Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

"Apple admits" broke "UK boffin invented the iPod"

The one good thing about owning a Nokia is always, but always, being able to find a charger nearby in an emergency. :D

Until they changed the dam things recently to the smaller plug. Its not like you save that much space on the phone.
 
Usage for things like say email, or browsing, would probably tell a very different story.
In what way, exactly?

There's far more people surfing the web on Nokia mobiles than iPhones and RIM completely outshines Apple when it comes mobile email.
 
That's going to be true for sheer numbers, but I bet a much larger percentage of iphone users browse the net using their mobiles. I know loads of people with phones capable of going on the net that didn't know they could or have no inclination to do so.
 
That's going to be true for sheer numbers, but I bet a much larger percentage of iphone users browse the net using their mobiles. I know loads of people with phones capable of going on the net that didn't know they could or have no inclination to do so.
Well, I'm sure they do. And more people probably use Blackberry's for email. And maybe more WM users work on Office documents.

But none of that changes the fact that Nokia are absolutely dominant in the global smartphone market though.
 
For sure, but if a large percentage the users aren't using many of the features, then there is less incentive to try and improve the design. Without wanting to drag up the debate about what a smart phone is, the most advanced thing many people are likely to do with their "smartphone" is take a picture and maybe send it to their mate.
 
Without wanting to drag up the debate about what a smart phone is, the most advanced thing many people are likely to do with their "smartphone" is take a picture and maybe send it to their mate.
Or take a video. Or send a picture message. Loads of users do that all the time. In fact, YouTube is stuffed full of mobile phone clips
 
My Nokia8GB is shit.

I want an iPhone now, TBH.
LOL.

That said I have no interest in anything iPhone. The N95 Nokia is by far better. It has a bigger brain than my iPOD and doesn't fuck about.
Sadly my iPOD has been demoted to a glorified alarm clock via a dock with speakers.

If iPOD and Nokia got together it could be sweet, a 20GB phone that works.

But the iPHONE is little more than a toy to me. Good for girls though, makes a handy compact mirror to check makeup or from which to sniff Bolivian marching powder.
 
Well I covered the picture messaging thing and video is just an extension of that.

I think we're going of on tangents here though. The Nokia interface is unchanged after many years and features like browsing the net, playing music and PIM software could be a lot better.

Like I said a few few posts ago, apple have done little new, just put it together really well. If Nokia had invested a small percentage on the usability of the OS that they had on hardware, then they may something to rival Apple. By putting together a nice package apple are encouraging consumers to things on their phones that they may not have done before or not done regularly because it was to fiddly, despite being possible.
 

What are you LOL'ing about?

In the time since I posted that, my Nokia has gone to shit. Sound cuts out when talking, it crashes when playing music, very slow apps access.

Ever actually owned one, Editor?

Much like the Mac you're keen to slate, I suspect not...
 
Bit of a pronk here.....

But doesnt it state in the article that the inventor used a one button system on his early MP3 player? Could that relate to any claim that he had with the original iPod? If he's claiming that the technology of storing music on a chip was his copyright then why specifially go after apple considering I had a 128MB mp3 player when apple where still trying to save themselves from their completely rubbish GUI.
 
What are you LOL'ing about?

In the time since I posted that, my Nokia has gone to shit. Sound cuts out when talking, it crashes when playing music, very slow apps access.
Well that is unfortunate, but what's made the iPhone suddenly stop appearing like a "toy" and only being "good for girls" as a "compact mirror"?

:D
 
Well that is unfortunate, but what's made the iPhone suddenly stop appearing like a "toy" and only being "good for girls" as a "compact mirror"?

:D

As much as it is a lady's prerogative to change her mind, it is mine to want the upgraded iPhone now that it's fairly stable.
Plus it makes sense to have a machine that syncs with my Macs.
 
As much as it is a lady's prerogative to change her mind, it is mine to want the upgraded iPhone now that it's fairly stable.
Plus it makes sense to have a machine that syncs with my Macs.
Ya rly.

You can make most phones sync with your Mac with the Missing Sync software, by the way - Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Blackberry, WM, Motorola and Palm all work a treat.

http://www.markspace.com/
 
Ya rly.

You can make most phones sync with your Mac with the Missing Sync software, by the way - Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Blackberry, WM, Motorola and Palm all work a treat.

http://www.markspace.com/

I've managed a partial sync, but the calendar data won't sync.

Never has, on any Nokia I've tried, even with the laborious file replacing hacks out there.

What's the "ya rly" about anyway?
 
Really PK? I've never had a problem using isync or any of the plugins from 3rd parties. My new Sony Ericsson (C902) syncs just fine with a £1.50 feisar plugin and I've never had probs with Nokias and macs in the past - in fact they're one of the few where contact pictures sync across easily.
 
I never had problems using third party sync software on sony ericssons....... but nokia's were buggy and motorolas just didnt work 90% of the time.
 
Yeah, actually, I was going to say the same - my N73 syncs well. I think I had to install an iSync application on the actual phone but everything seems to work now. Though the N73 has rather poor PIM functions anyway so I don't sync it that often, I have a Palm for that.

I'd still prefer an iPhone mind you, but only if somebody else is going to pay.
 
I never had problems using third party sync software on sony ericssons....... but nokia's were buggy and motorolas just didnt work 90% of the time.

Sony do generally do a better job with Bluetooth than Nokia, it's true. Sony were actually involved in designing the spec for Bluetooth iirc so that's fair enough.
 
Sony do generally do a better job with Bluetooth than Nokia, it's true. Sony were actually involved in designing the spec for Bluetooth iirc so that's fair enough.
Mind you the Bluetooth on my old Sony laptop was a shocker: it made ridicuous sonar submarine noises when searching for nearby devices and was one of the worst, clunkiest interfaces I'd ever used.
 
Sony do generally do a better job with Bluetooth than Nokia, it's true. Sony were actually involved in designing the spec for Bluetooth iirc so that's fair enough.

That explains it..... I never really got on with modern nokias, always found them to be a bit buggy and that extends to the N95 and the N96. That said the classic nokias like the 3210, 3310 were pieces of art!

I had a motorla A920..... that was the worst for connectivity with my mac.

On my sony ericsson it all worked brill and i even got an app called salling clicker which allowed me to control itunes from the phone which was really handy.
 
Really PK? I've never had a problem using isync or any of the plugins from 3rd parties. My new Sony Ericsson (C902) syncs just fine with a £1.50 feisar plugin and I've never had probs with Nokias and macs in the past - in fact they're one of the few where contact pictures sync across easily.

Well if there's a solution to syncing the N95 8GB I'd be grateful... none of the ones I have found work.
 
One of the key things Apple recognises is that, at heart, it's not a hardware manufacturer.

So many manufacturers make the mistake of thinking software is just some annoying but necessary add on, and that it's all about hardware. It's why there are alot of crap phones that 'Beat' the iPhone but in reality are also-rans. In the phone market, RIM are the other player that understood this (and so did Palm, before they inexplicably faltered).

Anyone with manufacturing experience in this kind of tech, and a reasonable sales reach, can churn out me-too products, but it's not innovation, it's assembling off the shelf stuff into an idea that is easily reproduced. Adding something genuinely unique is the key. Few hardware companies get this - or, at least - are willing to take a leap of faith and make the R&D investment to go there. Shame.

I would agree with the sentiment but in terms of hardware they are probably the most focused hardware/software manufacturer out there. The teams are very likely sitting in the same room. Apple (Steve Jobs) realised a long time ago, that hardware is useless without software to drive it. Unfortunately, giving software developers hardware and expecting results also is a recipe for failure. Both must be working together to achieve a cohesion of usability and simplicity. It looks all so simple, but I know that to pull off both at the same time takes some real innovation but also an iron will.
 
Back
Top Bottom