Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Anti-Sharia Rally called by OneLawForAll Nov21st 2009 London

Go and do some proper research and think very carefully about the consequences, Mr. Popularist Bandwagon.
If you're not going to make the tiny amount of effort it takes to read what I'm writing, I don't really think you're in a position to lecture me about researching things.
 
If you're not going to make the tiny amount of effort it takes to read what I'm writing, I don't really think you're in a position to lecture me about researching things.

Avoidance tactic.

Go and do some proper research, Mr. Popularist Bandwagon, and think very carefully about the consequences.
 
me said:
I'm by no means of the opinion that the state can or should prevent religious authorities from arbitrating in disputes between believers, as long as religion exists, it's pretty much innevitable. I'm more bothered by people defending religious courts and communitarian politics.
^repeated for the hard of thinking^
 
I'm asking you to think about the consequences. Mr. Authoritarian Libertarian.
The consequences of what? Of being consistant in my criticism of organised religion? Of not patting reactionary religious figures on the head like some patronising Victorian philanthropist just because they're non-white?
 
So Sharia law is identical to UK secular civil law then?
:D

As I understand it, the results of approved voluntary arbitration are enforceable at law, provided that the ruling is not itself illegal or unconstitutional.

Nothing to see here. If people want to form voluntary associations with enfoceable 'rules' and penalties, that's fine.

Religion is a pile of poop, but the best opposition to it, I think, is to tolerate it to death.
 
^repeated for the hard of thinking^

I got that. You're bothered about people defending religious communities whilst you're busy attacking them! Lolz.

I'm seeing radical muslim feminists try to reform 50s male dominated life from within. There's nothing to stop muslim women becoming specialists in Islamic religious law. I believe their prophet's wife, Aisha was one such woman. There's no religious edict preventing womens' participation in mosque life (communal worship), no religious edict preventing women's religious scholarship, no religious edict preventing women's legal expertise, no religious edict preventing women's participation in political life. British Muslim women are actively trying to eradicate that old-fashioned 50s-style male dominance - a male dominance that is not Islamic, but culturally influenced. Only an idiot would look down on religiously-minded feminists and try to make out they're not part of the wider feminist movement to improve rights for women, and give them no support whatsoever to stand with men as political, social, sexual and spiritual equals.
 
:D

As I understand it, the results of approved voluntary arbitration are enforceable at law, provided that the ruling is not itself illegal or unconstitutional.

Nothing to see here. If people want to form voluntary associations with enfoceable 'rules' and penalties, that's fine.

Religion is a pile of poop, but the best opposition to it, I think, is to tolerate it to death.
Spot on. Except I'd add, tolerate it to death while attempting to show better ways of organising social life
 
This is what a radical muslim feminist looks like

146712343_13bc3438ca.jpg
 
I got that. You're bothered about people defending religious communities whilst you're busy attacking them! Lolz.
And that's what "religious courts and communitarian politics" means, is it? Dimwit.

You can appeal to scripture all you like (though it's a little odd for a non-Muslim to do so), but the reality of Islam as it actually exists and is experienced by the vast majority of Muslims is that it's as much a partriarchical institution as the other main religions in this country.
 
Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator
Compelling stuff.

Anyway, I'm well aware that some people believe that it's possible to reconcile both Abrahamic religion and feminism without making major compromises on both. It just happens to be the case that they're both wrong and stupid.
 
It's hard to imagine how an ideology which gives men freedom to marry who they want but not women can be reconcilable with religion, I agree. I wonder how these shariah courts in the UK would treat women who married non muslim men.
 
I wonder how these shariah courts in the UK would treat women who married non muslim men.
This sentence shows you haven't understood the basics of this issue. These courts are only given authority by parties to an issue assenting to submit to their arbitration.
 
Do women and men have equality in Britain yet? Is equality enshrined in civil law? No.
Do employers treat men and women equally yet? No. Women are still being sacked for becoming pregnant. Men are never sacked for becoming fathers.
 
Do women and men have equality in Britain yet? Is equality enshrined in civil law? No.
Do employers treat men and women equally yet? No. Women are still being sacked for becoming pregnant. Men are never sacked for becoming fathers.

but that isnt an argument for formalising another (even more) patriarchal legal system

however whilst i oppose any religion within the legal system its difficult to make a case that only sharia should be singled out when we the beth din is accepted and the mainstream legal system is steeped in christianity
 
but that isnt an argument for formalising another (even more) patriarchal legal system

however whilst i oppose any religion within the legal system its difficult to make a case that only sharia should be singled out when we the beth din is accepted and the mainstream legal system is steeped in christianity

we have been a christian country for over a thousand years. so tradition and history and culture is christian. We are not an islamic country and have no hisotry of islamic influence. Church courts only deal with church matters these days.
Sharia is grossly unfair towards women as is beth din. Beth din has been part of UK life since the 1600s so 400 years of history.
Sharia is not part of UK culture tough.
 
we have been a christian country for over a thousand years. so tradition and history and culture is christian. We are not an islamic country and have no hisotry of islamic influence. Church courts only deal with church matters these days.
Sharia is grossly unfair towards women as is beth din. Beth din has been part of UK life since the 1600s so 400 years of history.
Sharia is not part of UK culture tough.
That's a pretty shit argument though. Indian takeaways are a pretty recent thing in the UK too, should they have been banned in order to protect British restaurants?
 
Do women and men have equality in Britain yet? Is equality enshrined in civil law? No.
Do employers treat men and women equally yet? No. Women are still being sacked for becoming pregnant. Men are never sacked for becoming fathers.
So? UK law being shit is no defence of Sharia, anymore than the opposite case is true.
 
we have been a christian country for over a thousand years. so tradition and history and culture is christian. We are not an islamic country and have no hisotry of islamic influence. Church courts only deal with church matters these days.
Sharia is grossly unfair towards women as is beth din. Beth din has been part of UK life since the 1600s so 400 years of history.
Sharia is not part of UK culture tough.

here, here, on with the crusade
 
This is in danger of mixing issues and stoking hone-grown racism.

Certainly, there's a lot wrong with Sharia, and with Beth Din, and with "ecclesistical" courts in general. We don't need bearded weirdos making laws and running gaols, like we used to have.

So any embrace of Sharia, or other religious law must be voluntary, and within the parameters of ordinary civil and criminal law. But if people want to use religious institutions to mediate in disputes, make the decision freely, and this is done within the regular framework of the law, then it's no-one else's business.

Unfortunately, this group seems to lump the "Sharia" of the North-West Frontier with UK practice. I think this is intended, militant secularism is their thing.

A tolerant society cannot in all conscience legislate against vicars and the like arbitrating in disputes, if both parties want that.

So your saying its ok for Roman Catholic priests to order abortions if the woman concerned is a practising Catholic then?

Im sorry but as far as Im concerned I live in a secular state along with my muslim , christian and aetheist brothers and sisters.
 
That's a pretty shit argument though. Indian takeaways are a pretty recent thing in the UK too, should they have been banned in order to protect British restaurants?

no but sort of explains why we have christian mumbo jumbo and beth din allowed. See no real reason to add another old fashioned illogical law system.
want a muslim legal system move to an islamic state.
Don't stay in the 21st centuary
 
no but sort of explains why we have christian mumbo jumbo and beth din allowed. See no real reason to add another old fashioned illogical law system.
want a muslim legal system move to an islamic state.
Don't stay in the 21st centuary
We have a separation of church and state and religious tolerance. If you want intolerance I suggest you move somewhere else
 
Back
Top Bottom