Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

British Fascism and How to Fight It

How about looking at the Nazis and seeing what good they did for the Germans? which amounts to very little.

Take unemployment for example.
By the end of 1930 unemployment was 4 million, 15.3 per cent of the population. 1932 over 30 per cent of the German workforce was unemployed.
German economy recovered in 1933 a bit when Hitler came to power , weather that was due to them is still debated to this day?? A lot say its was just coincidence that he was elected then.
labour-saving machinery was partly banned to increase manual work ,employers were very restricted and firing people needed government permission . By 1937 German unemployment had gone down from 6 million to 1 million but the standard of living for those working did not improve in the same way that it started in the 1920s. The Nazis controlled the labour unions, wages were not higher due to more productivity.

Adam Tooze's "The Wages of Destruction" goes into the economics of Nazi Germany in great (and interesting) detail.
 
No thought what-so-fucking-ever towards what roles certain drugs have played within human development in history or anything like that.

Yeah exactly, I suppose derf thinks the Germanic and Celtic tribes of the dark ages where actually running a magic mushroom and rye bread racket and funding cross border crime waves... or the Native Americans who used various hallucogentic subsutances where actually contributing to the pre-Columbian Mexican drug war :D.
 
A convert indeed.
I'm openly right wing with the limitations I have mentioned.
I am an ex pat and have no problem with paying someone to help me get a better lifestyle.
Who's the twit I wonder. Daft sods working their way to a retirement of poverty until they die or me who retired at 45 to the sun?

Some people are bosses and some get exploited.
That's the way of the world. Live with it baby. :)

sure, and now you've made your millions you hang around on msg boards talking crap with people you don't know and clearly have no respect for you - keep dreaming whacko
 
And that catch-all reference covers it all folks. No thought what-so-fucking-ever towards what roles certain drugs have played within human development in history or anything like that. Just the black and white argument that if you buy drugs, you fund criminality. The here and now. Cops good, users, bad.

I tell you what derf, attempt to grow a mind because I'd like to have a chat with you once you do. You've got the potential to be interesting.

Assumptions are not good arguing points.

Rec drugs are a black and white choice. Simple as that. unless you are addicted you have the choice every time you go out. If you choose to buy them you are supporting the criminal element and all they get up to.

As for human development other than a few poets and th like I don't really know what mind altering drugs have done for us as a species.
Having said that I'm a philistine and consider most poetry to be total wank.
Now some of the artists have dabbed some nice paint in the right places on canvass. Maybe I'm not such a philistine after all.

I would be interested in some examples of drug users doing good for mankind in general and their contribution to human development.
 
VP is that a book that is still in print?

Yep, went to paperback after the first two eds in hardback (hardback published by Allen Lane. Pub info is:

Title: The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy.
Author: Adam Tooze.
Publisher: Penguin.
Price: £12.99.
ISBN: 978-0-141-00348-1.

It has a very good bibliography too.
 
Good book, very useful. There's a really important one Economy and class structure of German fascism by Alfred Sohn-Rethel - he was a marxist economist who worked in the MWT (CBI equivalent) for most of the nazi period (also doing underground resistance work) who edited the paper that business printed for itself (i.e not available to anyone else) that contained the real accurate figures and developments, not the regimes PR. I think it was the first book the Conference of Socialist Economists published as well.
 
Good book, very useful. There's a really important one Economy and class structure of German fascism by Alfred Sohn-Rethel - he was a marxist economist who worked in the MWT (CBI equivalent) for most of the nazi period (also doing underground resistance work) who edited the paper that business printed for itself (i.e not available to anyone else) that contained the real accurate figures and developments, not the regimes PR. I think it was the first book the Conference of Socialist Economists published as well.

I've had that on my "buy, beg, borrow or steal" list for a while. I think I'll go have a browse on Abe...

BTW, quick brain-pick: Any ideas on a book's author and title that fit the following description?
Female author, book is about the consequences of the treaty of Versailles, how the German state and establishment manipulated the guilt issue, and how historians "revised" the issue, up to and including rubbishing much of the post-WW2 analysis done by the German "baby-boomer" generation.

I read this book a couple of years ago, but can't for the life of me remember enough to get myself a copy. :o
 
I would be interested in some examples of drug users doing good for mankind in general and their contribution to human development.

George Bush never took LSD. Bill Hicks did.

Which of the two has had the worst effect on the planet, Derf?
 
I've had that on my "buy, beg, borrow or steal" list for a while. I think I'll go have a browse on Abe...

BTW, quick brain-pick: Any ideas on a book's author and title that fit the following description?
Female author, book is about the consequences of the treaty of Versailles, how the German state and establishment manipulated the guilt issue, and how historians "revised" the issue, up to and including rubbishing much of the post-WW2 analysis done by the German "baby-boomer" generation.

I read this book a couple of years ago, but can't for the life of me remember enough to get myself a copy. :o

Not ringing any bells i'm afraid. This might interest you though:

The Long-range tactical critical theory sessions return on Friday 9th January 2009 at 7.30pm at The Lucas Arms, Grays Inn Road, London. The nearest tube is Kings Cross.

30 years ago Alfred Sohn-Rethel, heroic anti-Nazi and forgotten associate of the Frankfurt School, published Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology (London 1978). Sohn-Rethel, grounded the emergence of Western philosophy in an ‘autonomous intellect’ separated from manual labour and production - a separation effected by ‘the exchange mechanism through which man loses control over the social process’.

GM Tamas says in The Uniqueness of Capitalism and the Normative Content of a Socialist Political Philosophy, that Sohn-Rethel ’theorises a capitalist order which is primordial vis-à-vis knowledge and being, an order that cannot be shown as a subject-matter, topic, theme or problem of philosophy because it is philosophy itself.’

