Callie said:no really, i dont know what you mean by that comment!
and yes I have missed you, theres no one else id rather blather with about things i know nothing about![]()

*waggles hand* nah, I think you have to pass pros and cons around the whole operation, for efficiency. The more you split a project up, the fewer opportunities you have to move spare resources around (money, time, skills, labour). eg. It woulud be silly to split up the wine, beer, cider and spirits bars, because they will have different profit margins and replicated tasks - far better to join them together as a single project and average things out. It also makes sense to consider the festival as a whole operation, able to distribute its excesses to meet its deficiencies.butchersapron said:And to be clear that was a ref to alcohol, not the festival as a whole.
butchersapron said:And to be clear that was a ref to alcohol, not the festuival as a whole.
Crispy said:*waggles hand* nah, I think you have to pass pros and cons around the whole operation, for efficiency. The more you split a project up, the fewer opportunities you have to move spare resources around (money, time, skills, labour). eg. It woulud be silly to split up the wine, beer, cider and spirits bars, because they will have different profit margins and replicated tasks - far better to join them together as a single project and average things out. It also makes sense to consider the festival as a whole operation, able to distribute its excesses to meet its deficiencies.
It's getting late, I've turned this post into some rant about division of labour. I need another glass of wine and some kittens.
Callie said:i would have thought that them stopping byob and just having tents selling at extortionate prices was more about profit than limiting the amount people drink![]()
butchersapron said:They couldn't bootleg their own festival Giles.
Isambard said:I run bars at a few not for profit events and involved (albeit on the fringes) of working at 2 community festivals locally. Running your own bar with 3 cans for a fiver from a bucket of ice sounds cool but it is unlikely to work.
I won't say theft per se, just "shrinkage" of the take and the stock.
I remember turning in my takings the first time I ran a remote bar like that and the organisers were amazed at the money. Cos I didn't give all my mates free drinks, guzzle them all myself or skim the till.
If you rent out stalls to publicans and brewery companies you get hard cash and it is up to them to make the money.
The stall holders moan the rent is too high and people bring their own drinks.
Festival goers moan the drinks are too dear at the stalls and swear to only ever bring their own. There is a happy medium to be found in theory.
I'm just back from a trip to Czech/Slovakia and I saw posters for festivals sponsored by Orange. So we can guess what to expect there in a few years time.
Isambard said:I've handled the cash at drinks-ticket events before as well and you are right it is a good system. I dunno if it work for the size of these festivals though.


Callie said:queue to get drink ticket, queue to get drink, drink drink, queue to get drink ticket etc etc![]()
