I don't and never have lived in Manchester so I wouldn't know. If you asked people in Aston if Aston was part of Birmingham I reckon you'd get 100% yes. If you asked people in West Brom the same, you'd get noes. It's hardly a surprise that when abroad people say their nearest major city, when I lived with my parents I said I came from London despite being 30 miles away, doesn't mean I grew up in London or ever thought I actually lived there, just quickly sick of the conversations that go "where is that?", "it's near London"...
If what I said (which is that West Brom is a substantially different place to Aston), is what you said (which is that they are not really that different), and that also all the other Black Country towns and cities that are part of the west midlands conurbation are part of Birmingham, why didn't you include Wolves and Walsall in your original post? They belong there just as much as West Brom do by your logic.
Totally agreed. WTF are trying to argue about?
OP asked about a Birmingham merger. I say most London clubs are not actually London, but part of a much larger conurbation known as Greater London. I say the West Midlands conurbation is known to most as Birmingham and surrounding towns sort of thing.
I didn't include Wolves and Walsall in my first post because it wasn't necessary.
Anyway you fucking pedant; Villa are the 5th most successful club in English football history behind Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea. We are there without any fuck-off external investing from big twats. Fuck any merger.

