Actually, given that you think that is how the word is used, care to link to any book on fascism that uses it that way.
bolloxy bolloxy bollox!Sunburn said:Mussolini coined the word Facism to describe his regime's ideology. This ideology was shared by Nazi Germany and some of their puppets. As yet, no other regimes have had all their unique characteristics(and hopefully none ever will). To describe other regimes as Fascist is therefore inaccurate.

Link to books on fascism (in the sense that you mean it) which use the word fascism in the way that I mean it? That seems unlikely.General Ludd said:Actually, given that you think that is how the word is used, care to link to any book on fascism that uses it that way.
In my view he was a classic fascist.Sunburn said:I would suggest that Franco was more of a right wing, authoritarian conservative (He was Catholic, supported the established elites etc) than a Fascist.
None of those are examples of the use of your definition of fascism in a serious book (or indeed in an article in a respected periodical like Past & Present).Just a few examples of how the word is used by (more or less) ordinary people.
pilchardman said:In my view he was a classic fascist.
As I already stated, there is the 'historical' usage of the word and there is the 'common' usage of the word, and the two are clearly quite distinct.General Ludd said:None of those are examples of the use of your definition of fascism in a serious book (or indeed in an article in a respected periodical like Past & Present).
http://www.soc.cornell.edu/faculty/berezin/Fascism.pdfFascism could have remained simply a characteristic of a group of historically specific political formations. But the term rather quickly developed a life of its own.
Today it serves as what Alexander (2003) has described as a “bridging metaphor” that is a term that one uses independently of historical or definitional context when confronted with acts of arbitrary violence or authoritarianism in political and in some instances, social life.
I think the term fascist is best applied to the European dictatorships of the 1930s. Indeed, primarily to two of those: Italy and Spain. Nazi Germany, whilst sharing enough to invite comparison, had enough particularities to warrant its own category.nino_savatte said:In which case, so is Pinochet. But in my mind, though Franco was clearly a militarist, he wasn't fascist and he wasn't even a member of the Falange until 1962 (?) though he shared and promoted their 'vision' long before then.
So you don't believe it would be accurate to describe, say, the BNP or the National Front as fascist?pilchardman said:I think the term fascist is best applied to the European dictatorships of the 1930s. Indeed, primarily to two of those: Italy and Spain. Nazi Germany, whilst sharing enough to invite comparison, had enough particularities to warrant its own category.
"Fascist" as a term ought to be reserved for those states.
No.In Bloom said:So you don't believe it would be accurate to describe, say, the BNP or the National Front as fascist?