Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Article on Brixton in today's Evening Standard

Here's the article:


Brixton's bold experiment to ignore cannabis smokers and clamp down on hard drugs led to the area becoming a magnet for dealers. Now, two years on, as cannabis is downgraded, what is really happening?

AT 4pm on a Friday afternoon, two black men are standing by the public benches outside the Ritzy Cinema, opposite Kentucky Fried Chicken, in Brixton. One is wearing a leather bomber jacket, the other a hoodie. They look around constantly, ignoring the groups of homebound chattering schoolchildren. One catches my eye. He gestures for me to come over. "Skunk, weed," he mouths. I shake my head and move on.

A few minutes later, the pair are joined by a scruffily-dressed white woman.

There's much laughing and joshing.

Suddenly, the man in the bomber jacket darts across the narrow road, towards the cinema. He has seen someone he knows. Seconds later, he returns with a young white man, dressed in a parka and combat trousers. The four form a huddle.

Then the hoodie wearer takes the white man over to a bench where a large black man is sitting. Amid much hand slapping, it's just possible to see the large black man pass something over to the white man, who shakes his hand firmly. The large black man then puts his hand into his pocket; the white man walks away towards Brixton Hill.

It's over in seconds: another drugs trade, in full view of anyone, in broad daylight, on Brixton's busiest street.

Scenes like this - a while later I count six people lurking under the trees, with some more lounging on the benches, and a steady flow of others coming and going - are what you expect of Brixton. They reinforce the borough's image as the drugs centre of London, a place where drugs are bought and sold on the street and nobody bats an eyelid.
 
In truth, drugs have been dealt in Coldharbour Lane, just down from the Ritzy, for years. What impinged the area on the national consciousness as a drugs soukh was the decision by Brian Paddick, the former police commander for Lambeth, with Brixton at its core, to relax the application of the cannabis laws in the borough.

Mr Paddick's concession, which sparked a national furore that saw his own lifestyle brought into question and his departure from Lambeth (he has since been rehabilitated and his career has continued its upward path), was made two years ago. Today, nationally, possession of cannabis is downgraded as a criminal offence, provoking an almighty row about the dangers of the drug and the conflicting signals the Government is sending out, especially to the young and impressionable.

Two years ago, I went to Brixton to explore the effects of Paddick's Law for the Evening Standard. I found that local people were broadly supportive of the change - provided it achieved what he intended it should: the freeing up of police resources and time to go after serious crime, the supply of hard drugs and, in particular, the crack houses that had sprung up across the borough. Last week, I went back, to see what has happened. At first sight, the answer is, not much. Now, as then, there is still an edginess on the streets and the sense of a district that at any moment could explode in violence and wailing sirens.

There are still drug dealers, and users, in evidence. At a bus stop at the top end of Coldharbour Lane, on the way up to Clapham, two men are smoking a spliff while waiting for a bus. They make no attempt to disguise what they're doing - they can't anyway, because the smell of the powerful skunk is so strong.

BUT Brixton has changed.

Gone from the stairwell and entrance at the Tube station are the crackheads who used to make the lives of commuters hell, hassling them for money, offering them drugs. In their place are two uniformed police officers.

You can walk along Brixton Road and nobody hisses they've got stuff to sell.

Down Coldharbour Lane, two pubs where anything, literally, was available to anyone who wanted it, are shut.

Another thing you notice is that druggies are less obvious. "There are less crazy-eyed people on the streets," said Henry Baird, a long-time Brixton resident. Mr Baird, who lives just off Brixton Hill, between the Fridge and the prison, says he's noticed a significant difference in mood. " Brixton is a lot safer than it used to be."

His observation is supported by the crime figures. Street crime in Lambeth has fallen 42 per cent in the past 18 months. In Brixton centre, the fall is 36 per cent since September last year. In October 2001, there were 916 reported muggings and other street crime in Lambeth, the highest ever figure.

Last December that total was down to 338.

At Lambeth Town Hall, Charles Anglin, a Liberal Democrat councillor and member of the coalition with the Tories that wrested control from Labour, rattles off a stream of statistics. "One and a half years ago, there was a street market in drugs of £12million on the stretch between the station and KFC alone," says Anglin.

"Now it's been transformed."

