scifisam
deleted
it's also worth pointing out that inflation is currently running at 3.3% (yeah right) and this represents a 2.7% increase so the correct headline would have been 'Boris to cut London minimum wage'
It gets better and better.
it's also worth pointing out that inflation is currently running at 3.3% (yeah right) and this represents a 2.7% increase so the correct headline would have been 'Boris to cut London minimum wage'
Quite!So hold on, let me get this right. Boris as carried on a policy set by Ken that affects only the very very poorly paid people at the GLA and TFL (can that really be thousands of people?). I'm glad it's been set but this looks like massive spin.
Very good point.it's also worth pointing out that inflation is currently running at 3.3% (yeah right) and this represents a 2.7% increase so the correct headline would have been 'Boris to cut London minimum wage'

Very good point.
So, when the Guardian become a Boris fan, then?![]()
I stopped reading Private Eye recently because it was so pro-Boris (though it might changed again since then).
Does this really apply to "tens of thousands of Londoners"???
How many people does the GLA, LDA and TFL employ??
It's not pro Boris anymore (I can't remember it being all that pro anyway).
He is one of their favorate targets.
Indeed.
Some kudos needs to go the trade unions (yes, I know I would say that), who negotiated this.
Ok, good. The first decent thing he's done. Maybe he's learning.