Break leg-3 match ban. Be a gobshite-3 match ban *non applicable to England players
- Thread starter Relahni
- Start date
Red Faction
Allez Les Rouges
Rio Ferdinand doing what he does best and not getting booked:
Taken by yours truly.
what sort of moron are you?
you're comparing the captain having a quiet word with the referee, to having a ref mobbed by angry primadonnas
judge taylor on what he did- he mis-timed a tackle
he didnt mean to break eduardo's leg, the FA dont levy fines for breaking people legs
it was a freak accident. get over it.
the behaviour of football players (and fans) has been disgraceful for so long, people have started to think it's normal
the FA's clampdown on abusing referees is too little too late
kained&able
Here for the football.
Stargely liverpool are appealing the extra ban it seems.
http://www.teamtalk.com/football/story/0,16368,2483_3383805,00.html
seem to be saying yeah he did it and it was wrong and very naughty but what the fuck is this extara two macth ban thing thats silly.
They seem to be doing a great job of covering all thier bases.
What you reckon the odds of the fa deciding its a frivilous appeal and adding another match to the ban!
dave
http://www.teamtalk.com/football/story/0,16368,2483_3383805,00.html
seem to be saying yeah he did it and it was wrong and very naughty but what the fuck is this extara two macth ban thing thats silly.
They seem to be doing a great job of covering all thier bases.
What you reckon the odds of the fa deciding its a frivilous appeal and adding another match to the ban!
dave
Deareg
Well-Known Member
you have a good point
kained&able
Here for the football.
revol68
what, fucking what?
for all the whinging about the Boro disallowed goal, the fact is the corner that led to your equaliser should have been a foul to boro.
Swings and roundabouts.
Termite Man
zombie flesh eater
so in the light of no evidence for or against intention to break a leg then I'm afraid it's only right to assume that there was no intention . I have seen fouls just as bad but without the bad luck of a leg breaking commited by a fair few players ( one being an arsenal player but of course he wouldn't deserve a ban for a mistimed tackle would he
) which haven't recieved the same punishment Taylor has got . So in the case of Taylor precedent seems to suggest any ban for him ( and even the red card ) were excessive punishments !
revol68
what, fucking what?
how many fucking times you thick cunt!!!!
He wasn't given a three match ban for dissent, he wasn't sent off for dissent, he was given a second yellow card for constant dissent and recieved the three match ban for bringing the game into disrepute by refusing to leave the pitch, chasing after the ref and having to be dragged off by Max who does the door at the Phoenix Club.
revol68
what, fucking what?
Boro's goal wasn't offside not in the modern approach to offside.
Deareg
Well-Known Member
he received 2 yellows, which is only a 1 match ban, revol has politely explained where the other 2 matches came from
oh go away you brain dead little boy - I was talking about the other matter
staright red cards - which you would have understood if you could read and take in sentences properly
staright red cards - which you would have understood if you could read and take in sentences properly
how many fucking times you thick cunt!!!!
He wasn't given a three match ban for dissent, he wasn't sent off for dissent, he was given a second yellow card for constant dissent and recieved the three match ban for bringing the game into disrepute by refusing to leave the pitch, chasing after the ref and having to be dragged off by Max who does the door at the Phoenix Club.
revol68
what, fucking what?
the other matter of what exactly?
the time he got sent off in an under 12 game?
and seriously the quote you are responding to goes at the top ffs!
revol68
what, fucking what?
no it wasn't and that's why the linesman never flagged it.
it's hardly the refs fault your defence completely went to sleep.
no - you moronic twit - the straight red that Aliadiere got - as I said red cards should be assessed - straight ones
now if you were capable of reading a whole paragraph and digesting information, you would have understood that.
now if you were capable of reading a whole paragraph and digesting information, you would have understood that.
the other matter of what exactly?
the time he got sent off in an under 12 game?
and seriously the quote you are responding to goes at the top ffs!
no it wasn't - he didn't flag because he didn't see it
all 3 pundits on tv said it was offside under any rules
all 3 pundits on tv said it was offside under any rules
revol68
what, fucking what?
eh no, you followed your whinge about a three match ban by whinging about dissent not being nearly as bad as taylor's tackle and considering this thread is about Mascherano's ban...
The rules are simple, straight red you get a three match ban, two yellows you miss one, act like an utter mental fuckwit and refuse to leave the pitch and face the chance of further suspension by bringing the game into disrepute.
revol68
what, fucking what?
no they didn't, what they said was that the modern rules are too complex and open to too wide of subjective interpretation.
The goal wasn't offside cos the player who was in an offside position wasn't interfering when the pass was made and ran back into an onside position in the second phase of play.
You can argue about what constitutes interfering with play and even throw up the tiresome cliche of 'What are you doing on the pitch if you aren't' but under the current rules the linesman was quite right to allow it.
revol68
what, fucking what?
right, whatever but in the name of Jesus, Mary, Joseph and all the fucking Saints will you learn to put the fucking quote before your fucking response!
I said red cards should be assessed - like they used to be. Because straight reds are given for varying degrees of sin, in my view there should not be automatic 3 match bans. Aliadieres straight red was a joke.
And you always have to introduce appalling language which would tend to suggest you struggle to use any alternatives.
And you always have to introduce appalling language which would tend to suggest you struggle to use any alternatives.
eh no, you followed your whinge about a three match ban by whinging about dissent not being nearly as bad as taylor's tackle and considering this thread is about Mascherano's ban...
The rules are simple, straight red you get a three match ban, two yellows you miss one, act like an utter mental fuckwit and refuse to leave the pitch and face the chance of further suspension by bringing the game into disrepute.
no and I rest my case with regard to your language.
right, whatever but in the name of Jesus, Mary, Joseph and all the fucking Saints will you learn to put the fucking quote before your fucking response!
Rollem
two kinds of wonderful
right, whatever but in the name of Jesus, Mary, Joseph and all the fucking Saints will you learn to put the fucking quote before your fucking response!
which saints are the ones fucking then?
there is never an excuse to use language like that in my view. I know it's the norm on these forums but that's because 80% are grammatically challenged and couldn't tell you the difference between your and you're - I don't think you have that problem.