The impressive Anglin is a new breed of Lambeth councillor, overseeing community safety schemes, determined to make his borough a more desirable place in which to live and work. Before everyone gets carried-away, it's worth remembering that Lambeth still has the highest incidence of street crime in the country. But things are looking up. " Brixton has got better," says Paul Twyman of the Lambeth Police Consultative Committee. "It's true you can be intimidated if you look down some of the side roads and see clusters of figures and kids on bikes toing and froing - you don't have to be a genius to work out what they're doing - but, overall, it's better."

The temptation is to say that it's all down to Mr Paddick, that his initiative did allow his officers to concentrate on what was actually blighting the area: the crack dens and preponderance of street dealers in class A drugs. Their existence drew cocaine and heroin addicts to Lambeth who themselves committed crimes to fuel their habits. Under Mr Paddick, his immediate successor, Brian Moore, and now, Chief Superintendent Richard Quinn, the police, working with Lambeth council and community groups, have cracked down on crack.

In the last eight months alone, said Quinn, 300 addresses across Lambeth have been raided for crack cocaine.

He now has more officers on the street than ever before. Rachel Heywood, chairwoman of the Brixton Area Forum's Crime Working Group, said: "Paddick made an intelligent decision in response to what the majority of people in Brixton saw as the big problem, namely Class As, heroin and crack. Dealing with class As has made people feel safer, plus the cannabis experiment led to new levels of trust between the police and the community. It removed the tension and was a response to what they were lobbying for."

SO, is Mr Paddick to be slapped on the back, his scheme deemed an unqualified success, responsible for turning the tide against crime in the borough? No.

His relaxation of the cannabis laws was deeply flawed. By singling out Lambeth for the experiment and not including other boroughs, it appeared as though this was a problem unique to Lambeth, which it wasn't. Worse still, it had a negative effect, of drawing "drugs tourists" into the area.

For many people in Brixton, cannabis use was never a major issue. Suddenly, it became one and the place was a magnet for dealers and smokers from all over.

"It was very evident that it gave Brixton, and Brixton town centre especially, a clear image of somewhere where people could come and buy drugs - whether cannabis or class A," says Jonathan Toy, head of Lambeth council's Community Safety department. "It was seen as a place that was incredibly open and that kind of perception only added to the problem." Dealers, said Mr Toy, saw Brixton, "as a business opportunity to access other markets, not just cannabis".

Lambeth and Brixton, in particular, were seen across Britain and internationally as the place to get drugs. At Mediterranean airports, recalls Mr Heywood, stickers appeared, exhorting travellers, if they needed drugs while in Britain, to go to Brixton. "The experiment for Lambeth has not made a positive difference to its communities," said Mr Toy, "It's not done anything for the urban debate and it created more baggage for us."

At the police station, Mr Quinn says he can "take aspects of success or failure" from the relaxation. "Is it a success when kids think cannabis is legal and they can smoke it legally?" asks Mr Quinn, because, he claims, that was one of the results it had. There's no doubt, too, that outsiders flocked to Lambeth because they thought cannabis and possibly other drugs were legal, or at least the police wouldn't mind. "Fifty per cent of the people arrested here for drugs use don't live here," says Mr Quinn, "They came because they thought it was an easy touch."

The police and community drive against crack has had a huge impact. It's been joined, too, by a new effort to clean up the borough.

Associating Lambeth with any drugs, cannabis included, is now frowned upon. Even the organiser of the Legalise Cannabis March, a traditional fixture on the Brixton calendar, are no longer guaranteed such a warm welcome.

Places in the borough that became publicly identified with drugs, even soft ones such as cannabis, have been hit - hence the closure of the pubs near Loughborough Junction. But if the attitude has hardened, why do Mr Quinn and his fellow officers tolerate the dealers outside the Ritzy? "They've been corralled into a small area," he says.

Shutting them down and also ending once and for all the trade in Coldharbour Lane, explains Mr Quinn, is not so simple. Drug dealing is well embedded in the locality and, he points out, this is Brixton: racial tension is never far below the surface and the police have to move cautiously. A mass police raid on the dealers in Coldharbour Lane, for example, might spark a full-scale riot. But, stresses Mr Quinn, don't be fooled into thinking something won't be done.

Mr Quinn has a reputation for toughness. Big and burly, he is liked by his fellow officers, and by the community. Last week he was on patrol in Brixton Road when he spotted a man smoking a joint in a telephone booth. Brixton's most senior police officer promptly arrested him and took him to the police station.

Subsequently, the man, who was a foreigner, was deported.

Cannabis may be being downgraded from class B to class C but Mr Quinn is clear: the police won't tolerate people openly smoking or dealing in the drug, not in Lambeth.

The law may be changing but Lambeth is also changing. For the better.
 
Thanks to the two people who pointed that out to me... I was blindly assuming I could cut'n'paste the Standard without problems
 
For the moment its best to avoid any reference to the cafe in that has shut down. Otherwise we will be prejudicing the fairness of a court hearing.

Thank you for respecting this.

:)
 
Thanks for taking the trouble to post up the article Bob.

Whilst its reasonable on one level its anti Paddick on another.Basically its saying that the Paddick experiment was a mistake as it encouraged "Drug Tourism" and kids to smoke a lot."Drug Tourism" was around before Paddick came along.Brixton was well known for drugs when I was first here in the early 80s.Brixton was always a place for drinking and clubbing on weekends(not mentioning particular premises of course)particularly from the mid 80s when Es were around.Therefore Paddick cannot be blamed.

What Paddick did was make official was what coppers on the beat had been doing for ages.Coppers arent totally stupid-if they went and searched everyone in Brixton on the W/E they would not have enough cells to keep them in.As long as people arent being a nuisance they turned a blind eye to a lot of stuff.

The bit in the article about the Cannabis festival being frowned upon is probably a quote from the present Lib/Dem Tory administration.The Councils persecution of the Festival through the courts makes this likely.Also note the comment from Lambeths Community Safety Dept that the Paddick experiment made things worse.

I thought the Lib/Dem line on Cannabis(at Conferance) was legalisation?Any Libs her know?

So the actual Council/Police policy seems to me to be confused.The whole thing about Cannabis culture is that its part of street culture and their are those who grow their own.Im not saying the street culture is good -its a fact of life as long as its illegal.If reclassification means anything it should affect how the police deal with people on the streets.The article showed the example of someone who was deported for smoking a joint-which to me seems draconian-rather than having it consficated.

As longs as drugs are illegal their will be a criminal network supplying drugs.Their is to much money to be made and a ready market.Drug use has being going on throughout human history.As long as it does not harm other people it should be allowed.Legalisation and harm reduction is the only way to solve this problem.

Paddicks "crime" was to be to honest and open about drug use.politicians like Cllr Anglin arent going to commit political suicide by advocating even the mildest of reforms.They arent going to stand up to the "Daily Mail" view of the world.
 
And another point(Ive said before)CHL didnt use to be were drugs were sold on the street.It used to be Railton Road before it was demolished.The first riots started in Railton Rd when the police tried to arrest someone for possession.The demolishing of Railton Rd and the increase in late night bars/clubs in CHL led to the increase in drug selling on CHL.

The space outisde the Tate Library and Ritzy used only to be filled by the (harmless)street drinkers.Its only recently that the dealers have turned up.I have real problems with them outside the library.Their are people with kids going past -u shouldnt have to run the gauntlet of that.

If they just kept to the park it would be OK.But I find it more than irritating to be accosted when Im obviously going into the Ritzy of Library.
 
"The article showed the example of someone who was deported for smoking a joint"

I got the impression that this person was illegal here anyway and would have been deported if stopped by by the police for any reason.

:)
 
hatboy said:
"The article showed the example of someone who was deported for smoking a joint"

I got the impression that this person was illegal here anyway and would have been deported if stopped by by the police for any reason.

:)

I agree but the thing is their are so many people in London with no visas etc that the police use this as a way of punishing people.Actually you may be wrong-if the person had permission to stay in this country, but is not a UK national, violated any laws they could be deported.Im no legal expert but I believe this to be the case.

Their are loads of people in London who are here "illegally" as long as they dont hurt me Im not bothered.
 
Ritzy square

hendo said:
I thought the Standard article was pretty much spot on.

I wonder when they'll sort the front of the Ritzy out? Dick Quinn seems to hint that's on the horizon.

Hello, I'm new to the board but thought I would reply to this one as I saw a notice in Brixton Library today asking for local people to become involved with exactly the above i.e. making the Ritzy square into a local space that people will use and can enjoy. Look on the notice board in the library entrance for further details ... :) 'they'll' sort the front out would become 'we'll' sort it out ...
 
Back
Top Bottom