Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton Coach to Stop the BNP "Festival"

You can't blame me if the Labour party aren't up to the job of the left.

So ... we don't even have any credible left wing political parties? No wonder the left are disengaged from the public and the right are winning.
who's blaming you mr paranoid! Labour haven't been left wing for years now that you don't know this shows how out of touch you are
 
So what you're saying is that there are no left wing political parties that stand the slightest chance of ever being voted in at present.
 
Why some on the left spend their political lives following a tiny party like the BNP around, beats me. The BNP just came 7th in the by election in Norwich, the two MEPs they got was because of the PR voting system.
They have a handful of councillors out of a possible ten's of thousands.

It is UKIP who are on a roll, 13 MEPs, and now they are starting to win council by elections.
They have achieved this by putting immigration as one of their main concerns.
During the Norwich by election I am told UKIP's leaflets mentioned immigration more than did the BNP's!

UKIP are putting themselves forward as a milder version of the BNP, and it is working for them to an extent.
So, if you want to follow a political party around because they are fascists, then UKIP should be picketed.

Although I don't know why those on the left with a BNP fetish, don't instead spend more time putting up a left party for elections.
 
Although I don't know why those on the left with a BNP fetish, don't instead spend more time putting up a left party for elections.

Because it's easier to complain about it and try to disrupt people voting for a legitimate political party through the democratic system, than organise a credible alternative to vote for.
 
They get their fucking nazi heads kicked in,they did have limited impacted at the last ever GLC gig at County Hall,down to our complacency,not their planning.But still ended up getting trashed.
The only platform for nazis has a rope one end and a trap door the other.

One of the most facistic things I've ever read on here. Not in my name linerider.
 
they
The left tried and failed because fucking liberals stood back and did nothing while the right came to power and millions died because of the inaction of people arguing the same things as you(and NO I'm not blaming you for WW2,just that for every inaction a terrible action has a chance of happening)

How dare you hide behind the sacrifices of millions in an attempt to justify your own supprt for violence and intimidation.
 
Hmmm... look at the photo's almost everyone in there was in or around the SWP (how do you upload photos?) Quite confident to claim it as I was one of the three people who lead the charge through the door.

Apart from much of the event being orchaestrated, security let in sit down protesters on the basis of Health & Safety, that is complete bollox.

The only thing that SWP did at that demonstration was lead a bulk of the demonstrators walking around in circles taking them away from the front gate.
 
... or it could just be that people have seen 'the left' in action in government for a number of years now, decided it isn't working, and are looking at the alternatives.
the continuation of a surprising number of conservative policies, and spending plans, were the hallmark of the early years of the blair administration. followed by an alliance between blair and a right-wing yankee administration. personally, i haven't seen anything 'left-wing' in what the labour party's done, and a great deal which is simply corrupt ('reform' of the house of lords), stupid, inept, or downright barking. a left-wing government would have done something positive for the millennium instead of wasting hundreds of millions on the dome. education and housing would have been priorities instead of downgraded. transport would have been integrated instead of fucked. even the one possible success blair had, in the six counties, was a) imo not a success, and b) much down to the work of others, notably john major, albert reynolds, gerry adams and john hume.

The success of a political party is based purely on addressing the needs of the electorate in persuading them to vote for them. Nothing more, nothing less. A lot of it may be down to 'spin' but most of it will be their policies.
no it isn't. people don't read manifestos. i've tried and given up. people vote for the best of a bad bunch, or they vote for a party to send a rocket up the establishment, be that party ukip or bnp. the bnp's a special case here, because they have received so much free publicity, because they appear as an anti-party party, and because the electorate to which they appeal has been abandoned by other parties. it's certainly not down to their ideas convincing, in the same way that the other parties don't convince.

As you seem to be concentrating on the BNP, a lot of people do see a variety of problems with the amount of immigration into the UK. Whilst "send 'em all 'ome" is not necessarily the best solution, the other extreme of "let anyone in regardless" is not the solution either. But what are the mainstream parties offering as their solutions?
immigration's a troublesome issue. there is a need to let people in: the aging population's going to need younger people in it, and if we're not prepared to breed them, where else are they going to come from? i agree that the no borders approach is stupid - however, until there's a debate about immigration in which the facts and not the fears are discussed then you're going to have a polarisation of the argument.

You do have to also remember that 'the left' is as much part of the problem; anyone talking about immigration immediately gets branded a racist, or similar, so people are now afraid to even talk about the issue, and when people are afraid to talk about the issue in normal conversation, that's when the extremes tend to come out because they aren't afraid to talk about it - and "hmm they're saying what I'm thinking" is how people respond.
no, as i mentioned it's more "hmm they're talking about what i fear". the whole of society has gone from being resilient about risk to being extremely risk averse. this manifests itself in discussions about immigration as much as it does about health and safety or terrorism.

The success of the BNP is nothing to do with big budgets, slick spin doctors, or even necessarily their policies - I'd say it's more down to mainstream politics losing touch with the electorate and being unable or unwilling to come up with a solution to counteract it.
to an extent. but the mainstream parties haven't lost touch with the electorate, not all of it. they have lost touch with large parts of the white working class, which has frankly been denigrated for many years. it's a mark imo of the tolerance of the white working class that it's taken so long for fascist parties to make any impact, and even now that impact's within a minority of the wwc.

it's true that the mainstream parties have no idea of how to combat the bnp. instead by describing them as beyond the pale they establish a clear dividing line between them and the bnp, one which the bnp has taken full advantage of. however, the bnp are very much a griffin party, not a resilient party like the conservatives or lib dems.

