Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Animal Rights - how far do you go?

The cause of animal rights/liberation is such that I would -

  • Die for the cause

    Votes: 5 5.3%
  • Go to prison for the cause/have been to prison

    Votes: 8 8.5%
  • Will join animal rights/protection groups as an activist but not break the law or risk imprisonment

    Votes: 7 7.4%
  • Will join rights groups but not go on demos etc

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Will sign petitions, donate £$£$ etc but not join anything/get directly involved

    Votes: 7 7.4%
  • Mint sauce

    Votes: 66 70.2%

  • Total voters
    94
  • Poll closed .
taffboy gwyrdd said:
1 billion.

Thats the amount of creatures killed needlessly for consumption in this country alone each year.

1,000,000,000

Thats a lot of killing innit?

Why are we never told?

Gordon Ramsey says veggies are cunts thats good enough for me :cool:
 
taffboy gwyrdd said:
1 billion.

Thats the amount of creatures killed needlessly for consumption in this country alone each year.

1,000,000,000

Thats a lot of killing innit?

Why are we never told?

You're being soft.

Don't think just follow, you are what you eat after all.
 
taffboy gwyrdd said:
1 billion.

Thats the amount of creatures killed needlessly for consumption in this country alone each year.

1,000,000,000

Thats a lot of killing innit?

Why are we never told?
It's not "needless", it's fucking tasty :cool:
 
Got to say that this poll is fundamentally flawed - there is a huge range of possitbilities between and around these options, which if I was nailed down would have to say I come into. As it is I don't come into either or any presented;

b) Go to prison for the cause/have been to prison

c) Will join animal rights/protection groups as an activist but not break the law or risk imprisonment
 
Animal rights is the ultimate 'lost cause' it has no support from anyone outside the AR 'nutterati' personally I think people get involved in the extremes of AR because they are psychologically flawed in their relations to other humans and in relation to their own image of themselves.

Anyway I'm not going to waste anymore bandwidth or time talking about ARfash.

They are scum. Not those who choose to avoid animal products for moral reasons but the grave robbers and other shits.
 
KeyboardJockey said:
Animal rights is the ultimate 'lost cause' it has no support from anyone outside the AR 'nutterati' personally I think people get involved in the extremes of AR because they are psychologically flawed in their relations to other humans and in relation to their own image of themselves.

Anyway I'm not going to waste anymore bandwidth or time talking about ARfash.

They are scum. Not those who choose to avoid animal products for moral reasons but the grave robbers and other shits.

This is more divide and rule, similar to that aimed at the working class movement, where 'extremists' are left to swing by the liberal left, which ultimately sows division within the progressive movement. There have always been those in progressive campaigns who were prepared to go that one bit further than what is portrayed as the 'respectable majority'. The 'respectable majority' however is a chimera, and I have no problems with those who practiced wild direct action within working class movement history. For example the Rebeccaites or the Luddites...
 
I wonder if those who've ticked the 'I'd die for the cause' option would be quite as keen to assert that if the poll were public...
 
but even on a leftie web board animal rights gets laughed at
its not needless death there tasty mankind has eaten meat since it existed
 
likesfish said:
but even on a leftie web board animal rights gets laughed at
its not needless death there tasty mankind has eaten meat since it existed

What about 'womenkind' - have they?

Also there has been ethical and religious vegetarianism/veganism for a long time too - just cos it exists doesn't make something right...
 
Nicky Cleveland said:
There is no reason to eat meat, apart from barbarism.

I agree, there is no reason. Meat is harder to grow and more wasteful of available resources isn't it. Or that's what I read somewhere... forget where...
 
guinnessdrinker said:
which sauce would go with a roasted animal right supporter?

Gentlemen's Relish of course!

Veggies and especially vegans cum tastes better than rotting flesh eaters apperently.
 
I said "mint sauce", but I meant tartare.

I was a vegan for 20 years, but I now catch the odd fish (though most of them are treated very well and go back alive.)

The tartare sauce is a bit iffy as I generally prefer to avoid dairy and eggs.
I can't imagine myself eating mammals any time soon.

I suspect at some point this summer I will be making the freshest mackerel sushi imaginable - Bear Grylls style :eek:
Every sea angler should carry sushi condiments in his tackle bag :cool:
 
DrRingDing said:
Gentlemen's Relish of course!

Veggies and especially vegans cum tastes better than rotting flesh eaters apperently.

I'm told that the secret to making it taste nice is to eat lots of cinnamon. Makes it slightly sweet, apparently.

I've not found a gentleman to try this out with yet, though. :D
 
taffboy gwyrdd said:
1 billion.

Thats the amount of creatures killed needlessly for consumption in this country alone each year.

1,000,000,000

Thats a lot of killing innit?

Why are we never told?
Why do you need telling?

Just look in the meat sections of any supermarket. You don't think all that meat comes from 1 little animal do you? :eek:
 
Attica said:
I agree, there is no reason. Meat is harder to grow and more wasteful of available resources isn't it. Or that's what I read somewhere... forget where...
Wild animals manage to do it OK.
 
Attica said:
I agree, there is no reason. Meat is harder to grow and more wasteful of available resources isn't it. Or that's what I read somewhere... forget where...
There's "no reason" to eat crisps or chocolate either, people have this odd habbit of eating things just because they like it. The decadant bastards.

Anyway, when you think about it, farm animals exist in symbiosis with human being anyway. If we didn't keep them for food, they would die, since they aren't fit to survive in the wild. It's only fair that we get to eat their flesh once they're not using it.
 
In Bloom said:
There's "no reason" to eat crisps or chocolate either, people have this odd habbit of eating things just because they like it. The decadant bastards.

Anyway, when you think about it, farm animals exist in symbiosis with human being anyway. If we didn't keep them for food, they would die, since they aren't fit to survive in the wild. It's only fair that we get to eat their flesh once they're not using it.

Can we barbecue you when you're dead?
 
DrRingDing said:
Can we barbecue you when you're dead?
If you like, it's not like I'd notice.

Though it'd be mostly gristle and bone anyway, so I wouldn't reccomend it.

Not really seeing the relevance though.
 
Do people really still think there's such an unbridgeable qualitative difference between humans and other animals?!

That's really rather quaint (barbaric, but quaint) :p
 
Jonti said:
Do people really still think there's such an unbridgeable qualitative difference between humans and other animals?!

That's really rather quaint (barbaric, but quaint) :p

Meat eaters = closet creationists.

I like that.
 
Back
Top Bottom