I hope Bristol people can keep us up to date with any news/developments in the New Year, because debts that big are going to be pretty damned tough to clear. Fair chance the whole thing will go completely tits up at least for a year or two.
ETA : Does anyione know anyone with involvement in the Ashton Court setup? Would be grand if they could be persuaded to post here!
But if a new/reconstituted festival eventually re-emerges from the ashes, I think it's inevitable that in its new form it will HAVE to be quite a bit scaled down. And as even the current Committee acknowledge in that statement I posted, it'll have to be returned closer to its community roots.
Strawberry Fair in Cambridge is only a one day fest, but it is well established, large (ca 25,000 on a hot day), community/alternative focussed, less bothered with name headliners and only sponsored by the two beer tents, with some additional help from the Council. Also, being free, fairly lightly Policed. The Committee in Cambridge are experienced, just as some of Ashton Court's people are, frutiful information could be exchanged. Other similar large but community oriented festivals also exist elsewhere.
In Bristol's case, if Bath Ales and maybe one or two other low key, more Bristol/local area rooted sponsors could be persuaded to do a deal to keep a smaller version of the festival still going, then there'd still be possibilities. I doubt people would object too hugely to paying a £5 in if the whole thing became less overtly big-brand corporate. Orange were REALLY pushing it in July and were so fucking in your face with those spacehoppers and tacky gifts and constant name repetition. Whereas a beer tent it just ... there, with a big Bath Ales banner, selling beer ... much less problematic I'd have thought!
The real problem seems to be the licensing and Police/security costs. Can anyone tell me how much Bristol City Council would see it in their own interests to keep the festie going as a more comminity focussed thing? Or are they indifferent to the whole thing going down the tube? Because if they in any way want to keep it going, even at the cost of taking on at least some of the debt, it would then be in
their interests to smooth the edges of the licensing process and listen to proposals from the existing or new Committee to cut back on some of the more expensive and less necessary costs and obstacles.
Am I being unrealistic here?
Another issue is the expensive buses, which were subsidised by Orange. Would unsubsidised buses be even more expensive for fares?