Smoky said:That is unfortunate, still, as the commentator rightly said, it's consistent refereeing which is something that hasn't happened this whole tournament.
Idaho said:If the referee had been fair and Ghana had an ounce of finishing in them it would have been a comfortable victory.
wiskey said:kingson must be knackered. he's pulled off some good saves.
i rekkon theres a forcefeild around the brisilian goal - nothing will go in![]()

editor said:How many goals do you reckon Ghana would have stuffed past England?
Genghis Cohen said:Brazil are beatable, if Ghana's line wasnt so high and as someone said, they could finish/had a bit of luck, they could have won.
Relahni said:Jeez, that's a lot of ifs.
Put the ball in the net then there is no ifs or buts.
Fidel said:Innit
Relahni said:Jeez, that's a lot of ifs.
Put the ball in the net then there is no ifs or buts.

Relahni said:Jeez, that's a lot of ifs.
Put the ball in the net then there is no ifs or buts.

E.J. said:In otherwords finishing your chances than the opposition that mostly wins matches at the top level. And that was the difference between Ghana and Brasil (Brazil)
editor said:How many goals do you reckon Ghana would have stuffed past England?
Sure, but at least they were entertaining.Donna Ferentes said:I got really annoyed with Ghana actually. If you're the underdog you have to keep it tight, keep your head and take your chances and they did none of these.
editor said:How many goals do you reckon Ghana would have stuffed past England?
Donna Ferentes said:I got really annoyed with Ghana actually. If you're the underdog you have to keep it tight, keep your head and take your chances and they did none of these.