Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Audiophile albums

ime a technically good production will work on any given system.the 'trashier' productions requie a better set of speakers.
 
tbh for something as densly produced as b metal to sound good on laptop speakers it would have to be recorded pretty well.
 
Here we are:
Whatever you now find weird, ugly, uncomfortable and nasty about a new medium will surely become its signature. CD distortion, the jitteriness of digital video, the crap sound of 8-bit - all of these will be cherished and emulated as soon as they can be avoided. It’s the sound of failure: so much modern art is the sound of things going out of control, of a medium pushing to its limits and breaking apart. The distorted guitar sound is the sound of something too loud for the medium supposed to carry it. The blues singer with the cracked voice is the sound of an emotional cry too powerful for the throat that releases it. The excitement of grainy film, of bleached-out black and white, is the excitement of witnessing events too momentous for the medium assigned to record them
 
I enjoy high fidelity recordings played on the finest systems too. But listening to music in different ways does give you other - sometimes quite different - perspectives on the music. What's that thing Eno says about today's distortion being the desirable aesthetic of the future?
Yeah, I bought a plug-in that is based on all the bad artefacts of vhs recording. I love it :o
 
Any idiot can record a wall of distorted noise, and any old heap of shit speaker can reproduce it.

It takes a lot more skill - and a better speaker system - to capture a sense of depth and space, as well as the individual elements within it, or to have a full wall of sound type effect where everything is still clear and working harmoniously together.
I follow but not all walls of distorted noise are equal - far from it. Anyhow, distorted noise isnt the alternative bench mark - creative engineering is.
When i think of the great produced records things that spring to min are MBV Loveless, certain Black Ark Lee Perry, Spector's Wall of Sound...not 80s Phil Collins productions, no matter how clear and harmonious they might be.

im not against clarity of course - i think grace jones was rightly mentioned - sly and robbie's 80s stuff tends to all have that sound - which includes Black Uhuru's Dub Factor, which would be a strong audiophile nomination from me.

Maybe this association is another reason why audiophile perfection is such a nonsense...its leads you to really appreciating mediocre music
 
Just that it's a terrible album loved by people with very expensive stereos, or middle aged ex-stoners. I know lots of people feel the same way about Aja too, but they're wrong there because I like it.
how about this lol?
 
Just that it's a terrible album loved by people with very expensive stereos, or middle aged ex-stoners. I know lots of people feel the same way about Aja too, but they're wrong there because I like it.
I wasn’t vouching for the quality of the music, just that it would make an audiophile orgasm. They’re music is not terrible IMO, but so beige as to be almost unlistenable these days
 
Just that it's a terrible album loved by people with very expensive stereos, or middle aged ex-stoners. I know lots of people feel the same way about Aja too, but they're wrong there because I like it.
When I was young I used to try and drum along with Aja, which provided a swift and lifelong lesson in knowing my limitations.
 
When I was young I used to try and drum along with Aja, which provided a swift and lifelong lesson in knowing my limitations.
Yes, but you are up against Steve Gadd, Bernard Purdie, and Rick Marotta, amongst the plethora of drummers and other top of their game session musicians that Fagen and Becker utililised often a totally different line-up for each track. Perfectionist bleeders.
I’ve still not mastered most of the guitar parts after all these years, so we can come to the same conclusion about our abilities.
 
There’s


If you’ve got kit to render MQA then Tidal Masters is well worth it.

There’s some amazing stuff on there - John Coltrane, Aretha Franklin and Philip Glass if you’re into that. Roberta Flack - Killing Me Softly well worth a listen.

For anyone confused but interested in MQA and how to get it.....

It's a Hi Res file format that is compared to the masters that are produced in the studio. Whereas even CD quality still has some form of compression. MQA is designed to sound as near to the studio masters as possible. The MQA files are authorised from the artists and studio producers themselves.

To get them you need a Tidal Hifi subsription (the top tier available) and you need something that can feed the full file format throught to your hifi (a decent stereo amp is recommended. If you are playing music through an Alexa type speaker you're wasting your money)

To play full MQA you can purchase something expensive such as this NODE 2i

NODE 2i

Or more cheaply you can also stream from your phone but your phone must have Hi Res audio support and you need to purchase a USB app (USB audio pro and then an in app MQA support codec - Costs less that £10 all in) from the play store. I've gone this route and have bought the the IFI zen DAC for £129. This fully converts MQA into my analogue amp.

Much easier though is to download the tidal app onto your laptop or PC and stream via USB into your amp or DAC. The desktop app itself will convert the MQA file for you.

You can trial Tidal Hifi £4 for four months..

.

If you love your music like I do and crave really decent sound quality. I fully recommend it!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom