Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brit flicks: the kite mark of shite

A Room for Romeo Brass
Dead Man's Shoes
This is England

It's hard to describe the feeling you are left with after watching these films, such thought provocking, intriguing and shocking films that you will never forget. Will have to watch Meadow's other films but he's certainly one of the best directors to come out of Britain that's for sure.

dead man's shoes ftw.

pisses all over this is england - which is good in itself - but dead man'sshoes is a bloody amazing film.

what are we classifying as british, btw?

brit financed?, produced? helmed?
 
There are some great British flicks. More bad ones than good, but that's universal.
The first recent one to spring to mind is Hunger, which is very very impressive.
 
They are more often than they're tightly scripted insights and hmm..interesting views that make re-think my views.
They're all wooden. None of the people I know are wooden. Well - not many.

I'd rather watch the most preposterous flights of fancy than half-baked stories ful of characters who just don't ring true.
 
dead man's shoes ftw.

pisses all over this is england - which is good in itself - but dead man'sshoes is a bloody amazing film.

what are we classifying as british, btw?

brit financed?, produced? helmed?

And that is the problem. For example Garage

Is down on britfilms.com. But It's an Irish Director, Irish Writer, Irish Producer, Irish Cast, Irish Location, in fact the Editor, Sound recordist, DoP, and Production Company are all Irish. In fact I think it's considered British because it's partially funded by some British Executives, which is pretty fucking cheeky.

Oh and Garage is fucking excellent.
 
Mike Leigh's great, even though it's largely played for laughs. Ken Loach is great. Even Nil by Mouth is great.

Shane Meadows is fucking wank.
 
They're all wooden. None of the people I know are wooden. Well - not many.

I'd rather watch the most preposterous flights of fancy than half-baked stories ful of characters who just don't ring true.

I think that the most preposterous flights of fancy just don't ring true. I also don't think it's an either/or option.
 
I think that the most preposterous flights of fancy just don't ring true. I also don't think it's an either/or option.

It's not an either/or, no.

But I still think the acting in This is England is really contrived and like I said, I was so aware of them acting the whole time I couldn't lose myself in the story.
 
I think that the most preposterous flights of fancy just don't ring true. I also don't think it's an either/or option.
Flights of fancy aren't meant to ring true - isn't that the point? No, it's not either/or, but I'll go anywhere but to Shame Meadows for my dose of vicarious reality.

Ha. 'Shame'. That was a typo - but I'll keep it.
 
Flights of fancy aren't meant to ring true - isn't that the point? No, it's not either/or, but I'll go anywhere but to Shame Meadows for my dose of vicarious reality.

Ha. 'Shame'. That was a typo - but I'll keep it.

How does that mean that they can't be expressed by characters that don't ring true? That's the point.
 
Jim Jarmusch is the best example of the ad-libbing thing being used to make actors put in great performances I can think of. When you think of it done properly like that, it does make Shane Meadows stuff look pretty shite
 
From that list, there seems to be an acceptable amount of decent films:
Son Of Rambow, Man On Wire, In The Shadow Of The Moon, In Bruges, Mark Of Cain, It's A Free World, Scott Walker: 30th Century Man, Poppy Shakespeare, Joy Division, Joe Strummer: The Future Is Unwritten, Garage, Ghosts, Hallam Foe, Of Time & The City, Boy A, The Dark Knight and Control. That's not bad is it?
 
It's not an either/or, no.

But I still think the acting in This is England is really contrived and like I said, I was so aware of them acting the whole time I couldn't lose myself in the story.

Is it acting or are other styles of acting just more what people are used to, and most films following the signs for this is how you show normal. On the script this is especially telling.
 
Is it acting or are other styles of acting just more what people are used to, and most films following the signs for this is how you show normal. On the script this is especially telling.

Nah I don't think it's got anything to do with what I'm used to.

I don't mind people using the improvisation technique if it's done well, I just don't think it was here. I think you have to have exceedingly good actors to make it work, it jsut seemed really forced and unnatural and try-hard.
 
Nah I don't think it's got anything to do with what I'm used to.

I don't mind people using the improvisation technique if it's done well, I just don't think it was here. I think you have to have exceedingly good actors to make it work, it jsut seemed really forced and unnatural and try-hard.

Fair dos. I didn't actually like the film myself, but i thought the acting was one of the things that saved it, made it more than the usual one persons visions they needed to express bollocks.
 
Fair enough - I was just going by the list.
I liked Son Of Rambow, mittaged or not :p
But that's still a good haul for such a small cash-strapped industry.
Interesting that a fair few of them are documentaries.
 
The most preposterous flights of fancy can be expressed by characters that don't ring true, the same as the wooden dialouge expressed by crap characters you rejected eariler. It's the crap charecters that are the larger problem.
Well yes, it all comes down to the standard of the cast. With This is England, the script is half-decent - cliched as fuck, but half-decent - but you can barely see it for flying splinters every time one of the mannequins opens their gobs. One-dimensional, paper-thin characterisations that just don't pertain to reality.

With Dead Man's Shoes, the storyline was as preposterous as the acting. But still, Bruce Willis would have made it work. So that was his mistake there - not hiring Bruce Willis.
 
Back
Top Bottom