Sohn-Rethel argued that the crucial link between abstract labour and the division between ‘head and hand’ in the capitalist workplace required a ‘methodogical postulate’ for confronting the core issues of philosophy - and vice versa. David Black of the online journal Hobgoblin will argue that 30 years on, we can see how the crisis in socialist thought indicates that the issues Sohn-Rethel raised still need to be addressed.

Bit pointy headed though.
 
ok it is fair to say that the far right can be classified as nazis so what is the point of your classification apart raising the point of WHO you classify as memebers of the bnp which looking around urban usually consists of adopting chav like stereo type questioning there IQ and ultimately alienating the very peole the left need to connect to to effectivly fight facsim


terific:rolleyes:
the left me to concentrate on connecting with people who vote fascist?
:rolleyes:
 
What is the fucking point of all this?

The BNP has no MPs, 0.3 per cent of all council seats and some 2,000 members. Are they a threat to the political life of this country? Are they fuck.

I'll wager their exposure and attractiveness is increased by the children who call themselves anti-fascists and chant inanities outside their meeting halls.
 
What is the fucking point of all this?

The BNP has no MPs, 0.3 per cent of all council seats and some 2,000 members. Are they a threat to the political life of this country? Are they fuck.

I'll wager their exposure and attractiveness is increased by the children who call themselves anti-fascists and chant inanities outside their meeting halls.

That's 12,000 members.
 
Assumptions are not good arguing points.

Rec drugs are a black and white choice. Simple as that. unless you are addicted you have the choice every time you go out. If you choose to buy them you are supporting the criminal element and all they get up to.

As for human development other than a few poets and th like I don't really know what mind altering drugs have done for us as a species.
Having said that I'm a philistine and consider most poetry to be total wank.
Now some of the artists have dabbed some nice paint in the right places on canvass. Maybe I'm not such a philistine after all.

I would be interested in some examples of drug users doing good for mankind in general and their contribution to human development.


Drugs have given us cheech and chong.
 
What is the fucking point of all this?

The BNP has no MPs, 0.3 per cent of all council seats and some 2,000 members. Are they a threat to the political life of this country? Are they fuck.

I'll wager their exposure and attractiveness is increased by the children who call themselves anti-fascists and chant inanities outside their meeting halls.

But that doesn't mean they don't have potential. The nazi party had was a nothingness at one point and look what fucking havoc that bunch of pricks managed to cause.
The BNP are fighting above their weight as they have the unspoken support of a good bunch of tabloids with their "pakis eat children" type shit that passes for a news story.
Keep a close eye on the fuckers. I may be out of the country with no intention of returning but I don't need a set of bastards like the BNP ruining it for the people still there.
 
Assumptions are not good arguing points.

Rec drugs are a black and white choice. Simple as that. unless you are addicted you have the choice every time you go out. If you choose to buy them you are supporting the criminal element and all they get up to.
so legalise them. Just like with prohibition in America, it is the government that is supporting the criminal element.

As for human development other than a few poets and th like I don't really know what mind altering drugs have done for us as a species.
Having said that I'm a philistine and consider most poetry to be total wank.
Now some of the artists have dabbed some nice paint in the right places on canvass. Maybe I'm not such a philistine after all.

I would be interested in some examples of drug users doing good for mankind in general and their contribution to human development.
drugs reduce a lot of pain caused by spinal injury, which makes me a more productive member of society. But you are completely missing the point. Why should marijuana be illegal, there are many things which are legal which don't necessarily contribute to human development. Why single out marijuana?
 
I find it funny that a lot of people keep saying "look out for the BNP, they're small now but they could get bigger" but we all know that they'll never get into power.

I mean, we humans are doing so much damage to this earth and the "save our planet" message receives far more coverage in the media and elsewhere than anti-racism yet the Green party are still tiny. It's a two party system, always has and always will under FPTP.

So, in conclusion, yes we must fight the BNP but don't kid ourselves into thinking they'll seize power.
 
I find it funny that a lot of people keep saying "look out for the BNP, they're small now but they could get bigger" but we all know that they'll never get into power.

I mean, we humans are doing so much damage to this earth and the "save our planet" message receives far more coverage in the media and elsewhere than anti-racism yet the Green party are still tiny. It's a two party system, always has and always will under FPTP.

So, in conclusion, yes we must fight the BNP but don't kid ourselves into thinking they'll seize power.
thats what they said about adolf, but the credit crunch then, was ONE of the factors that contributed to turn the " but we all know that they'll never get into power" 'logic', on its head. Plus in the here and now the election of fascists is used by the media/etc to 'justify' the immigration rantings.
 
The best way to fight fascism would be to stay away from Unite against fascism etc and work within your own community. Get active building up a grass root collective to help the community from all angles, soup kitchens for the poor, bicycle repair workshops for the kids,social centers,etc

I know you think Im talking bollocks but this is where I stand lol.
no you are talking sense in my imho
 
thats what they said about adolf, but the credit crunch then, was ONE of the factors that contributed to turn the " but we all know that they'll never get into power" 'logic', on its head. Plus in the here and now the election of fascists is used by the media/etc to 'justify' the immigration rantings.

Are you trying to say the situation in 1930's Germany is comparable to the situation we have today in the UK?

You're in cuckoo land if you believe that and you're even more in cuckoo land if you think the BNP will get anywhere close to seizing power.
 
Yep. It's bonkers. As pointed out time and again on here, the danger of the BNP is not a march on London and a powerr grab but a slow steady colonisation of the political space opened up by the abandonment of w/c communities by the mainstream parties and a poisoning of the well, so that class based politics are removed in favour of racialising social issues - to that racialisation becoming normalised, becoming how people habitually do 'politics'. It's that simple. Any talk about then taking power is political idiocy.
 
Back
Top Bottom