Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

[Johnny Canuck3]

Well, if it's any consolation, [not that it should be!] it means that you don't know what you're missing.

Thanks, but if what you and jessie says is true, then all I'd be missing would be a penchant for premature ejaculation.

 

[Jessiedog]

If it's been disposed of, then why are doctors still debating the issue? Is yours the last word on the subject?

*sigh*

I repeat, not ONE SINGLE reputable medical association recommends the surgery due the the fact that the PROVEN risks outweigh any POTENTIAL benfits.

*sigh*

Woof

 

[Jessiedog]

To the extent that I'm defensive, it was brought on by your post insinuating that circumcised males are somehow disabled and defective.

I was just stating facts about the nature and composition of the prepuce.



Woof

 

[Jessiedog]

And I note you've still not responded to my question, JC - so I'll ask yet again.

If RIMC is permitted - how can banning sunna (my definition,) be justified?

If sunna is banned - how can RIMC be justified?



Woof

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

*sigh*

I repeat, not ONE SINGLE reputable medical association recommends the surgery due the the fact that the PROVEN risks outweigh any POTENTIAL benfits.

*sigh*

Woof

But, your saying it doesn't make it so. I've seen a number of studies that indicate some potential benefit.

As I've said before, if you were right, the debate would be over, at least in the medical world.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

And I note you've still not responded to my question, JC - so I'll ask yet again.

If RIMC is permitted - how can banning sunna (my definition,) be justified?

If sunna is banned - how can RIMC be justified?



Woof

Because there's been no relationship averred between AIDS and the female clitoral hood.

 

[Jessiedog]

Because there's been no relationship averred between AIDS and the female clitoral hood.

I guess this procedure is not being studied in the same way to see what useful preventive action might be pinned to it.

Woof

 

[Jessiedog]

As I've said before, if you were right, the debate would be over, at least in the medical world.

The fact that the debate isn't over, is down to the factors I've already explained here, JC....twice. I'm sure others reading the thread haven't missed them, even if you may have.

But, your saying it doesn't make it so. I've seen a number of studies that indicate some potential benefit.

Well, if you can find a single, reputable, medical body that "recommends" RIMC, please post that information on this thread ASAP.

Otherwise.........

I rest my case.



Woof

 

[Jessiedog]

Because there's been no relationship averred between AIDS and the female clitoral hood.

And just because a few doctors with vested interests continue to "averr" an unproven relationship between male circumcision and HIV transmission in some parts of Africa, doesn't make it so.

And what this has to do with the ongoing mutilation of the genitals of millions of young boys in the US is, frankly, beyond me.



Woof

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

The fact that the debate isn't over, is down to the factors I've already explained here, JC....twice. I'm sure others reading the thread haven't missed them, even if you may have.





Well, if you can find a single, reputable, medical body that "recommends" RIMC, please post that information on this thread ASAP.

Otherwise.........

I rest my case.



Woof

'Recommends', for what?

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Jessie, you have an interesting argument style. Basically, yours is the final word on the matter. Same as with the discussion on the falun gong. They don't exist in china, according to you, and that's that. No further argument entertained.

 

[nino_savatte]

Jessie, you have an interesting argument style. Basically, yours is the final word on the matter. Same as with the discussion on the falun gong. They don't exist in china, according to you, and that's that. No further argument entertained.

No, Johnny. Jessie has you over a barrel on this one. Have the good grace to concede. This isn't you in some court of law defending a drunk driver.

 

[Jessiedog]

'Recommends', for what?

Recommends RIMC.

Can't find one then?



Woof

 

[Jessiedog]

Jessie, you have an interesting argument style. Basically, yours is the final word on the matter. Same as with the discussion on the falun gong. They don't exist in china, according to you, and that's that. No further argument entertained.

Not my word, JC.

I'm going by the statements of the world's reputable medical bodies. And will be happy to agree that one of them recommends RIMC if you can show me the relevant statement.

Can you?


Regarding the FG, if you can find any recent statements issued by the organisation from within the mainland, I'd be prepared to reconsider my position that the organisation has been disbanded in mainland China.

Can you?



Woof