Good God, you don't even read your own posts anymore, do you?VforVictory said:Instead of arguing about its possibility, why don't we work out where we are going to be and what we are going to do?
What the OP is suggesting isn't struggle, it's more "political activism" divorced from every day life.Attica said:Your logic is all negative, i've put all the negative thoughts above in italics.
If you start wrong, you end wrongThe point is that we could encourage a new cycle of struggle, through solidarity, through linking struggles, and encouraging unity through this idea which could unite people in practice across ideological lines, across party lines, by building on the popular antipathy to Blair. Now, when it comes to crunch, new possibilities may arise which are simply unpredictable. You want to opt out of even trying, you go do that, but don't sabotage struggles by spreading your angst. The point is to try and spread struggles with potential most effectively, and in the absence of alternatives, it is the best we have got...

In Bloom said:What the OP is suggesting isn't struggle, it's more "political activism" divorced from every day life.
In Bloom said:Good God, you don't even read your own posts anymore, do you?
What's the point of doing something that absolutely will not work? Besides making yourself feel important, that is.
There was a Faction of the Ex-WRP who had similar ideas to to yours, led by a character called Bob Myers: Almost fucked up the Liverpool Dockers Strike?Attica said:Your logic is all negative, i've put all the negative thoughts above in italics.
If you start wrong, you end wrongThe point is that we could encourage a new cycle of struggle, through solidarity, through linking struggles, and encouraging unity through this idea which could unite people in practice across ideological lines, across party lines, by building on the popular antipathy to Blair. Now, when it comes to crunch, new possibilities may arise which are simply unpredictable. You want to opt out of even trying, you go do that, but don't sabotage struggles by spreading your angst. The point is to try and spread struggles with potential most effectively, and in the absence of alternatives, it is the best we have got...

He's got nothing to do with me...Nigel said:There was a Faction of the Ex-WRP who had similar ideas to to yours, led by a character called Bob Myers: Almost fucked up the Liverpool Dockers Strike?
Perhaps you could join them Attica?????![]()
![]()
![]()
Leaving aside the fact that this isn't "class struggle action" by any reasonable definition (it is not organised along class lines), unless you have a clear idea of what Blair should be replaced with and why, it is meaningless. What's the point of getting rid of Blair and ending up with Brown?Attica said:That's your opinion, I disagree. As if you can divorce class struggle action against Blair from daily life (you fool, you're negative/wrong again). In case you hadn't noticed Blair has been prime minister for too long and most people want him out...
So wasting time and energy on something pointless is better than conserving your resources for something useful?Attica said:You are chasing the holy grail!! There is NO class struggle activity that will get us to the promised land, have you got any suggestions? NO. Well that means this idea is infantecimally (hope i spelled it right) better than what you are offering... I note you are still spreading your angst, sabotaging struggles better than the special branch!! Cos with fools like you 'in the ranks' spreading DEFEAT in advance they don't need to!
So your solution is what? More spectacle?VforVictory said:We live, lamentably, in a society of the spectacle that degenerates further and further each day.
In Bloom said:So your solution is what? More spectacle?
"Those who speak of revolution without explicitly referring to everyday life, without understanding the subversive content of love and the positive content in the refusal of constraints, such people have a corpse in their mouths." - Raoul Vaneigem
It is indeed, and you appear to have missed the most important part, truly revolutionary action takes place where we live, within our own lives.VforVictory said:Lovely Vaneigem quotation!
It is spectacle though. Activism is so caught up in the spectacle of the action, the molotov thrown at the police, the big events, that the most important area of action, that which aims to improve our own lives, is overlooked.No. Enough spectacle. Time for anti-spectacle.
I'm not actually in Belgium, it's a quote from a comic.What will you be creating from Belgium? We look forward to it.
In Bloom said:So your solution is what? More spectacle?
In Bloom said:I'm not actually in Belgium, it's a quote from a comic.
Again, that's just more spectacle. People will either think it's a funny prank or the action of a few numpties. Either way, it acts within the framework of the spectacle.VforVictory said:We could do with anti-spectacles such as helium in newsrooms. This 24 hour 'news' (the relaying of 'war on terror' propaganda) could do with some spicing up.
In Bloom said:So wasting time and energy on something pointless is better than conserving your resources for something useful?
I would rather continue what I'm doing now, which is trying to get my workplace unionised and working on a few campaigns locally that I think could be useful.

What's so conservative about working class self organisation?Attica said:So you are a social democrat ie conservative.
You keep coming out with this crap. You never actually adress the arguments, just make a lot of pointless accusations. Kindly put up or shut up.You think its pointless, we do not. You're starting to look like a spoiler now, still spreading your angst after it has been pointed out to you. No serious class warrior/working class activist writes struggle off like this. Marx even agreed, which I pointed out on another thread to some other fool.... I'll do it to you if you don't come up with better arguments, or better still shut the fuck up.![]()
![]()
In Bloom said:What's so conservative about working class self organisation?
You keep coming out with this crap. You never actually adress the arguments, just make a lot of pointless accusations. Kindly put up or shut up.

In Bloom said:And I couldn't give a fuck if Marx agreed with me or not, you dogmatic arsehole, Marx had some good ideas, he wasn't a prophet and he didn't descend down from a high mountain with Capital carved on stone tablets.
By organising along class lines, by campaigning against the incursion of capital into our lives, we step outside of the status quo. Your stuntism merely acts within the status quo as part of so-called "legitimate protest".Attica said:Well you do not step outside of the status quo, so you're conservative - that much is self evident...
No I'm not and no I won't. Are you really this incapable of defending the action you are supposed to be arguing in favour of?As for being told you are a spoiler, that is exactly what you are attempting to do. SO you shut up.![]()
![]()
In Bloom said:By organising along class lines, by campaigning against the incursion of capital into our lives, we step outside of the status quo. Your stuntism merely acts within the status quo as part of so-called "legitimate protest".
Your inability to distinguish form and content is worrying from a self-described "Anarcho-Marxist".
No I'm not and no I won't. Are you really this incapable of defending the action you are supposed to be arguing in favour of?

That much is true...Silly me, I was under the impression that organising within our workplaces in order to struggle for our interests against those of the bosses was the very definition of organising along class lines.Attica said:You are not organising along class lines.
What, me bovvered?I know more about anarchism and Marxism than you![]()
![]()
That much is true...
In Bloom said:Silly me, I was under the impression that organising within our workplaces in order to struggle for our interests against those of the bosses was the very definition of organising along class lines.
What, me bovvered?
That you can't deny...In Bloom said:What, me bovvered?
You can't act outside of capitalism, it is everywhere in our society, you can only challenge capitalism by acting against the assumptions on which it is built.Attica said:You are organising within the status quo and not challenging it. That's conservatismThat you can't deny...