I think the point is that the White Horse is some quite ancient symbol of the South of Englang. Something connected to this
![]()
which it could be argued is pointless too, but isn't it glorious?![]()
It is glorious. It is an old and beautiful form of art, organically altered and improved over centuries, with the added effects of natural erosion/encroachment over time.
But here's the thing: it's not just a big horse. There's a difference, see?
*sigh*
I need to go and do some work.
I think the point is that the White Horse is some quite ancient symbol of the South of Englang. Something connected to this
![]()
which it could be argued is pointless too, but isn't it glorious?![]()
The Uffington horse is ancient and the styalisation makes it a stunning thing.
The thing they're gonna throw up in Ebbsfleet is just a big horse standing in a field, near some pylons, looking bored.
*cough* patroniser *cough*
Unsurprisingly, they're all dreadful. None have any plausible connection to the place or say anything beyond the utterly banal. Aside from the horse and the death ray, they're all actually ugly (you know, not pleasing to the eye). This is, of course, part of the postmodern attempt to "re-educate" the public into switching our natural preference for the elegant and harmonious to the grotesque and discordant.
The wing and satellite dish has echoes of Fascist iconography.
The horse is a totally pointless example of contextless naturalism, having neither symbolic nor literal meaning. It says, "Horse". Nothing more, nothing less. You might as well build an inland lighthouse.
The polyhedra tower and Ms Whiteread's feeble and derivative attempt are simply beneath contempt. I wish someone would build a cast around Ms Whiteread and tip it into the Thames.
Now the Thiepval Memorial on the other hand is one of my favourite buildings. Dignified, extremely restrained, solid. It stands as an undeniable foot in the earth, both marking and making the place and giving focus and a centre of gravity to the cemetery around it.
Bring back Lutyens, from the dead if necessary. His country needs him.
We don't need an "Angel of the South" anyway. We need a better reason for throwing up a structure than the simple fact that the Northerners have got one.

It echoes the banality of the Milton Keynes concrete cows.


Looks more like a seaside donkey than the Invicta horse. Apparently the way it is positioned means anyone driving into London will get a lovely view of its arse. Quite appropriate perhaps? Wonder if he will be anatomically correct.I like the big horse.
![]()
Angel of the North
vs
Horse of the South
![]()
may I be the several millionth northerner to say hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaha![]()
Yes, I like the horse but the angel is definitely more striking!
I have actually met the artists of both sculptures on different occasions as they had exhibitions at a contemporary art gallery I worked in some years ago![]()


Very obviously it's a blank slate for you all to scribble across.
I wonder how long that will take.![]()


Is it only me who finds the Angel a bit meh. I know there's not much to do around Gateshead, but it's a bit inoffensive and underwhelming really.
I suppose at least the white horse is much larger. I just don't think anything down, short of a giant pair of fingers flicking the v, would attract as much attention or local pride down here.
I must admit I have never seen the Angel 'in situ' but other people have told me it looks good.

