Boris Bashed - what a Belter

[nino_savatte]

Thick twat.

 

[butchersapron]

So no comment, butchers? That isn't like you.

No comment on you preference? Not really, but good for you!

 

[nino_savatte]

Weak.

 

[nino_savatte]

Now if someone had have smacked him across the head with a cricket bat, I'd have been more impressed.

You're not doing very well here, butchers. You have still managed to avoid this. I wonder why?

 

[butchersapron]

Look above your post #213. I said 'good for you!'

 

[JHE]

Boris waxes indignant in the Telegraph today. He's not writing about rude anarchists lurking pissed to jostle and shout at him. No, he's enraged by bike thieves. He's quite right too. The trouble is he has no solution.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/...GAVCBQWIV0?xml=/opinion/2007/08/02/do0201.xml

 

[The Black Hand]

The agenda you suggest is to change from a non-violent, organised, anarchist position to a violent, unruly non-anarchist position, with you believing this is a 'valid' response to economic and political oppression.

Defeated victims, as you call us, in the past organised cooperatives, unions, and counter-communities to support each other.

Your incitement and approval of a physical, violent 'bash the rich' is not compatible with anarchist history of organising. The accusation made earlier remains: The "fightback" that you advocate has in fact little in common with anarchist history - your examples being more akin to a philosophy of pre-emptive strike, or of a physical response to economic oppression - yours is the response of a vicarious, violent fantasist fetishist -- not an anarchist response.

I am glad you are becoming a specialist in working class fightback, even if you're limiting it to its openly anarchist sort. But you're also rather selective in your presentation about anarchist history. Certainly Bakunin, The Black Hand gang, the FAI, and others recognised that defeated victims are a recipe for permanent defeat. Also I think the Luddites would disagree with you too, and they are very much 'my people', were they yours too?

At some point you have to go on the front foot, otherwise you will be picked off from your static position. Also, there are many things I suggest at this time, and this is only one possibility, to pretend I am limiting the scope of action to this alone is misrepresenting out position.

Finally, anarchism belongs to all who live the principles of freedom, whether so called peaceful or if their resistance and attacks include some fighting.

 

[Taxamo Welf]

I'm confused, first you try to chat me up now you reject me! I'm not sure i can take much more of this.

Anyway, any one else got any stories of putting MPS on the spot?

mmm...

I once got invited to a friend of a friends parents christmas party - a great honour, Will Self had once attended!! Was on the back of my palestine emails i think, someone thought i was a grauniad journo to be. Someone attempted to shake my hand, i recognised them as a certain cabinet member, blanked them, left.

Not exactly boris bashing.

 

[Taxamo Welf]

Boris waxes indignant in the Telegraph today. He's not writing about rude anarchists lurking pissed to jostle and shout at him. No, he's enraged by bike thieves. He's quite right too. The trouble is he has no solution.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/...GAVCBQWIV0?xml=/opinion/2007/08/02/do0201.xml

a decent lock surely?

And the kind of city where people do not intervene with bike thefts is exactly the kind of mentality his politics has always been about.

 

[JHE]

He had a very good lock, apparently. He goes into all that in the article.

 

[Taxamo Welf]

Well then the thief was a professional and specialisation and individualism should be applauded by Johnson

Truly a man moving with the market.

 

[Tankus]

Boris gets my vote ...anyways

 

[kalidarkone]

Which one is Ian Bone?

 

[The Black Hand]

Ian Bone was a butlers son - hardly likely to go to public school let alone Eton old chap.