Having just read this 118118 on on the ICC i see it's just a big pisstake. Ok, well done. Great.
anarchism and "authoritarianism"
- Thread starter 118118
- Start date
Amongst the working classes (Well I don't know).
Wtf is this conversation about? You want to discuss whether op was unreasonable, then fine?
You want to pull me up on whether I am as imbeclic as Karen, then I'm not sure I can be bothered. I, unlike anarchsist, don't want to humilate people into being like them. Just a rational discussion about the merits of.. whatever, being a prick to weak people.
That was such a lovely conversation as well
Wtf is this conversation about? You want to discuss whether op was unreasonable, then fine?
You want to pull me up on whether I am as imbeclic as Karen, then I'm not sure I can be bothered. I, unlike anarchsist, don't want to humilate people into being like them. Just a rational discussion about the merits of.. whatever, being a prick to weak people.
That was such a lovely conversation as well
Have you been on the glue?
118118 said:
Well, i'd try and understand them for a start. You clearly haven't. Then i'd get cracking on why they haven't. If i were to go down that road paved with such pretty flowers.
northernhord
Active Member
Karen Eliot said:Jesus fucking christ
Some qaulity debate here. An anachist was rude to me on the internet--> loads of other sad saps that passing anarchists were once rude to jump on 'they were rude to me too'! = a nice little model. What was university like lads? Tried life yet?
Hehehe
*Spits coffee out onto Monitor*
118118 said:
No, i'm asking you to connect your points in the above post to mine - to posts that i've made or to arguments that i've put forward. Because, there's plenty gap between the two - see. I'll put it done to age and maturity for now.
118118 said:
Then re-read your own thread, start from say post#1 then try to assemble it into a narrative leading to you really showing me whose the boss a few post above, then start a-fucking-gain.
And get off the glue, you fucking reek.
118118 said:
Do what you want matey.
Shit thread, shit grounds. And you can't even talk about it properly when asked. Tell me, what is your point - i met a rude anarchist. I'm not suprised if you amble along in real life like this.
Yeah, oddly enough i have. I made it before your 'intervention' - it was about the unversality of rules, but how specific rules aren't univerasal. It was an attempt to comment on how we construct the social beyond the banaility of all anarchists being 'against everything man'. Thanks for you contributions though. Most helpful.
The point is that I keep meeting rude anarchists.
I don't think you've proved my point, not really. But why try and kill this thread with your games?
Sigh. Like I said it wasn't a big deal. I couldn't care less if I don't like anarchists. What does that mean. It means when people ask me "did you meet anyone then". I'll say yeah, i didn't like them.
I don't think you've proved my point, not really. But why try and kill this thread with your games?
Sigh. Like I said it wasn't a big deal. I couldn't care less if I don't like anarchists. What does that mean. It means when people ask me "did you meet anyone then". I'll say yeah, i didn't like them.
118118 said:
Lefort hasn't been a left-communist for 40 years -since he left the group socialisme ou barbarie - he's anormnal post modernist now. I'd be interested in what it was that you read that led to the conclusion that he was a left-communist, or that he was hostile to anarchism. Do you have that line or reference?
118118 said:
Stop being a drunken bum then. Go to a meeting sober. Your mighty ONE meeting is not a good jump off point - statistically.
118118 said:
Pretty effective whe used against someone arguing that because rules are universl specific laws must be universal - i noticed that it was beyond your competence to actualy argue it...
I'm not suprised that you didn't get your mum a card either frankly.
Philosophy of Claude Lefort - Flynn - a phenomneologist - i was reading to help with my philosophy degree
"a society in which all division and conflict would be completely overcome... secretly cherises refernce to One.. and the Same... homogenous time and space... (everything) would express a single way of being... a phantasm of an omnipotence... by the actual exercise of power... The Iceman Cometh...governed by despotic thought... micro bureaucracies" etc
I would suggest you don't buy it as there is little in anarchism in it. In all fairness he has interesting stuff to sayt on liberal democracy.
"a society in which all division and conflict would be completely overcome... secretly cherises refernce to One.. and the Same... homogenous time and space... (everything) would express a single way of being... a phantasm of an omnipotence... by the actual exercise of power... The Iceman Cometh...governed by despotic thought... micro bureaucracies" etc
I would suggest you don't buy it as there is little in anarchism in it. In all fairness he has interesting stuff to sayt on liberal democracy.
Anyone else meet a nasty anarchist? What about a sarcastic socialsit? What about a communist who didn't agree with you? An aggressive tory. Did your walls of self-identitiy come tumbling down aropund you and did you find a sudden urge to whinge about it?
118118 said:
What's this shit?
118118 said:
No i'm not. I don't know you, don't want to know you.
Similar threads
