Griff said:The 150 isn't usually the choice of the Jaguar purists, as they tend to favour the first XK120 model from 1949.
For me though it's my fave of the XKs, dunno why, bit like comparing a DB4 to a DB6.

Phototropic said:I prefer that one but only coz it is closer to the MKII which would be my automatic choice if someone offered me a car which they'd pay all petrol and servicing costs for![]()
nogoodboyo said:The MK I/II saloons are prettier than the XK coupes I reckon.
You can get Mk IIs (and other jags) that have been totally reworked underneath these days. Full XJR V8 400hp drivetrain, brakes etc... awesome in a 'why bother' kind of way.

Cause it has an '&' in the URL, and vBulletin won't allow embedded images like that for technical reasons.Phototropic said:EDIT: Why isn't the picture showing thoughI see your code in quote but not on screen.

Griff said:![]()
1959 Jaguar XK150 3.8 Coupe.

zenie said:I have been driven in one of these - a red one.

nogoodboyo said:You can get Mk IIs (and other jags) that have been totally reworked underneath these days. Full XJR V8 400hp drivetrain, brakes etc... awesome in a 'why bother' kind of way.
Just have a look at their current stock.

Phototropic said:if kea and I ever get married I want that to be our wedding car![]()
-
)
kea said:l
(is that the right car? i don't understand all these z-x c-w 321 497-sv stuff)
l

kea said:like this?-
![]()
(is that the right car? i don't understand all these z-x c-w 321 497-sv stuff)
looks pretty nice![]()
