Liberalism has been the guiding had of human prosperity for hundreds of years, if not a millenia. The gibber buffoonary of socialistic bloodlusters does not discount it.
This doesn't make any sense. Here's a tip: abstain from drinking before launching yourself at the keyboard.I was awake when Afghanistan and Iraq tore themselves apart through sectarianism, after which the free western world had to go in and clean up the mess. And you're a fascistist.
fascistist
PMSL. Numptyism has been around much longer.Liberalism has been the guiding had of human prosperity for hundreds of years, if not a millenia
utterly fucked, you meanMy claims that liberalism, as stewarded by Tony Blair, has brought more peace and prosperty than sovietist socialism ever did is substantiated by, y'know, the state of the world as it exists.
Just your run of the mill British Labour leader. Nothing different about Blair to Attlee
Only if you've no knowledge of history or politics.
A Hyperion to a satyr.
Only if you've no knowledge of history or politics.
How are things in Aubane?Yes Attlee has more blood on his hands. But all Brit politicians do including beloved Corbyn.
What are you referring to here? The partition of India? The end of Palestine?Yes Attlee has more blood on his hands. But all Brit politicians do including beloved Corbyn.
Yes Attlee has more blood on his hands. But all Brit politicians do including beloved Corbyn.
Tony Blair brought the Labour Party back from the hinterlands (a place Commisar Jeremy Corbyn apparently feels a fondness for). He brought the LP from the fringes of far-left lunacy and into the workable centre, and because of him we had 10 years of peace and prosperity. He's a genuine hero to anyone who values concrete political change - a virtue slowly being lost in our loony left/right times


littlebabyjesus said:Got to be a troll. We appear awash with them atm.
Given the way the world is going, perhaps a liberal troll under the bridge in order to stop the march of blood soaked socialism is needed.


What are you referring to here? The partition of India? The end of Palestine?
They're not really comparable - Attlee inherited an empire and 'do nothing' wasn't an option. 'don't start any wars' was very clearly an option for Blair.
Yes, and?Malaya for one.