An example of why Americans likes guns

[alphaDelta]

The geneva convention is for those who singed it.

Assuming you don't actually mean set it on fire, surely even the most cursory Google would reveal that to be you.

 

[pbman]

Wow. You really are quite spectacularly mad.

Its basic common law.

To bad your not famier with it.

 

[pbman]

Assuming you don't actually mean set it on fire, surely even the most cursory Google would reveal that to be you.

REad your own link.

Actually, there is more than one Geneva Convention, but the one referred to in the context of the current US-UK against Iraq is the convention that lays down how prisoners of war (POW) are to be treated by countries that are party to the convention.

Do you need me to expalin that for you more than that?

 

[alphaDelta]

REad your own link.



Do you need me to expalin that for you more than that?

I take it that comprehension is not your forte du jour. Have a look a bit further down.

Collectively, these four conventions are today known simply as the Geneva Conventions. About 150 countries — including the US, the UK and Iraq — are signatories to these conventions.

 

[pbman]

I take it that comprehension is not your forte du jour. Have a look a bit further down.

I assmed you were whinning about gitmo, not iraq.

 

[del]

The geneva convention is for those who singed it.

This may help your confusion as well. I know how hard facts are to come by.

 

[pbman]

This may help your confusion as well. I know how hard facts are to come by.

I'm familer with it, but we don't have any point of contention here in the thread other than a vauge assertation that we are somehow remiss....

In any event we have an entire forum for whinning about the war.

Its that way-------------------->

 

[alphaDelta]

I assmed you were whinning about gitmo, not iraq.

I am. Oddly enough the GC doesn't just apply when you like, much as you would like. If the lot in 'Gitmo' are POWs like you suggest they are, then one would expect the GC to apply.

 

[pbman]

I am. Oddly enough the GC doesn't just apply when you like, much as you would like. If the lot in 'Gitmo' are POWs like you suggest they are, then one would expect the GC to apply.

It would if they signed it.

But they didn't.

Anyways, why does the subject of guns make you so uncomfortable that you try and change topics?

Are you hoplophobic?

 

[alphaDelta]

It would if they signed it.

But they didn't.

Anyways, why does the subject of guns make you so uncomfortable that you try and change topics?

Are you hoplophobic?

You did sign it! It wasn't me that began this detour; it was in part you, and your insistence that denying people their right to defend themselves is the most significant of all cruelties.

 

[pbman]

You did sign it! It wasn't me that began this detour; it was in part you, and your insistence that denying people their right to defend themselves is the most significant of all cruelties.

Well the taliban didn't.

Or al quada........

And denying people the right to defend themselves is a violation of human rights.

This test is for you.

http://www.a-human-right.com/

 

[alphaDelta]

They don't have to sign anything. Have a look for a third time. In fact, just read your own post. You even put it in bold.

Actually, there is more than one Geneva Convention, but the one referred to in the context of the current US-UK against Iraq is the convention that lays down how prisoners of war (POW) are to be treated by countries that are party to the convention

Do you understand what this means now?

 

[nino_savatte]

Hit the road then.

You're a third rate Limbaugh peebs, no question. So, do you think you've changed any minds with your graphs or your arrguments?

 

[pbman]

They don't have to sign anything. Have a look for a third time. In fact, just read your own post. You even put it in bold.Do you understand what this means now?

You have to take the my test before i bother with this crap again.

I've done it before for page after freaking page.

 

[pbman]

You're a third rate Limbaugh peebs, no question. So, do you think you've changed any minds with your graphs or your arrguments?

Of course i have.

I get lots of pm's

 

[alphaDelta]

This test is for you.

http://www.a-human-right.com/

If it weren't such weighted tripe, I might humour you. Sadly, this was always quite unlikely, wasn't it? Of course, having never even seen a real gun in all of my obviously enslaved, unenlightened and frankly miserable existence, I probably wouldn't know how anyway. Yikes a snake!

Idiot.

 

[pbman]

 

[alphaDelta]

Danger, spelling/sobriety/entire argument down the pan? Fear not, we can shoot our way out of this! If only our guns could help us learn...

 

[friedaweed]

POW will be relased when the war is over.

Oh so the wars not over in Afghanistan and Iraq then peebs or are you talking about the fairytale war on terror? If that's the case then there's no hope for them whilst the worlds biggest exporter of terror is still roaming the earth.

 

[nino_savatte]

Of course i have.

I get lots of pm's

Liar.

 

[friedaweed]

The geneva convention is for those who singed it.

The GC is for those countries who find war crimes distasteful. Just like the declaration of human rights, which the US also seems to sidestep like a fine rugby player.

 

[nino_savatte]

Did he say "singed it"?

 

[pbman]

Did he say "singed it"?

Were typing here.

Not talking.

 

[nino_savatte]

Were typing here.

Not talking.

Not that you can do either one well.