronies and donors whilst simultaneously encouraging attacks on it as a non-democratic body.
He also liked cricket.
Compare his record to New Labour who have doubled spending on health and education and increased funding for transport and regeneration of inner cities.



Major was and is a cunt. Just look at what he does for a living now.
Johnson would have to replace him - trade union background etc, I do wonder if he got moved to the Home Office because it's something of a poisoned chalice - like moving Burnham to Health just before the Hillsborough papers were published.
Ugh! Look, it's a Tory!![]()
This is the site of the fellow who first suspected brown was on anti-depressants
www.notbornyesterday.org
what an appallingly bad website.
Anyone else see kinnock interviewed last night? On newsnight I think. He quoted bloody Gramsci, the cheeky bastard.