Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Another reason not to vote for Livingslime

GarfieldLeChat said:
not you weren't in the slightest... you barrelled in with some kind of defender of the faith tip and moaned i wasn't concerring with city dreams...

none of your concern but you insinuated yourself in there regardless, it's netiehr polite to city dreams who's more than capable of speaking up for themselves or to me to make assumptions about the situation and then attempt to bend it to your will and no amount of simlies take away from the intent of the comment.

so please love, don't shame yourself further, by claiming a moral high ground you have neither the stature nor the armies to maintain...

e2a

also the same goes for conversaitions between me and any other poster unless it's directed at you don't jump in to 'save others' who are totally capable of 'saving themselves'...

if that's ok...
Click to expand...

I'll say it again, what an arrogant, ignorant cunt. :D
 
El Jefe said:
I'll say it again, what an arrogant, ignorant cunt. :D
Click to expand...

yes dub you are ... we don't all need reminding now about that ignore button.

can you beahve like an adult at all...

i really don't want to force the issue but tbh i don't give that much of a shit you inmpact directly on my life as only pasing of time does nothing worth noticing or paying mind too, but something which is constnatly there...

however some 4 years or so this has continued and you are far to childish to let it go so really take the grown up option, what's the alternative you get steadly more middle aged with higher and higher blood pressure being wound up and feeling some sort of compulsion to have to tell others and put them in their place, particularlly for some wierd obbsessional reason me until your heart gives out...

grow man...

really it's about time...

before the big 50 at least...
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
not you weren't in the slightest... you barrelled in with some kind of defender of the faith tip and moaned i wasn't concerring with city dreams...

none of your concern but you insinuated yourself in there regardless, it's netiehr polite to city dreams who's more than capable of speaking up for themselves or to me to make assumptions about the situation and then attempt to bend it to your will and no amount of simlies take away from the intent of the comment.

so please love, don't shame yourself further, by claiming a moral high ground you have neither the stature nor the armies to maintain...

e2a

also the same goes for conversaitions between me and any other poster unless it's directed at you don't jump in to 'save others' who are totally capable of 'saving themselves'...

if that's ok...
Click to expand...

erm, why don't you go back and read the thread. Citydreams and I were having a conversation and YOU barrelled in and made some lame dig at HIM.

want me to quote it for you?

I wasn't trying to save anyone, i was just pointing out you were being a bit silly, something you are seem eager to do to others and wondering what you knew about data modelling, which was the point of OUR conversation, something you seemed less keen to answer

funny that.

also at no point did i abuse you or call you a 'little girl' so lets keep it above board eh.

cos perish the thought you stand accused of double standards though!

and wtf does this even mean -

GarfieldLeChat said:
so please love, don't shame yourself further, by claiming a moral high ground you have neither the stature nor the armies to maintain...
Click to expand...

:D
 
El Jefe said:
FANTASTIC comeback :D

Playgroundtastic :D
Click to expand...

see this is where you and i differ dearie, i'm not trying to come back, i'm asking you why after 4 years of this pathetic nonsense where clearly i irritate the fuckrey outta you that you continue it further...

as i said if it's that tiedious and annoying to you then you have the ignore option.

or would that prevent your having to put me in my place attitude and therefore deny some vital aspect of your charchter...

as i said you can change the name but underneith it all you're still precisely the same like some shit rail francise... new name new logo shame shower...

grow up child really...
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
that's right at HIM what was YOUR concern in the matter...
Click to expand...

according to you I didn't think it was acceptable to wade in to other peoples conversations :confused:

and if you do such a thing AND get pulled on it at least try and come back with some kind of decent retort/answer the question put to you for the basis of your intervention instead of inane ramblings and weird mutterings about 'armies'

basically, jog on Garf, your not making a lot of sense here to be honest :D
 
Dan U said:
according to you I didn't think it was acceptable to wade in to other peoples conversations :confused:

and if you do such a thing AND get pulled on it at least try and come back with some kind of decent retort/answer the question put to you for the basis of your intervention instead of inane ramblings and weird mutterings about 'armies'

basically, jog on Garf, your not making a lot of sense here to be honest :D
Click to expand...

your miscomprehension doesn't make your straw man any more real...

but ok you disagree with waht i didn't say and think that's a bad thing...

well done thanks for that...

enlightening as always...
 
Dan U said:
what straw man is that?
Click to expand...

the one where you have read my wors into something entirely different...

but hey...

can't be arsed...

Dan U said:
i apologise for not realising you and citydreams have an ongoing feud on the board and i will ensure i update my spreadsheet tracking all of urbans ongoing disagreements for future reference! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

make sure you do, particuarllly if you're going to continue this knight in shining armour schtick...

Dan U said:
you never did answer the question i asked you last night, which was what experience you have of data collection, mining and analysis?
Click to expand...

in transport none, in IT quite a lot...

however my data miniing skill set and how that is relevant to opinions on posters or the transport polices are influencing to the detriment of the local population in london i have no idea.


Dan U said:
which is how this all started when you waded in with your photography comment.
Click to expand...

i waded no where i direct a comment squarely at a poster.

