frogwoman
Let them eat newts
ViolentPanda said:Apart from being an exceptionally ignorant comment, it's also a pretty dire insult to conscripts' intelligence and state of mind.
where do these people come from, vp?
ViolentPanda said:Apart from being an exceptionally ignorant comment, it's also a pretty dire insult to conscripts' intelligence and state of mind.
Oh right, that must be why Allah has struck down any Muslim scholar who has written commentary on the Quran.Gumby said:If those verses are 'out of context', do put them in context for me.
It is common practice to read the quaran literally as it was intended by its author.
Oh dear.The bible is often in parables and not the direct word of God, but inspired by God, there is much room for interpretation. There in lies the difference, what the quran says - you do, what the bible says- you interpret and embrace
The God of Israel loves sinners, Allah does not... how can this be the same God assuming both are direct quotes from God?
frogwoman said:where do these people come from, vp?

frogwoman said:What makes you think that Allah doesn't love sinners? are you going to start going on about a "moon g-d" next or something?
enquiring minds want to know ...

pmlViolentPanda said:I don't know about a moon g-d, but I know where there's a mooncalf![]()

moono said:Hey , you got to admit that I know how to draw them out of the woodwork.![]()
astronaut said:Extremism begets extremism.
If you learned to be a lot more moderate, then perhaps extremists from the other side wouldn't go at you so readily.
Having said that, gumby does seem an extremist himself -- but perhaps it was moono who provoked him by calling Israel fascist?

frogwoman said:Or maybe they're both as bad as each other?
![]()

Sadly, but not surprisingly, all three cultures—American, Israeli, Palestinian—have now regressed from their more universal and positive elements to a psychological circling of the wagons, a reversion to the certitudes of super-patriotism, “my country right or wrong,” in search of the elemental strengths of inflated nationalism in a time of trouble. But any culture perceiving itself under siege grows less receptive to open-minded and self-reflective examination of its security problems. As a result, none of these cultures has been ready to settle for anything less than “complete victory” cast in an elemental framework of good versus evil. Alternative perspectives that might shake certainty in the total virtue of one’s own position and policies have been quite unwelcome. Yet, this psychological mindset could not be more damaging to prospects for any ultimate accommodation, reconciliation or resolution.
tangentlama said:So boycott both.
Boycott Palestine and Israel.
Or maybe they're both as bad as each other?
Wikipedia said:The God whom Abraham, Ishmael and Ishaq worshipped was the same God the sons of Jacob worshipped and surrendered to. They were called neither Jews nor Arabs in that time, but were considered righteous.
Wikipedia said:References to Ishaq in the Qur'an
* Appraisals for Ishaq: 6:84, 12:6, 19:50, 21:72, 21:73, 37:113, 38:45, 38:46, 38:47
* Ishaq prophecy: 2:133, 2:136, 2:140, 3:84, 4:163, 6:84, 12:6, 19:49, 21:73, 37:112

moono said:It's the topic that attracts arseholes, not me.
Manmasi said:just short sighted. Who the f**k are Sweden?! And, who are you to call Israel a fascist country? Hamas have NO political platform and will crumble and take the Palestinians with them. They are the fascists, they are weak enough to send others as human bombs into Israel but never their own family or friends, watch Paradise Now, and see how these men are, when once of the potential recruits asks 'will someone come and take me?' (i.e after the explosion), the militant waves his hand and says 'yeah, sure, 70 virgins', smirking. Israel has a lot to answer for but has a far better record of human rights record than most Arab countries, I know how that sentecne will excite you, but it's the truth. Whatever, it doesn't really matter, I hardly ever bother post on here as it's pretty tedious, the constant Israel-bashing you do, are you bored?

Moono: In fact, Sweden is correct in that IT IS a prerequisite that participating nations MUST have participated in at least one prior Peace Keeping mission. In the end though that is merely a spin on what has pretty much been consistent Scandanavian policy toawards both Israel and Arabs. All three governments have always been pro Arab and at best, tepid with regards towards Israel.
Regarding the book in question, I do not claim to be familiar enough with it to be able to do that.Gumby said:If those verses are 'out of context', do put them in context for me.
And who is to say that the bible was intended to be read in any other way?Gumby said:It is common practice to read the quaran literally as it was intended by its author.
I would actually say that the bible itself disagrees with you here:The bible is often in parables and not the direct word of God, but inspired by God, there is much room for interpretation. There in lies the difference, what the quran says - you do, what the bible says- you interpret and embrace
Actually, what I asked that poster was "Massively generalised bollocks. Any evidence whatsoever to back up this cockamamie contention that "the people of Israel" are prepared to do a countrywide re-enactment of Masada?rachamim18 said:Panda: "The people of Israel are ready to recreate Masada..."
Showing your ignorance again, I see.Well, certainly not all. I know your Peacenik idols would run like the blubbering fools...
You'd sacrifice your children, you'd deny them any choice in the matter?they are but many of us ARE completely willing to die for our beliefs. I would gladly sacrifce myself and all my children for the sake of my people.
ViolentPanda said:No, in the end it stands or falls by how much force is brought against it.
Massively generalised bollocks. Any evidence whatsoever to back up this cockamamie contention that "the people of Israel" are prepared to do a countrywide re-enactment of Masada?
Well maybe if you read what I wrote about consicription in Israel and how it relates to my point you'd think twice before making a fool out of yourself.
Thought not.
Are you retarded? This is an internet forum, I can not answer you while you are composing your reply.
ViolentPanda said:You'd sacrifice your children, you'd deny them any choice in the matter?
If that's so then you're scum of such worthlessness that even hyenas wouldn't piss on your corpse.
As for "soldiers not being prepared to die," that statement is rubbish.
http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=619The "selective refusal" movement is not new. Since the start of the uprising 16 months ago, more than 1,000 Israeli soldiers, including those who signed the recent letter, have refused to serve in the occupied territories. None has been tried, but 50 have been jailed for insubordination. Israel is small -- its 1,000 refusers would be the equivalent of 40,000 politically motivated refusals in the U.S. armed forces. This represents a ratio of discontent that any government, Israeli or American, disregards at its peril.
Gumby said:My point exactly... a boycott is not an adequate form of force.
Massively generalised bollocks. Any evidence whatsoever to back up this cockamamie contention that "the people of Israel" are prepared to do a countrywide re-enactment of Masada?
Well maybe if you read what I wrote about consicription in Israel and how it relates to my point you'd think twice before making a fool out of yourself.
Are you retarded? This is an internet forum, I can not answer you while you are composing your reply.
I'm not "retarded", it's purely that any rational person would know that you could not provide any evidence to answer the question I asked, so I was able to predict what your reply (if you chose to make one) would be. You wouldn't (and couldn't) have an answer.Gumby said:Are you retarded? This is an internet forum, I can not answer you while you are composing your reply.
What I find utterly offensive (and hypocritical) in Rachimim's vile declaration is that it has the stink of the same kind of irrational zealotry that he attributes to and roundly condemns in the Palestinians.[/QUOTE]ZAMB said:I was going to comment on this, but Panda got there before me. Would you deny your children the right to make up their own minds whether a cause was worth dying for? What if they disagreed with you? Would you turn them in as traitors?
Distortion of the facts is something Rachamim has been condemned for many times before.Just one instance [below] of your above statement being at the least, a distortion of the facts. I have seen a number of statements from Israeli soldiers online saying that while they would give their lives to defend their country, they would not risk their lives in the commission of what they call war crimes. Some have gone to jail rather than obey such orders.
http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=619