Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Anarchist Bookfair, Saturday 27th October, London

Taxamo Welf said:
My point, without engaging in menaningless adversity, was tyhat i think they are one and the same comrade.
We may be talking past each other to some extent but I think the difference is one of practice as something that sometimes follows from theory (telling people what to do and sometimes doing stuff) and theory supporting and informing practice (primarily doing stuff and sometimes getting together to discuss and situate what you're doing in a wider context).

um, no i think i was saying he IS a syndicalist. Thats is the branch of anarchism he identifies with, on the whole. I'm not a chomsky reader or in fact much of a reader, but i think he is a syndicalist overall, but spends most of his time using his position as an intellectual to campaign and educate.
Sorry I read "is" as "isn't" :o
 
Taxamo Welf said:
i'll give you a clue - on another board, theres a 7 page thread ;)

I assumed there would be, but some perfectly sound people are (now) on both forums -- lets have threads in more than one place!

RADICAL! :p

Seems like I plugged a gap on Urban anyway, with posting this, so tis all good :)
 
Taxamo Welf said:
My point, without engaging in menaningless adversity, was tyhat i think they are one and the same comrade.
But they're really not. Unless we're going to assume that there's some homogeneous mass of Ordinary People out there, waiting to be told what's what*, offering "solutions" and "alternatives" is a bit meaningless, not because it's oppressive or whatever, but because it's a bit of a waste of time.


*Not that I'm suggesting that this is what you think, but I don't see how the whole idea is supposed to work otherwise.
 
William of Walworth said:
I assumed there would be, but some perfectly sound people are (now) on both forums -- lets have threads in more than one place!

RADICAL! :p

Seems like I plugged a gap on Urban anyway, with posting this, so tis all good :)
I was pretty surprised to see that you'd started this, tbh. I wouldn't have thought it'd be your kind of thing.

Honestly, it's not mine, I just go for the piss up ;)
 
Taxamo Welf said:
Aleister Crowley said that 'Do what Thou Wilt, Shall be the Whole of The Law' - and he was utterly fucking wrong. Has exactly nothing to do with anarchism in my opinion.

Everyone misunderstands that one.

It's not the chaos punk version, it's an incitement to leading lives of unswerving dedication to your purpose, whatever that might be...
 
rich! said:
Everyone misunderstands that one.

It's not the chaos punk version, it's an incitement to leading lives of unswerving dedication to your purpose, whatever that might be...

...and in Crowley's case that was ripping people off, and fucking them about big time, which adds up to the same thing in the end...The man even drew a knob on his head to make things clear.
 
In Bloom said:
But they're really not. Unless we're going to assume that there's some homogeneous mass of Ordinary People out there, waiting to be told what's what*, offering "solutions" and "alternatives" is a bit meaningless, not because it's oppressive or whatever, but because it's a bit of a waste of time.


*Not that I'm suggesting that this is what you think, but I don't see how the whole idea is supposed to work otherwise.
actually mate thats exactly what i'm saying. Homogenous mass or not, there are some base facts for all of us and there are some blatant fucking injustices we could be doing a lot more about; i do think its worth putting anarchism forward as a way of solving problems, cos if its not wtf is the point? If we can't say to people that anarchism is a useful theory for sorting out their problems...
 
nosos said:
We may be talking past each other to some extent but I think the difference is one of practice as something that sometimes follows from theory (telling people what to do and sometimes doing stuff) and theory supporting and informing practice (primarily doing stuff and sometimes getting together to discuss and situate what you're doing in a wider context).

TBH this is ALL not enough - the answer is praxis:D We start from participating in class struggle and see what happens :D Not standing on the sidelines trying to create something apriori pure, rather as the class struggle develops radical theory discovers itself in the midst of these ever wider and connecting struggles.
 
In Bloom said:
I was pretty surprised to see that you'd started this, tbh. I wouldn't have thought it'd be your kind of thing.

Honestly, it's not mine, I just go for the piss up

You think I'm NOT going for the pissup? :p (at least partly ... )

But I have some specific underground literature I'm looking out for, that I'm unlikely to find elsewhere that easily.

I come from a countercultural/old school free festivals/direct action/eco protest-friendly direction on this sorta thing ("Lifestyleist!!!!" ) plus the history of it all interests me. Being a historian by background, it would be wrong not to take an interest in the lterature of radical ideas. I've been a bit of a collector at times as well.

And I have a passing bit of professional interest ;) in underground presses, subversive publications, wild art and graphics, and the like.

I was never much of an activist myself, being a lazy stoner twat :o but I have a genuine interest. I'm not an anarchist really, but I respect a lot of ideas coming from that general area ...

Also, Deb is keen to visit the ABF :) :cool:

Noted absence of a thread yet, and plugged a gap ...
 
Attica said:
TBH this is ALL not enough - the answer is praxis:D We start from participating in class struggle and see what happens :D Not standing on the sidelines trying to create something apriori pure, rather as the class struggle develops radical theory discovers itself in the midst of these ever wider and connecting struggles.
That's pretty much what I mean - I was just trying to avoid using the term praxis :p
 
Back
Top Bottom