Dan U said:
how are your maintained armies btw :D
Click to expand...

how are you with metaphors again.
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
the one where you have read my wors into something entirely different...

but hey...

can't be arsed...



make sure you do, particuarllly if you're going to continue this knight in shining armour schtick...



in transport none, in IT quite a lot...

however my data miniing skill set and how that is relevant to opinions on posters or the transport polices are influencing to the detriment of the local population in london i have no idea.




i waded no where i direct a comment squarely at a poster.



how are you with metaphors again.
Click to expand...

oh ffs.

i haven't read anything in to your words, although your streams of consciousness, arrogance, patronising of people and abuse are quite tiresome to keep up with sometimes. you could always give me an example?

i did no knight in shining armour schtick. i asked you a simple question, one you chose not to respond to and instead just started giving it the large and calling people little girls. i'm not prepared to just let that slide in this instance.

i've obviously made a mental note to never again dare to address the mighy Garfield Le Chat on the internet! :rolleyes:

if you had answered my question initially NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED. it wasn't difficult to give a simple answer to a simple question was it. thanks for finally getting there.

your metaphors are lost on me, sorry.

you are hard work Garf :D
 
Dan U said:
i haven't read anything in to your words, although your streams of consciousness, arrogance, patronising of people and abuse are quite tiresome to keep up with sometimes. you could always give me an example?
Click to expand...

erm you tying yourself up in knots here not me you gave your own expample in your previous post which i quoted, thanks for tha ad homs on the way to explaing that you were making comment on something you neither understood or indeed it turns out were even aware you were commenting on...

Dan U said:
i did no knight in shining armour schtick. i asked you a simple question, one you chose not to respond to and instead just started giving it the large and calling people little girls. i'm not prepared to just let that slide in this instance.
Click to expand...

bollocks... you did... whatever though...

Dan U said:
i've obviously made a mental note to never again dare to address the mighy Garfield Le Chat on the internet! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

good for you prehas a mental note not to argue straw men might be more appropreate...

Dan U said:
if you had answered my question initially NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED. it wasn't difficult to give a simple answer to a simple question was it. thanks for finally getting there.
Click to expand...

you're welcome again it doens't specify how it's relevant, however...

Dan U said:
your metaphors are lost on me, sorry.
Click to expand...

evidently...

Dan U said:
you are hard work Garf :D
Click to expand...

i'm hard work... jesus you should see what you City and Dub look like from behind my eyes... however i do apologise if my disabilty with communication makes it harder for you to comprehend, i'll conceed that it might, although i have no idea not viewing it through others eyes.
 
More posts from the Garf nonsense rant-o-rama then, with the words 'ad hominen,' 'strawman' peppering the usual thought-free stream of consciousness.

Is this some kind of bizarre game where Garf points out his own faults in a stream of accusatory babble?

:D
 
tarannau said:
More posts from the Garf nonsense rant-o-rama then, with the words 'ad hominen,' 'strawman' peppering the usual thought-free stream of consciousness.

Is this some kind of bizarre game where Garf points out his own faults in a stream of accusatory babble?

:D
Click to expand...

It does rather seem that way :D

But Dan U is right, let's leave the buffoon to rant into the ether :)
 
El Jefe said:
It does rather seem that way :D

But Dan U is right, let's leave the buffoon to rant into the ether :)
Click to expand...

except you can't can you...

it's ok i accept your love dub but it's never going to happen ever...

so please before i need a restraining order...

i really don't think of you in that way...
 
tarannau said:
More posts from the Garf nonsense rant-o-rama then, with the words 'ad hominen,' 'strawman' peppering the usual thought-free stream of consciousness.

Is this some kind of bizarre game where Garf points out his own faults in a stream of accusatory babble?

:D
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

god for you glad you had your 5 cents too...

toddle off somewhere else now these a good girl...
 
littlebabyjesus said:
I posted this on another thread.


Only a nasty cunt would publish that.
Click to expand...


Text from the quoted article:The report also includes Mr Johnson's views on Iraq (wide-eyed admiration for American troops, admittedly dating from 2004), George Bush, whom he supported in 2000 and 2004, climate change ("When Bush says no [to Kyoto], he is doing what is right not just for America but for the world"),

God help you Londoners if that's who will become the new mayor. On top of that there are also some other incredible and rather shocking remarks he makes.

I mean, when someone who believes that Bush is doing what is right for not just America but also for the world, that's a madmen, I certainly wouldn't want a Bush supporter as a mayor, especially when it's so important.

Perhaps Livingstone isn't the best, but as has been said this guy isn't any better.
 
If anyone is still deciding who they are going to vote for, or who there second choice is going to be, check out www.votematch.co.uk. In fact, even if you know who you're going to vote for, have a look at it anyway.

It's simple and quick. You answer 25 questions and then see which of the candidates is most suited to you. So far over 25,000 Londoners have used it.
 
That was interesting. I was Sian, then Livingstone, both strongly matched. BoJo was well, well down the list.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Petition for all of UK to vote for London Mayor
Replies
26
Views
1K
weltweit
weltweit
Sasaferrato
Who do I vote for?
2 3
Replies
70
Views
2K
geminisnake
geminisnake
RubyBlue
Who to vote for?
Replies
14
Views
653
dessiato
dessiato
hash tag
Time for a Lucy Powell thread
Replies
2
Views
139
redsquirrel
R
tim
Dammit, Dannatt is another sleazy Lord on the take.
Replies
1
Views
203
kebabking
kebabking
Back
Top Bottom