Nigel said:So No one in and around the IWCA is prepared to comment on this?![]()
Dug yourselves into a left reformist trap: can't get out?
So much for open democracy!!!!!![]()
Nigel said:Unless Suburban Casual, and his position are IWCA policies I did not call the IWCA Strasserite. What I have said in the past & stick by is that they Have a strong white paternal element to their political make up.![]()
durruti02 said:yep .. apology .. didn't read your strasser jibe clearly enough ..
disagree with rest though .. one of their key activists in oxford is asian and the area they are most active in is pretty mixed ..
Put them in forced labour camps, obviouslyNigel said:What do you do with the five percenters?

Sue said:Nigel, as you're no doubt aware, the Oxford Mail is infamous for its shoddy reporting. The quote printed was not the full or only quote given by IWCA councillors -- just the only one they chose to print. The point about police priorities in targetting those growing/dealing cannabis rather than those dealing crack/heroin and the comparative destructive impact on the community was made but ignored by the Oxford Mail. As said above, the IWCA had nothing to do with the proceedings against the resident.
Re the 'strong white paternal' thing. Two out of the four IWCA councillors in Oxford are female.
Just to add -- I also think you're being disengenuous at best here. You've met many of the Oxford IWCA activists over the years and are perfectly aware that when you come on here to slag them off, what you say is complete cobblers.
Have you read the two links I posted?Nigel said:In the context that I am using Paternal, is not in being male or even white; just going along with a steriotypical, two dimensional Chauvanistic Attitude of what you consider the 'British' Working Class' are perceived to have. Hardly any opposition towards the war in the Middle East, failing to deal with soft racism, especially against Asylum Seekers(What position has IWCA done or said against Campsfield for instance), and completely dropping any talk of Socialist ideas because it would alienate itself from the electorate.
Is the IWCA going to take a position on the Legalisation Of Cannabis.
The best way to deal with anti social crime with soft drugs.
Are they going to oppose ASBO's, Evictions, Custodial Sentences as the best way of dealing with petty criminals, or would this go against the Little Englander, Sun Reading perspective that you perceive the whole 'working class' in 'their' electorial areas have. I would say its putting the cart before the horse but I don't think that your that naive.
As for the accusation that I'm always 'slagging off' the IWCA then you know that this is untrue. I have leafleted Blackbird Leys during an election (something that I would'nt do now), argued and continue to tell people to vote IWCA in Oxford, not because I think that they are some miraculous answer for the struggle of the working class or socialism, but becuase they are the most proggressive group standing their. I also went against the policies of the Socialist Party; a group that I was and am actively involved in over Blackbird Leys Community Centre of which the IWCA's position was correct.
Nigel said:In the context that I am using Paternal, is not in being male or even white; just going along with a steriotypical, two dimensional Chauvanistic Attitude of what you consider the 'British' Working Class' are perceived to have.
Nigel said:Hardly any opposition towards the war in the Middle East, failing to deal with soft racism, especially against Asylum Seekers(What position has IWCA done or said against Campsfield for instance), and completely dropping any talk of Socialist ideas because it would alienate itself from the electorate.
Nigel said:Is the IWCA going to take a position on the Legalisation Of Cannabis.
The best way to deal with anti social crime with soft drugs.
Are they going to oppose ASBO's, Evictions, Custodial Sentences as the best way of dealing with petty criminals, or would this go against the Little Englander, Sun Reading perspective that you perceive the whole 'working class' in 'their' electorial areas have. I would say its putting the cart before the horse but I don't think that your that naive.
Nigel said:As for the accusation that I'm always 'slagging off' the IWCA then you know that this is untrue. I have leafleted Blackbird Leys during an election (something that I would'nt do now), argued and continue to tell people to vote IWCA in Oxford, not because I think that they are some miraculous answer for the struggle of the working class or socialism, but becuase they are the most proggressive group standing their. I also went against the policies of the Socialist Party; a group that I was and am actively involved in over Blackbird Leys Community Centre of which the IWCA's position was correct.
You're right though -- if only we'd concentrated our energies on the Middle East, it would've all been sorted out by now. Must mention that at the next branch meeting....
poster342002 said:Have you read the two links I posted?
Sue said:Nigel, as you're no doubt aware, the Oxford Mail is infamous for its shoddy reporting. The quote printed was not the full or only quote given by IWCA councillors -- just the only one they chose to print. The point about police priorities in targetting those growing/dealing cannabis rather than those dealing crack/heroin and the comparative destructive impact on the community was made but ignored by the Oxford Mail. As said above, the IWCA had nothing to do with the proceedings against the resident.
Just out of curiosity, what was the full quote, or that of others then?
Nigel said:Is the IWCA going to take a position on the Legalisation Of Cannabis.
The best way to deal with anti social crime with soft drugs.
Charlie Drake said:I remember reading their manifesto - it called for its legalisation.
I keep telling you, these are worth a look on the matter:Nigel said:Which Manifesto. Have you got a website address for that, just been through Oxford IWCA & BL IWCA could'nt find anything.
I never re-called anywhere them openly saying that, but I hope that I am wrong. There was something about doctors proscribing Heroin, and posters against Crack & Heroin Dealers.
What about ASBO's
Heresy! Heresy! Don't you realise that what working class people need is for groups of trotskyite middle-managers, social workers, benefit-inspectors, teachers, office supervisory-grades and assorted other bossy busybody trots to descend upon their areas and jolly well tell them what to think and what to do?Sue said:Unlike other groups, the IWCA regularly goes round and actually *talks* to people to find out what issues concern them.

No mention of ASBO's. I might be wrong but I'm not reading through this bolox again.poster342002 said:I keep telling you, these are worth a look on the matter:
Excellent IWCA article on drugs:
http://www.iwca.info/cutedge/ce0004.htm
Excellent IWCA article on crime:
http://www.iwca.info/cutedge/ce0002.htm
Its quite interesting that you came up with 'Drugs' on this consensous?poster342002 said:Heresy! Heresy! Don't you realise that what working class people need is for groups of trotskyite middle-managers, social workers, benefit-inspectors, teachers, office supervisory-grades and assorted other bossy busybody trots to descend upon their areas and jolly well tell them what to think and what to do?
It's for their own good, after all.![]()

Judging people by your own standards!Sue said:If you go onto www.iwca.info and click on 'manifesto'..
http://www.iwca.info/manifest.htm
Anyway, life really is too short. Have you not got papers to sell or something..?

Fisher_Gate said:I don't think you can claim an area that is 87% white is 'pretty mixed'.
http://www.neighbourhood.statistics...0551&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&enc=1&dsFamilyId=47
.. )poster342002 said:Heresy! Heresy! Don't you realise that what working class people need is for groups of trotskyite middle-managers, social workers, benefit-inspectors, teachers, office supervisory-grades and assorted other bossy busybody trots to descend upon their areas and jolly well tell them what to think and what to do?
It's for their own good, after all.![]()
.. it would be for their own good wouldn't it!!
Fisher_Gate said:I don't think you can claim an area that is 87% white is 'pretty mixed'.
http://www.neighbourhood.statistics...0551&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&enc=1&dsFamilyId=47
Divisive Cotton said:I'd disagree blackbird leys is very noticeable mixed - this is because of the nearby carplant.