Jo/Joe said:p.s. I know you can't just let it go pbman.
Jo/Joe said:Funding from sources we might not consider to be Chomsky's cup of tea are inevitable to someone in his position I think. As a professor at MIT, he's not going to be funded by anarcho groups. The link between the Pentagon and Chomsky's work on linguistics is intriging though. If it exists.
).
pbman is just desperate. He can't address anything Chomsky says, so has resorted to the usual right wing tactic of character assassination. Now he might want to accuse some of us of the same. It would be true to an extent, except we also address the ideas (e.g. dubya).

pbman said:Its exists, you just have to look.
But you can't do that with your head in the sand.
I'm hardly despearte, i'm here for a good laugh.![]()
Its no hair off, my ass if you guys "hero worship" a hypocrite.
Matter of fact, that makes it extra funny.![]()
ViolentPanda said:C'mon then, show us this "evidence". If it's that easy to find it'll only take you a few seconds to put a link in here, won't it?
pbman said:Took all of five seconds.![]()
http://www.google.com/search?source...GGLD,GGLD:2004-21,GGLD:en&q=chomsky+hypocrite
ViolentPanda said:Opinion pieces and bullshit. How about some credible sources? You know, ones that don't make you look like a horse's arse?
.

pbman said:Its a public record, who reicives federal money.![]()
Thats why he don't try to deny it.![]()
He's taken a shitload of money from the pentagon, as stated in my earlier link.
If he hadn't he has a huge lawsuite he can file.
![]()
Nice book but they spelled his name wrong.![]()

Yep, In other words, peebs' great "proof" is a load of ranty bollocks from the likes of FRONTPAGE.nino_savatte said:Ah, David Horowitz: which means the pages of this book aren't fit to be used on my arse and the opinions contained within aren't worth a shit.
I find it so amusing that I should be ignored by the biggest idiot on Urban.![]()
ViolentPanda said:Yep, In other words, peebs' great "proof" is a load of ranty bollocks from the likes of FRONTPAGE.
Not that I'm surprised, it's the sort of near-fascist rightwing vullshit I'd expect a kucker like pbman to lap up.

I'm hardly despearte, i'm here for a good laugh
Jo/Joe said:Ah, but you are. That's why you're still on this thread and can't accept that we are not moved by your 'argument'.
?
Do you have any arguments against any of CHomsky's ideas that you can present us, or do we just have reference to a single book?
Jo/Joe said:How many times do I need to ask you this question?
Jo/Joe said:You're the one with so much to say about him, except anything about the issues he addresses. If you can't do it we'll understand.

Indeed.Rob Ray said:Everyone else, stop baiting him.
Rob Ray said:Good grief is this thread still going?
Pbman ffs stop wasting everyone's time. Okay you don't like Chomsky. We get it. The fact you seem unable to disassociate personal from political however is your problem and should be dealt with behind closed doors like every other disfiguring disease, not displayed proudly to hundreds of other people like some freakshow at the circus. Everyone else, stop baiting him.

Do you honestly think the idiot could even name one of chomsky's books?exosculate said:Peebs - Chomsky really winds you up - don't he?
![]()
Jo/Joe said:Please don't tempt him. He has google and he ain't afraid to use it.
You've no idea at all, have you?pbman said:If any of you cought the president of the National rifle association not owning guns

exosculate said:Peebs - Chomsky really winds you up - don't he?
![]()
