why did you go back the second time?
Is it his use of terms that belittle and oppress minorities that you’re a huge fan of? Or his flashing at female members of the audience?Had his show cancelled by the Fringe bosses. I’m been a huge fan of his since the 80’s. Pretty disappointing.
Being “famously offensive” is not a free rein to say absolutely anything with no consequences.Famously offensive comedian/magician in offensive material shocker!![]()
Being “famously offensive” is not a free rein to say absolutely anything with no consequences.
Yes, Sadowitz and Rushdie both learnt this on Saturday.Being “famously offensive” is not a free rein to say absolutely anything with no consequences.
What are you saying here? What equivalence exactly are you drawing between a theatre deciding that they don’t want somebody on their stage and a stabbing?Yes, Sadowitz and Rushdie both learnt this on Saturday.
And another is that a commercial enterprise decided they didn’t want to partner with him any more.One consequence was that the pool of people wanting to go see him was fairly limited.
And another is that a commercial enterprise decided they didn’t want to partner with him any more.
It’s not exactly a stabbing in the neck, whatever Tim might think of it.
Not really. I believe he had some comments about Savile in his routine many years ago, but I doubt this resulted in an emergency summit at Broadcasting House.Plus making himself very unpopular with the BBC with some quite outrageous allegations relating to Sir Jimmy Savile
Eh? You think Rushdie was propagating a messsage of hate?He was actually protected by the State at great cost so he could continue propagating his message of hate.
Merely, that they're both the consequences of provoking and upsetting others. I don't suppose anyone will try and kill Sadowitz, although he has been violently attacked because of his act. Rushdie has also been the victim of more petty bannings.What are you saying here? What equivalence exactly are you drawing between a theatre deciding that they don’t want somebody on their stage and a stabbing?
Not really. I believe he had some comments about Savile in his routine many years ago, but I doubt this resulted in an emergency summit at Broadcasting House.

Eh? You think Rushdie was propagating a messsage of hate?
Did you mean to link something else there?And as well as the attacks on a major world religion, let’s not forget his far-right rants:
![]()
Salman Rushdie: We're all too offended now
'Satanic Verses' author attacks rise of religious and political tribalism that makes people define themselves by what they hatewww.independent.co.uk
And as well as the attacks on a major world religion, let’s not forget his far-right rants:
![]()
Salman Rushdie: We're all too offended now
'Satanic Verses' author attacks rise of religious and political tribalism that makes people define themselves by what they hatewww.independent.co.uk
Jeezus fucking christ this is daft 
Well, no, there’s a huge difference, but there’s also a huge difference in the scale of the crime.
Rushdie was allowed to offend many, many millions of people (people who had not bought a ticket to endure such treatment), over the course of decades. He was actually protected by the State at great cost so he could continue propagating his message of hate.
You can say what you like, obviously we need and believe in freedom of expression, but not without any consequences, especially if you are making people feel unsafe.