ATOMIC SUPLEX
Member Since: 1985 Post Count: 3
Are there any examples of cities in the UK that have put in cycle lanes that work really well?
ATOMIC SUPLEX said:Like canals. Sometimes you have to dismount and go accross the road. Stations can be junctions or something.
I've been sucked under restaurant tables, and I don't even cycle!chymaera said:The danger, being close to a train, when it is doing 100mph plus is not a plan, a cyclist stands a risk of being sucked under the train.

Urbanblues said:I've been sucked under restaurant tables, and I don't even cycle!![]()
It was!!chymaera said:The price they charge in some restaurants that ought to be part of the service.
beeboo said:I can't really see how it would work in practice if cyclists were routed away from the railway at every station. Stations are generally in busy central areas so you might be forced back onto the road at the very worst places.
Canals have the benefit of not really being used much any more so the towpaths make practical cycling routes.
nino_savatte said:Ah, but cess paths and tracks for works vans are never located flush to the tracks. There's always a considerable gap between them and the ballast.
but while it was in a suburban area the incident actually took place on the main line side of the railway.pogofish said:One of the conditions for the reinstatement of a closed rail line here was that a footpath/cycle track be laid alongside the new rails & that it be linked into an established cycle route. This was not a fast mainline tho.
However, that is going to be little use for anything other than leisure cycling for a very long time yet. It will be several (maybe many) more years before this cycle route is connected to one that has any commuting value.
Another scheme here may see a cycle route run across the city centre using current & former rail lines but again, this is a double edged "benifit" as once completed, First/Stagecoach want all cycle traffic to be confined to it, whilst they get the monopoly on the streets above.
baffled said:Didn't stop one getting hit, twice no less, Tuesday night on the WCMLbut while it was in a suburban area the incident actually took place on the main line side of the railway.
A lot of the Surban routes I use more or less dissect back gardens and also use viaducts and bridges, that alone would make cycle paths a non starter.
ATOMIC SUPLEX said:Why is this not possible? A bit like the paths that follow canals (which a lot of train lines used to be).
They could be a bit like express bike routes. There must be a good reason why this has not been done.
nino_savatte said:What was hit? A van or a pedestrian/cyclist?