OK. But are we going to see more launches as a result of the reduced cost, offsetting any savings?
OK, but there is still the noise issue. Maybe we can find somewhere remote enough....
Sure. By junk I meant *disused* satellites. The cheaper they are to launch and hence to replace, the more likely firms are to abandon them at the drop of a hat...
Nope. It is all rocket engine, it's just that it takes its oxidiser from the atmosphere while it can. It's quite simple, look:It's not going to necessarily be any nosier than a normal aeroplane as it will take off using normal jet engines and will only use rockets when in the upper atmosphere and space.


Did this happen yet/did you go?Mark Hempsell (until very recently, Future Programmes director at Reaction Engines) is giving a lecture at the British Interplanetary Society on the future of Skylon. I'm going, and will report the juicy details back here![]()
Yep. Me and Kyzer_Soze went. I got the time wrong and we only caught the last 10m of the Q&A >_<Did this happen yet/did you go?
Looks like this one might be going forward at last:![]()
Hotol lives on!
UK Skylon spaceplane passes key review - BBC News
Sadly, this thing won't be taking off any time soon - it's going to need $9-12bn for that - but it has the potential to offer far cheaper satellite launches.
It would be awesome to have Britain back in the space launching game too.
Looks like this one might be going forward at last:
BAE Systems and Reaction Engines to develop hypersonic space engine
Don't you start, one Pickman's model is quite enough thank you.The two highlighted terms are mutually exclusive.
pedantry alive & wellThe two highlighted terms are mutually exclusive.
Featured in this view of the Orion replica are the mouths of the twin main rocket engines, powered by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. Secondary and tertiary rocket engine nozzles also point toward the tail of the ship. Just aft of the large "Pan Am" logo is a ring of emergency explosive bolts and retrorocket jets, which would be fired to separate the tail section should something go wrong with the main engines.
Rectangular outlets are visible on the top surface of the wings, presumably for atmospheric flight. The raised fins along the rear edge of the wings are "wing fences" that control airflow when Orion travels faster than Mach 1 (the speed of sound).
Some inspiration:The underside of the Orion replica. At the wing tips are clear parts representing the anti-collision strobe lights. The ridged trapezoid-shaped plate between the wings is a hypersonic airflow correction plate. Forward and rear landing-gear doors are also visible. The underside of Orion features a titanium heat shield for heat dissipation when returning through Earth's atmosphere
Concept sketch of the German Silverbird suborbital bomber from World War II. Austrian-German engineer Eugen Sänger's concept of a plane that could travel around the world was developed for the Nazi war effort. The plane, called "Silverbird," would have been propelled by a rocket sled, taking off from a 2-mile-long (3.2 kilometers) inclined ramp. Silverbird would pass above the United States to drop its bomb, and then skip around the world to a landing site in Japan.
Space: 2025. The British rocket-powered Skylon space plane would ascend from a runway on air-breathing rocket boosters. When the air becomes too thin, Skylon switches to onboard tanks of liquid oxygen. The craft could carry 30 passengers to a space station in Earth orbit, fulfilling the dream of routine access to space depicted in "2001."
And maybe we'll be getting something like it soon!
The HOTOL/Skylon project has been around for 35 years in various forms without ever producing anything so don't hold your breath.
REL’s Skylon spaceplane aims to take on SpaceX with a reusable rocket designWhen air comes into the SABRE, it gets cooled down with liquid helium. The helium has itself been cooled via an exchanger that uses the liquid hydrogen fuel. Once the helium is done pre-cooling the air, it gets heated again by the combustion of the hydrogen and oxygen, and that energy drives the turbines in the engine. The combined mechanism saves weight and allows the engine to work from a resting start.
The company plans to test the engines this year; the tests will be on the ground, essentially firing them to see if they work as planned.
Mark Ford, head of propulsion engineering at the European Space Agency, says there’s no reason the SABRE shouldn’t work."We saw no technological or engineering showstoppers," Ford says. A 2011 report from ESA said the idea is feasible.
While engines are the most important part of the craft, other challenges still give experts pause. Heat is one. The Space Shuttle had to be covered with tiles because most metals wouldn’t handle the heat generated by re-entry. "We called it the crockery-covered spacecraft," said Ivan Bekey, a former head of the Advanced Concepts Office at NASA and now a private design consultant. "If you’re flying at 25 times the speed of sound then for a spaceplane the heat becomes a problem for the ascent as well."
