)
HackneyE9 said:Dunno if I'll be able to describe what I mean here, but when you look at a 125, compared with say a TGV or ICE train, the panelling always looks really battered and bumpy. Is that just 'cos they're old? Despite all the resprays...
HackneyE9 said:Dunno if I'll be able to describe what I mean here, but when you look at a 125, compared with say a TGV or ICE train, the panelling always looks really battered and bumpy. Is that just 'cos they're old? Despite all the resprays...
teuchter said:I seem to remember reading somewhere that the reason you don't see this on more modern trains like the Pendolino is to do with the way the shell is constructed ... older trains have panels fixed onto a framework whereas some newer ones are made using extruded aluminum panels which have some degree of structural integrity themselves.
Something like that, anyway.
gaijingirl said:Trans-Siberian express.. one week of pure relaxation and beautiful scenery!

Roadkill said:@T & P
Perhaps more to the point, when the Spanish or the French decide on a new high-speed line they are able just to get on and build it. Here in car-obsessed, high-project-costs Britain we can barely get our arses in gear to build a line from Dover to London, never mind London to Scotland!
Roadkill said:Dunno. It might be the material they're constructed out of. Old the 125s might be, but they still a superb piece of design - one of British Rail's best ideas.
Plus, they're much nicer to travel on than their supposed successors, the Virgin Voyagers or FGW 'Adelantes.' They're quieter, they ride more smoothly and there's more space.
![]()
Gratuitous 125 pic, in the BR livery I remember them in as a kid. Back then I used to be frightened of them because of the scream from the turbochargers, but my dad's enthusiasm for them has rubbed off on me somehwere along the line since!
Roadkill said:Having been to see it departing Victoria with the VSOE special last Saturday, I'm going to add Clan Line:
![]()
![]()
(Above photos taken by my own fair hand, an' all)
![]()
It's a 'Merchant Navy' class pacific, in its rebuilt form. Forty years ago this summer, these hauled the last steam-hauled expresses in Britain on the Waterloo-Weymouth route. They went out in style, with trains packed with photographers and enthusiasts, and many an engine crew presented with a collection from the passengers after hitting the 100mph mark ... despite the 90mph speed limit.
A bloke from the preservation group I got chatting to on the platform tells me that Clan Line is reckoned to be the smartest steam locomotive on the main line. How true that is I've no idea, but it really was beautifully turned out. You could see your face in the paint, and all the brasswork was polished to perfection.
A few minutes before departure, I asked the driver how much of a bribe he'd take for a footplate ride. For a moment, I think he thought I was serious, 'cos he looked horrified. Then he grinned and said sadly, 'more than my job's worth mate.'
The only downside of seeing it at Victoria was that they had a diesel pushing on the back so we didn't get to see the steam engine really doing its stuff.
teuchter said:As far as I'm aware the HST is going to be around for at least another 10 years or so, and there is currently talk of what "HST 2" should be. I just hope it will be of comparable quality to the original and that it will rapidly displace all those awful Virgin Voyagers.
Roadkill said:Can't stand the Voyagers personally, but the basic design does pretty good service on Midland Mainline and Hull Trains. Virgin have squeezed too many seats into too small a space: the ones on Hull Trains are more spacious and they're quite pleasant to ride in, although they're not as quiet or comfy as an HST.
Roadkill said:I'll see your Growler and raise you a Class 50.![]()
Faster than a Class 37, and an impressive looking beast as well.
Yeah that's true... it's still unbelievable that despite all the money thrown at the London-Glasgow route for the last decade or two it is still a paltry 125mph line. I don't know how much it actually cost to build the new Madrid Barcelona high speed line but I suspect it's less than the money thrown into the London-Glasgow route.Roadkill said:@T & P
Perhaps more to the point, when the Spanish or the French decide on a new high-speed line they are able just to get on and build it. Here in car-obsessed, high-project-costs Britain we can barely get our arses in gear to build a line from Dover to London, never mind London to Scotland!
T & P said:Yeah that's true... it's still unbelievable that despite all the money thrown at the London-Glasgow route for the last decade or two it is still a paltry 125mph line. I don't know how much it actually cost to build the new Madrid Barcelona high speed line but I suspect it's less than the money thrown into the London-Glasgow route.
T & P said:Yeah that's true... it's still unbelievable that despite all the money thrown at the London-Glasgow route for the last decade or two it is still a paltry 125mph line. I don't know how much it actually cost to build the new Madrid Barcelona high speed line but I suspect it's less than the money thrown into the London-Glasgow route.
cybertect said:I seem to remember, in the 1980s, every once in a while the departure boards at London Victoria would show Vladivostok as a destination with stops along the way in Berlin, Warsaw and Moscow.
I'm still in love with the idea of getting a train to the other end of Asia from one of my regular London commute points![]()
guinnessdrinker said:I suspect it would be a bit more difficult to build a new line between london and glasgow than madrid and barcelona. england is not exactly empty.
Hear, hear, the tables in First Class are way too small and the toilets always stink.Roadkill said:Tbh I think they're a load of shit. [Virgin Voyager] Badly designed, too small, uncomfortable, noisy and slow. Bring back the 125s!
Cobbles said:Hear, hear, the tables in First Class are way too small and the toilets always stink.
Tom A said:Strange that no-one has yet mentioned the definitive British Rail locomotive...
![]()
Goes anywhere, does anything, at any time. Outlasted pretty much all the other British loco designs, and kickes the ass out of the EWS 66 and 67 "Skips". A fine piece of machinery indeed, and still going strong today (albeit mostly with new engines and motors inside).
Roadkill said:Pity those of us who can only afford Cattle Class then! I'm not all that tall or broad, but the seats are pitifully small and there's no leg room, and nowhere to put a bag either. Oh, and the shop is an overpriced gimmick.
Last time I went long-distance on a Voyager, one toilet was blocked and stinking out the entire coach, and on the next one along the door evidently didn't work properly. I went for a piss, pressed the button and then noticed the 'engaged' sign next to it. Never mind: it swung open anyway, to reveal a middle-aged bloke in a suit wiping his arse.
Truly, I'd rather travel behind a loco and a rake of carriages, as we used to back in the 80s. I've happy memories of a few York-West Country runs on old-fashioned trains like that. They were a fair bit slower, but a whole lot more comfy, and because they were loco-hauled it was easy to add a couple of extra carriages at busy times.
Chris Gibb, Virgin Cross-Country boss, claims in an interview in the current issue of RAIL magazine, that the Voyagers are hugely popular and a main reason why there are more people using Cross-Country services. There's only one word for that IMO: Bollocks! Virtually no-one I've spoken to likes them, including a few Virgin train crew.
