Thora
Differently Ethical
I thought he meant victimisationAnnaKarpik said:What does this mean? I even looked up vindication. Then I read the thread (mostly). Everyone understands it except me![]()

I thought he meant victimisationAnnaKarpik said:What does this mean? I even looked up vindication. Then I read the thread (mostly). Everyone understands it except me![]()


butchersapron said:He means villification.
untethered said:It depends what you mean by "capitalism".
If you mean they're opposed to a global free market, they are.
butchersapron said:As noted above, there's a not missing there. It should read
"I didn't say solely, but the areas in which they're winning seats are the areas of 'marginalised' white w/c people that the idiots behind this white season imagine."
..and the 'winning seats' is key in that sentence.
mk12 said:So why do the IWCA, for example, aim to counter the BNP by doing community work in areas made up of the "marginalised white w/c"? If that's not where the BNP are gaining influence?
"The rest of the left see the white working class as the BNP’s constituency. I think the left drive working-class people into the arms of the fascists, whereas we’re there to coax people the other way.’"
Should the IWCA not worry about this happening, if the "white w/c" isn't voting BNP anyway?
mk12 said:But why would the BNP try and gain influence in white w/c areas, if they were succeeding in middle class areas?
Is there evidence that this is the case anywhere? Aren't Respect usually criticsed for not campaiging in working class areas where the BNP aim to gain a foothold?
mk12 said:Interesting stuff, thanks for the links.
Can you expand on this though, I didn't understand it: "immigration and asylum have become symbols for failures in other policy areas, such as education and housing."
Yes, it appears to mean that the lack of housing and decent funded education is being turned into racial issues via the immigration debate rather than being addressed as the social/class/political issues that they really are by interested parties - politicians etc. The pressure on the education system and affordable housing is coming from immigrants, not from our own incompetence, disinterest or deliberate policies.
mk12 said:I remember hearing on the radio that there is a major study going on at the moment which is looking into claims that immigrants are 'jumping the queue' on housing lists. I'm not sure who it's being done by though.
butchersapron said:Yes, it appears to mean that the lack of housing and decent funded education is being turned into racial issues via the immigration debate rather than being addressed as the social/class/political issues that they really are by interested parties - politicians etc. The pressure on the education system and affordable housing is coming from immigrants, not from our own incompetence, disinterest or deliberate policies.

nino_savatte said:I've been saying that all along and you've just woken up to the fact? Of course, you offer no solutions but would demand that I produce them on demand if I made the same comments.
You've no sense of irony.![]()
butchersapron said:Everyone's been saying that you prat, fuck me do you think you're Moses bringing the tablets down from the mountain.

. So bascially, you agree with me and others but have been calling them racists for a year or so. Nice one.
butchersapron said:Nino, tell you what - go do your weird stalking obsessiveness with someone else and on a different thread. Preferably one that you've already ruined - there's a whole heap of them for you to choose from. I'm not interested right now, so off you toodle...


butchersapron said:He means villification.
The BBC Camden latte bar perspective cannot & will not defeat racism/fascism. End of.