In fact, you could even say that the rise of the right is the result of the failure of the left through years of political correctness and fighting for an 'open doors' kind of policy. Therefore, perhaps those on the political left should be putting more effort into seeing how to make their point of view more accepted by the mainstream, rather than attacking and attempting to silence those who are, after all, only operating within the same democratic system of freedom of speech and thought as you are.
this is not about immigration as such, it is about the way in which immigration's portrayed, which is a separate thing. it is about the way in which people fear the factors which affect them in their everyday lives are going to be impacted by immigration. but the rise of the bnp offers people as many solutions to their real problems as does the continuing dominance of the major parties, which is to say none.

Or are you not pro-democracy?
what we have in this country is very far from democracy.
 
One of the most facistic things I've ever read on here. Not in my name linerider.
Ok maybe the hanging bit was a bit over the top,but as someone who has fought against the far right for well over 30 years,I couldn't believe that we're going through this again.I blame the atitude of ajdown and drcarnage who accept groups like the bnp as part of the political landscape and not the cancer that they are. :mad:
 
I'm sure many people would suggest that groups like the SWP, Respect and all the other leftie minority loonspud parties are just as bad as the BNP.

At least the BNP managed to get voted in somewhere, which I think is more than the SWP have ever achieved.
 
How dare you hide behind the sacrifices of millions in an attempt to justify your own supprt for violence and intimidation.
what a wanker you are,I was saying that if people had stood up against the Nazis in the early 30's there might well not have been WW2.appeasement didn't work then and it doesn't work now.
 
At least the BNP managed to get voted in somewhere, which I think is more than the SWP have ever achieved.

The Social Workers have had one local councillor elected (and re-elected) in Preston. He has not stood as a candidate for the Social Workers Party. He first stood for the Socialist Alliance and managed to get the support of a locally influential Muslim cleric. With the mosque vote, he unexpectedly won! He was later re-elected as a candidate for al-Respeq - the party for Muslims.
 
The Social Workers have had one local councillor elected (and re-elected) in Preston. He has not stood as a candidate for the Social Workers Party. He first stood for the Socialist Alliance and managed to get the support of a locally influential Muslim cleric. With the mosque vote, he unexpectedly won! He was later re-elected as a candidate for al-Respeq - the party for Muslims.
in 1990 i was told by a swappie that the reason the swp didn't stand in elections was that the last time they had (1976, iirc) they were roundly defeated.
 
They get their fucking nazi heads kicked in,they did have limited impacted at the last ever GLC gig at County Hall,down to our complacency,not their planning.But still ended up getting trashed.
The only platform for nazis has a rope one end and a trap door the other.

If you are going to hang someone, this would be no use unless it was a very small platform.*

You need the rope OVER the trapdoor otherwise it just won't work.

I've drawn a diagram with my biro on a bit of paper I found in my wallet but I don't know how to upload that. If you PM me your address I can post it though.

Hope this is helpful come the Revolution.

*eta I did a bit of research using a Kit Kat wrapper rolled into a tube shape to represent the hangee and a little hole at the back of the computer desk to represent the trapdoor. It depends where the rope anchor point is in relation to the centre of the trapdoor. At any great distance sideways for this (ie if the rope anchor is offset by about 1.5m) you will still do harm to the hangee but there will be a lot of grazing. They will probllablbly strangle but you won't get a clean neck break. Bigger offsets, like say a platform length if the platform is big enough to be used for political purposes, you might just get the grazing and the hangee lying half in and half out of the trapdoor.

It's up to you.

By the way, I want to be People's Commisar for Beer, Crisps and Unguents.


CC
 
in 1990 i was told by a swappie that the reason the swp didn't stand in elections was that the last time they had (1976, iirc) they were roundly defeated.

That's undoubtedly true, though the Social Worker who admitted that to you was a bit more honest that most. The standard line was to jeer at 'electoralism'.
 
That's undoubtedly true, though the Social Worker who admitted that to you was a bit more honest that most. The standard line was to jeer at 'electoralism'.
he was trying to recruit me. which may have led to greater candour than usual.
 
At least the BNP have the sense not to go campaigning in Brixton - which is more than can be said for the SWP table that clogs up somewhere in the high street most weekends.
 
At least the BNP have the sense not to go campaigning in Brixton - which is more than can be said for the SWP table that clogs up somewhere in the high street most weekends.
so you won't recall the time in the 90s when the swappies put it about that the bnp were going to descend on brixton, causing widespread concern and me and some other anti-fascists to get taken for nf walking down railton road to the old 121. a pleasant afternoon in brady's ensued but no sign of the bnp - who were never going to turn up - leading to the swp declaring victory.
 
so you won't recall the time in the 90s when the swappies put it about that the bnp were going to descend on brixton, causing widespread concern and me and some other anti-fascists to get taken for nf walking down railton road to the old 121. a pleasant afternoon in brady's ensued but no sign of the bnp - who were never going to turn up - leading to the swp declaring victory.
The bnp did say that they were going to march from brixton to stockwell(i think they must have been listening to the Wall).I think they said it for effect rather than having any real intension of going through with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom