Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Appalling Guardian hatchet-job on Chomsky

Can someone confirm to me that peebs hasn't actually given any proof for Chomsky's supposed pentagon/shareholding connection? Sure Noam's a well paid professor. IMO that accounts for his equivocal attitude towards social democracy, free speech, etc.
 
Funding from sources we might not consider to be Chomsky's cup of tea are inevitable to someone in his position I think. As a professor at MIT, he's not going to be funded by anarcho groups. The link between the Pentagon and Chomsky's work on linguistics is intriging though. If it exists.

pbman is just desperate. He can't address anything Chomsky says, so has resorted to the usual right wing tactic of character assassination. Now he might want to accuse some of us of the same. It would be true to an extent, except we also address the ideas (e.g. dubya).
 
Jo/Joe said:
p.s. I know you can't just let it go pbman.

You haven't come up with a good reason why i should bother or what particular ideas you want laughed at..............

Its like catching the NRA president, not owing guns.

If that was the case why bother arguing, he clearly doesn't belive.......
 
Jo/Joe said:
Funding from sources we might not consider to be Chomsky's cup of tea are inevitable to someone in his position I think. As a professor at MIT, he's not going to be funded by anarcho groups. The link between the Pentagon and Chomsky's work on linguistics is intriging though. If it exists.
).

Its exists, you just have to look.

But you can't do that with your head in the sand.

pbman is just desperate. He can't address anything Chomsky says, so has resorted to the usual right wing tactic of character assassination. Now he might want to accuse some of us of the same. It would be true to an extent, except we also address the ideas (e.g. dubya).

I'm hardly despearte, i'm here for a good laugh. :rolleyes:

Its no hair off, my ass if you guys "hero worship" a hypocrite.

Matter of fact, that makes it extra funny. :D
 
pbman said:
Its exists, you just have to look.

But you can't do that with your head in the sand.



I'm hardly despearte, i'm here for a good laugh. :rolleyes:

Its no hair off, my ass if you guys "hero worship" a hypocrite.

Matter of fact, that makes it extra funny. :D

C'mon then, show us this "evidence". If it's that easy to find it'll only take you a few seconds to put a link in here, won't it?
 
pbman said:

Opinion pieces and bullshit. How about some credible sources? You know, ones that don't make you look like a horse's arse?

By the way, I googled Chomsky + Pentagon. Guess what?

Nothing credible in the first 3 pages (all I could be bothered to look through). I contrarian piece on "Frontpage" and 1 on "ConspiracyPlanet", but fuck -all worth shit, peebs.

Looks like you're full of shit yet again, little man.
 
ViolentPanda said:
Opinion pieces and bullshit. How about some credible sources? You know, ones that don't make you look like a horse's arse?
.

Its a public record, who reicives federal money. :rolleyes:

Thats why he don't try to deny it. :rolleyes:

He's taken a shitload of money from the pentagon, as stated in my earlier link.

If he hadn't he has a huge lawsuite he can file.

189355497X.01._AA400_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg


Nice book but they spelled his name wrong. :D
 
pbman said:
Its a public record, who reicives federal money. :rolleyes:

Thats why he don't try to deny it. :rolleyes:

He's taken a shitload of money from the pentagon, as stated in my earlier link.

If he hadn't he has a huge lawsuite he can file.

189355497X.01._AA400_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg


Nice book but they spelled his name wrong. :D

Ah, David Horowitz: which means the pages of this book aren't fit to be used on my arse and the opinions contained within aren't worth a shit.

I find it so amusing that I should be ignored by the biggest idiot on Urban. :D
 
nino_savatte said:
Ah, David Horowitz: which means the pages of this book aren't fit to be used on my arse and the opinions contained within aren't worth a shit.

I find it so amusing that I should be ignored by the biggest idiot on Urban. :D
Yep, In other words, peebs' great "proof" is a load of ranty bollocks from the likes of FRONTPAGE.

Not that I'm surprised, it's the sort of near-fascist rightwing vullshit I'd expect a kucker like pbman to lap up.
 
ViolentPanda said:
Yep, In other words, peebs' great "proof" is a load of ranty bollocks from the likes of FRONTPAGE.

Not that I'm surprised, it's the sort of near-fascist rightwing vullshit I'd expect a kucker like pbman to lap up.


D'accord! :cool:
 
I'm hardly despearte, i'm here for a good laugh

Ah, but you are. That's why you're still on this thread and can't accept that we are not moved by your 'argument'.

Do you have any arguments against any of CHomsky's ideas that you can present us, or do we just have reference to a single book?
 
Jo/Joe said:
Ah, but you are. That's why you're still on this thread and can't accept that we are not moved by your 'argument'.
?

You do have trouble with reality don't you?

I don't expect you to care that he's a hypocrite.

The left has a doubel standard, they always exempt themselves.........

Why should chumpski be any different?
 
Do you have any arguments against any of CHomsky's ideas that you can present us, or do we just have reference to a single book?

How many times do I need to ask you this question?
 
Jo/Joe said:
How many times do I need to ask you this question?

You could try actually presenting his "ideas".

Pick your best one, i need a good laugh.

But i'm not wasting time making up your points and mine................

But why bother it blatantly obviouse that chumpski doesn't belive his own bullshit.
 
You're the one with so much to say about him, except anything about the issues he addresses. If you can't do it we'll understand.
 
Jo/Joe said:
You're the one with so much to say about him, except anything about the issues he addresses. If you can't do it we'll understand.

I said they were crap he obviousely didn't agree with himslef. :rolleyes:

Now you can prove different.

I've seen lazy people before, but none so lazy that they expect me argue both sides.

Go ahead and admit you can't do it jo/joe.

You need help from others in all your discutions. :p
 
Good grief is this thread still going?

Pbman ffs stop wasting everyone's time. Okay you don't like Chomsky. We get it. The fact you seem unable to disassociate personal from political however is your problem and should be dealt with behind closed doors like every other disfiguring disease, not displayed proudly to hundreds of other people like some freakshow at the circus. Everyone else, stop baiting him.
 
Rob Ray said:
Good grief is this thread still going?

Pbman ffs stop wasting everyone's time. Okay you don't like Chomsky. We get it. The fact you seem unable to disassociate personal from political however is your problem and should be dealt with behind closed doors like every other disfiguring disease, not displayed proudly to hundreds of other people like some freakshow at the circus. Everyone else, stop baiting him.

I'm just waiting for some of you to admit chumpski is a hyporcrite.

If any of you cought the president of the National rifle association not owning guns you would be on me like flys on shit............ :eek:

It's not like he is just earning a modest living, and doing what he can to get by.

He living fat, off pentagon money, and invisting the profits in dodgy defense companies, and then sheltering the money so he avoids taxes.
 
exosculate said:
Peebs - Chomsky really winds you up - don't he?

:D

If it isn't Chomsky, it's Michael Moore. Beyond that, peebs would have trouble naming any other left wing writer or academic. For him, the right's intellectual heavyweights are people like Coulter, Malkin, Hannity and Limbaugh. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom