A Room for Romeo Brass
Dead Man's Shoes
This is England
It's hard to describe the feeling you are left with after watching these films, such thought provocking, intriguing and shocking films that you will never forget. Will have to watch Meadow's other films but he's certainly one of the best directors to come out of Britain that's for sure.
Why the fuck doesn't he hire some PROPER ACTORS!?!?!![]()
That's because I hate Shane Meadows. He's FUCKING SHITE.HiASL is swearing lots, just like in Brit flicks
I KNOW!
I know it's all this, 'ooh we'll imrpov to make it realistic'
NO it just makes everyone look uncomfortable and mumbly and amdram.
It's just embarrassing. I feel ashamed for everyone involved. My fucking cheeks are burning here.I KNOW!
I know it's all this, 'ooh we'll imrpov to make it realistic'
NO it just makes everyone look uncomfortable and mumbly and amdram.
No. They. Are. Not.That's how people are.
No. They. Are. Not.
That's how people are.
They're all wooden. None of the people I know are wooden. Well - not many.They are more often than they're tightly scripted insights and hmm..interesting views that make re-think my views.
dead man's shoes ftw.
pisses all over this is england - which is good in itself - but dead man'sshoes is a bloody amazing film.
what are we classifying as british, btw?
brit financed?, produced? helmed?
They're all wooden. None of the people I know are wooden. Well - not many.
I'd rather watch the most preposterous flights of fancy than half-baked stories ful of characters who just don't ring true.
Mike Leigh's great,
I think that the most preposterous flights of fancy just don't ring true. I also don't think it's an either/or option.
Flights of fancy aren't meant to ring true - isn't that the point? No, it's not either/or, but I'll go anywhere but to Shame Meadows for my dose of vicarious reality.I think that the most preposterous flights of fancy just don't ring true. I also don't think it's an either/or option.
Today?
Flights of fancy aren't meant to ring true - isn't that the point? No, it's not either/or, but I'll go anywhere but to Shame Meadows for my dose of vicarious reality.
Ha. 'Shame'. That was a typo - but I'll keep it.
Come again?How does that mean that they can't be expressed by characters that don't ring true? That's the point.

It's not an either/or, no.
But I still think the acting in This is England is really contrived and like I said, I was so aware of them acting the whole time I couldn't lose myself in the story.
Is it acting or are other styles of acting just more what people are used to, and most films following the signs for this is how you show normal. On the script this is especially telling.
Come again?![]()
Nah I don't think it's got anything to do with what I'm used to.
I don't mind people using the improvisation technique if it's done well, I just don't think it was here. I think you have to have exceedingly good actors to make it work, it jsut seemed really forced and unnatural and try-hard.
From that list, there seems to be an acceptable amount of decent films:
Son Of Rambow,
Man On Wire,
In Bruges,
Garage,
The Dark Knight


Well yes, it all comes down to the standard of the cast. With This is England, the script is half-decent - cliched as fuck, but half-decent - but you can barely see it for flying splinters every time one of the mannequins opens their gobs. One-dimensional, paper-thin characterisations that just don't pertain to reality.The most preposterous flights of fancy can be expressed by characters that don't ring true, the same as the wooden dialouge expressed by crap characters you rejected eariler. It's the crap charecters that are the larger problem.